California High Court Tells 9th Circuit: Initiative Proponents Have Standing

The California Supreme Court yesterday gave a substantial boost to backers of Proposition 8-- the initiative that amended the state constitution to bar recognition of same-sex marriage.  In a lengthy and unanimous decision in Perry v. Brown, (CA Sup. Ct., Nov. 17, 2911), the state's high court held that:

when the public officials who ordinarily defend a challenged state law or appeal a judgment invalidating the law decline to do so, under article II, section 8 of the California Constitution and the relevant provisions of the Elections Code, the official proponents of a voter-approved initiative measure are authorized to assert the state‘s interest in the initiative‘s validity, enabling the proponents to defend the constitutionality of the initiative and to appeal a judgment invalidating the initiative.

Justice Kennard also filed a concurring opinion.  The court's decision came in response to a question certified to the California Supreme Court by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality under the U.S. Constitution of Proposition 8. The federal district court held that Proposition 8 violated the due process and equal protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution.  State officials refused to defend the constitutionality of Proposition 8 and official proponents of Proposition 8 sought to intervene to defend the measure. (See prior posting). AP reports on yesterday's opinion.

Bishops Launch New Website Opposing Same-Sex Marriage

The U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops has created a new website-- Marriage: Unique for a Reason-- devoted to defending traditional marriage and opposing same-sex marriage.  A welcoming blog post from Bishop Salvatore J. Cordileone, chairman of the bishops' Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage, says in part:

Confusion about marriage's meaning is common today. What is marriage? Why does sexual difference matter for marriage? Do children have a right to a mom and a dad? Is marriage between one man and one woman discriminatory? These and many other questions are being raised with great urgency, and they call out for answers.

The Marriage: Unique for a Reason website is designed as a home of resources on what the Catholic Church teaches about the unique meaning of marriage, and why.

Michigan Anti-Bullying Bill Criticized Over Religious Exemption

Michigan is one of three states without an anti-bullying law. Currently, Matt's Safe School Law, SB 45, is working its way through the state's legislature. ABC News reports that the state Senate passed the bill last Wednesday, but added a controversial exemption that provides the bill "does not prohibit a statement of a sincerely held belief or moral conviction." Columnist Dan Savage strongly criticized the exemption, saying:

It really is a God-hates-fags-special-rights-for-Christians-to-abuse-LBGT-kids-in-the-school law. It's a law that specifically empowers students, teachers, administrators [and] principals to bully LGBT kids if they can point to a moral justification."

Bill sponsor Rick Jones says this language was not intended to allow a child to be confronted or abused, but was merely designed to protect the child who says in class that his religion does not believe in same-sex marriage.  Jones says he is open to the language being changed, so long as students' 1st Amendment rights are protected.


UPDATE: The Michigan House of Representatives on Nov. 10 passed HB 4163, a version of the anti-bullying law that does not contain the language exempting statements motivated by religious or moral beliefs. (Huffington Post.)

Britain To Permit Civil Partnership Ceremonies On Religious Premises

On Wednesday, Britain's Equalities Office published a summary of the responses to its consultation on regulatory changes that would permit same-sex civil partnership ceremonies to take place on the premises of religious institutions in England and Wales. The report includes a draft of The Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011 to implement the changes. (Full text of report.) The report says:

Making this change will allow those religious organisations that wish to do so to host civil partnership registrations on their religious premises. This voluntary provision is a positive step forward for both LGB rights and religious freedom.

The decision by any particular faith group on whether they wish their premises to be designated for civil partnership ceremonies is entirely voluntary.  The proposed regulations will leave it up to local authorities to decide whether they will as well designate clergy who apply to become civil partnership registrars. The draft Regulations will be laid before Parliament so they can come into force by the end of 2011.  The government also promised to publish a consultation document in March 2012 on equal civil marriage. Anglican Journal on Wednesday reported on developments.

Servicemembers Sue To Challenge DOMA and Obtain Equal Spousal Benefits

The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network announced last week that it had filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a number of plaintiffs seeking the same benefits for same-sex spouses of current and former service members as is provided to opposite-sex spouses.  The complaint (full text) in McLaughlin v. United States, (D MA, filed 10/27/2011), asks the court to rule that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional as applied to military spousal benefits, and that the definition of "spouse" in federal statutes relating to military benefits is likewise unconstitutional. The complaint invokes the equal protection clause,the 10th Amendment's  principles of federalism, the fundamental right to marry, and the bill of attainder clause. Thursday's Christian Post reported on the case. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

NY Town Clerk Challenged In Election Over Marriage License Arrangement

AP reported yesterday that in Ledyard, New York, town clerk Rose Marie Belforti is being challenged in November's election by write-in candidate Ed Easter because of the way that Belforti is handling the issuance of marriage licenses.  Belforti decided that her Christian beliefs precluded her from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, so she appointed a deputy clerk to handle marriage licenses for all couples.  Easter says that Belforti is being paid $12,000 per year for her part-time position, and the people should not be asked to pay another person to perform Belforti's duties.  Belforti says it is about accommodating her religious beliefs.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Abhyuday Bhotika, Status and Role of a Karta – A Critical Study, (October 6, 2011).
• Daniel Kroslak, The Cultural Defense in Germany, (October 9, 2011).
• Abdulla Galadari, Inner Meanings of Islamic Finance: Understanding the Theory Behind All Theories, (5th IIUM International Accounting Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 12-13, 2011).
• Anne Twomey, Changing the Rules of Succession to the Throne, (Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/71, Oct 12, 2011).
• Linda Ross Meyer, Book Review: Apology and Sympathy: On the Importance of ‘Training in Moral Discomfort’, (April 9, 2011).
• Christopher C. Lund, The New Victims of the Old Anti-Catholicism, (Connecticut Law Review, 2012).

From SmartCILP:

• Rachel Goldberg and Brian Blancke, God In the Process: Is There a Place for Religion in Conflict Resolution?, [Abstract], 28 Conflict Resolution Quarterly 377-398 (2011).
• Nathan J. McGrath, Reed v. UAW: An Adverse Ruling on Adverse Action, 23 Regent University Law Review 391-402 (2010-2011).
• David Skeel, Making Sense of the New Financial Deal, 5 Liberty University Law Review 181-199 (2011).
• Juan Marco Vaggione, Sexual Rights and religion: Same-sex Marriage and Lawmakers' Catholic Identity in Argentina, [Abstract], 65 University of Miami Law Review 935-954 (2011).
• Rev. Carlton W Veazey and Marjorie Brahms Signer, Religious Perspectives on the Abortion Decision: The Sacredness of Women's Lives, Morality and Values, and Social Justice, 35 N.Y.U. Review of Law and Social Change 281-302 (2011).
• Symposium: Critical Perspectives on the Criminalization of Islamic Philanthropy in the War on Terror. Articles by Jonathan Benthall, Nina J. Crimm, Sally Howell, Erica Caple James, Ramzi Kassem and Khalid Mustafa Medani. 10 UCLA Journal of Islamic & Near Eastern Law 1-137 (2010-2011).

U.S. Bishops Create New Committee On Religious Liberty

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops announced last week that it has formed a new Ad Hoc Committee on Religious Liberty "to address growing concerns over the erosion of freedom of religion in America." USCCB president Archbishop Timothy Dolan also sent a letter to fellow bishops informing them directly of the new Committee, saying:

The Framers of the Constitution themselves understood [religious liberty] ...  to be based on the norms inherent in Natural Law – namely, "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, and that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."  This basic right, in its many and varied applications for Christians and people of faith, is now increasingly and in unprecedented ways under assault in America.

The new committee will be chaired by Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport, Connecticut. Among the pressing issues identified by the bishops are federal policies regarding reproductive health services, administration opposition to the Defense of Marriage Act, the Justice Department's position on the "ministerial exception" doctrine, and the narrow religious exemptions in New York's same-sex marriage law.

Recent Law Review Review Articles

From SSRN:

• Marie Ashe, Privacy and Prurience: An Essay on American Law, Religion, and Women, (American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 51, p. 461, 2011).
• Katherine Spencer, Mahr as Contract: Internal Pluralism and External Perspectives, (Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2011).
• Paul Horwitz, Act III of the Ministerial Exception, (Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Richard W. Painter, The Moral Responsibilities of Investment Bankers, (University of St. Thomas Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2010).
• Samuel T. Grover, Religious Conscience Exemptions to the PPACA Health Insurance Mandate, (American Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2011).
• Leslie C. Griffin, Ordained Discrimination: The Cases Against the Ministerial Exception, (U of Houston Law Center No. 2011-A-9, Sept. 30, 2011).
• Susan E. Hauser, More Than Abstract Justice: The Defense of Marriage Act and the Equal Treatment of Same-Sex Married Couples Under Section 302(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, (American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Forthcoming).
• Anita Bernstein, Toward More Parsimony and Transparency in 'The Essentials of Marriage', (Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 81, 2011).
• Caroline Mala Corbin, The Irony of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC, (Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Forthcoming).

SmartCILP:

• John Garvey, Intellect and Virtue: The Idea of a Catholic University, 60 Catholic University Law Review 563-573 (2011).
• Samuel J. Levine, Second Annual Holocaust Remembrance Lecture at Washington University. Jewish Law From Out of the Depths: Tragic Choices in the Holocaust, 10 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 133-142 (2011).

Military Clears Way For Same-Sex Marriage Ceremonies

In the wake of the final repeal of the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, the Pentagon has issued two memos that clear the way for same-sex marriages to be performed on military bases by military chaplains in states where such marriages are legal.  As reported last week by the Washington Blade, a Sept. 21 memo (full text) from DOD's General Counsel says that: "Determinations regarding the use of DoD real property and facilities for private functions, including religious and other ceremonies, should be made on a sexual-orientation neutral basis, provided such use is not prohibited by applicable state and local laws." It adds that making facilities available does not amount to DoD endorsement of the activities.

A second memo (full text) dated Sept. 30 from Under Secretary of Defense Clifford Stanley says that military chaplains "may participate in or officiate any private ceremony, whether on or off a military installation" so long as it is not prohibited by state or local law. However a chaplain is not required to do so if it "would be in variance with the tenets of his or her religion or personal beliefs."

Release of Tapes of Prop 8 Trial Again On Hold

In the latest skirmish over California's Proposition 8-- the ballot measure that barred same-sex marriage-- a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday issued a stay pending appeal of a district court order that authorized release of digital recordings of the original trial on Prop 8's constitutionality. (See prior posting.) Here full text of the 9th Circuit's order in Perry v. Brown. AP reported on court's action.

Court To Unseal Recording of Proposition 8 Trial

In Perry v. Schwarzenegger, (ND CA, Sept. 19, 2011), a California federal district court judge agreed to unseal the digital recording of last year's non-jury trial last on the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8-- the state constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriage.  Focusing on the importance of transparency of judicial proceedings, the court rejected as unsupported conjecture the argument that release of the recordings would have a chilling effect on expert witnesses' willingness to cooperate in future proceedings.The court, however, stayed the effectiveness of its order until Sept. 30 to give the parties time to file an appeal and seek a further stay. AP reports on the decision.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Nelson Tebbe, Witchcraft and the Constitution, (T.W. Bennett, eds, Traditional African Religions in South African Law p. 156, UTC Press, 2011).
• Mohammad Fadel, A Tragedy of Politics or an Apolitical Tragedy?, (Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 131, No. 1, 2011).
• Kenneth Lasson, Hammerin’ Hank & the Golden Arm: Remembering Baseball’s Jewish Hall of Famers, (Baltimore Jewish Times, April 8, 2011).
• Tokufumi Joshua Noda, The Role of Economics in the Discourse on RLUIPA and Nondiscrimination in Religious Land Use, (Boston College Law Review, Vol.1, 2011).

Engage, Vol 12 No. 2:

• Robert F Wilson and Jana Singer, Same-Sex Marriage and Conscience Exemptions.
• Richard W. Garnett and Kurt T. Lash, The Establishment Clause.
• Gregory S. Baylor and Ronald Chen, Did the Supreme Court Properly Decide Christian Legal Society v. Martinez?
• William L. Saunders, European Court of Human Rights Finds No Right to Abortion Under European Human Rights Convention.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Zachary R. Calo, Islamic Headscarves, Religious Pluralism, and Secular Human Rights, (International Consortium for Law and Religion Studies Conference, Santiago, Chile, September 2011).
• Zachary R. Calo, Human Dignity and Health Law: Personhood in Recent Bioethical Debate, (Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, Forthcoming).
• Robert J. Miller, The International Law of Colonialism: A Comparative Analysis, (August 30, 2011).
• Mark Strasser, Parents, Religious Convictions, and Public School Curricula, (Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, pp. 547-569, 2011).
• Howard Kislowicz, Judging the Rules of Belonging, (U.B.C. Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 2, p. 287, 2011).
• Zachary R. Calo, Catholicism, Liberalism and Human Rights, (Journal of Christian Legal Thought, Forthcoming).
• Lorin C. Geitner, Westboro Baptist and the Limits of Religious Speech, (Orange County Lawyer, Forthcoming).
• Victor M. Muniz-Fraticelli, The Distinctiveness of Religious Liberty, (July 29, 2011).
• Douglas E. Abrams, Reason and Passion: Justice Jackson and the Second Flag Salute Case (Part I), (Precedent, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 22-26, Summer 2011).
• Steve Sanders, The Constitutional Right to (Keep Your) Same-sex Marriage: Why the Due Process Clause Protects Marriages that Cross State Lines, Even if Conflict of Laws Cannot, (August 24, 2011).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• Vol. 26, No.2, Journal of Law and Religion has recently appeared.
• Sept./Oct. 2011 issue of Liberty: A Magazine of Religious Freedom has recently appeared.

Teacher Reinstated After Anti-Gay Marriage Facebook Posting Now Charged With Improper Religious Statements

In Lake County, Florida on Wednesday, school Superintendent Susan Moxley ruled that Mount Dora High School social studies teacher Jerry Buell did not violate the district's code of ethics when he he posted an anti-gay marriage message on his personal Facebook page. The posting said that same-sex unions are a "cesspool" that make him want to throw up. WFTV News reports that the former Teacher of the Year was reinstated when school officials concluded that his posting did not "disrupt the orderly processes of the district." Yesterday, however, the Orlando Sentinel reported that officials have placed a "written directive" in Buell's personnel file because of religious postings on his school webpage and in his class syllabus.  On the webpage, Buell wrote that he tries to "teach and lead my students as if Lake Co. Schools had hired Jesus Christ himself."  On his syllabus, he tells students: "I teach God's truth, I make very few compromises. If you believe you may have a problem with that, get your schedule changed, 'cause I ain't changing!" The webpage has been removed and Buell has been instructed to delete some parts of his syllabus.

Meanwhile, at a rally yesterday, Liberty Counsel featured Buell "along with others who have received similar persecution for their Christian beliefs."

Initiative Proponents Take First Steps Toward Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage In Maine

According to yesterday's Portland Press Herald, proponents of an initiative to legalize same-sex marriage in Maine can now begin gathering signatures on their initiative petitions.  This week, the Secretary of State's office approved the language that would appear on the Novembeer 2012 ballot if at least 57,277 valid signatures are collected:

Do you favor a law allowing marriage licenses for same-sex couples that protects religious freedom by ensuring no religion or clergy be required to perform such a marriage in violation of their religious beliefs?

Proponents have until January to collect the required number of signatures.  If they are successful, the legislature will have an option to enact the legislation. If it does not, then the measure goes on the ballot.

Bachman's Religious Views Traced In New Yorker Article

The New Yorker this week carries a long article on Michelle Bachman titled Leap of Faith-- The Making of a Republican Front-Runner.  The piece, by Ryan Lizza, gives special attention to the content and development of Bachman's religious beliefs.  Lizza writes:

Bachmann belongs to a generation of Christian conservatives whose views have been shaped by institutions, tracts, and leaders not commonly known to secular Americans, or even to most Christians. Her campaign is going to be a conversation about a set of beliefs more extreme than those of any American politician of her stature, including Sarah Palin, to whom she is inevitably compared. Bachmann said in 2004 that being gay is “personal enslavement,” and that, if same-sex marriage were legalized, “little children will be forced to learn that homosexuality is normal and natural and that perhaps they should try it.” Speaking about gay-rights activists, that same year, she said, “It is our children that is the prize for this community.” She believes that evolution is a theory that has “never been proven,” and that intelligent design should be taught in schools.

U.S. House Files Memo In Court Supporting DOMA

As previously reported, after the Obama administration announced that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, the U.S. House of Representatives decided to defend the constitutionality of the statute.  New York Law Journal reports that on Monday, lawyers for the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives filed a memorandum of law (full text) in one of the cases in which the House is defending DOMA.  The case is Windsor v. United States, (SD NY), in which the surviving spouse of a same-sex marriage performed in Canada is seeking to have her marriage recognized for federal estate tax purposes. The memo argues that the court should apply merely rational basis review in assessing the challenge to DOMA, and that the courts should leave any redefinition of marriage to the democratic process. (See prior related posting.) [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

New York Files Amicus Brief Arguing Federal DOMA Is Unconstitutional

New York's Attorney General announced Tuesday that its office has filed an amicus brief (full text) in Windsor v. United States, a case pending in federal district court in New York challenging the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. The case is one in which the surviving spouse of a same-sex couple legally married in Canada is challenging the federal government's refusal to recognize her as a spouse for federal estate tax purposes.  (Background and pleadings in case.) It is also one of the two cases in which the U.S. Department of Justice announced that it would not defend the constitutionality of DOMA. (See prior posting.)  New York's filing of the amicus brief comes only days after same-sex marriages began to be legally performed in the state, though New York had previously recognized the validity of same-sex marriages performed in other states or countries.  Here is an excerpt from the amicus brief:

By refusing to recognize for federal purposes marriages that are valid under state law, DOMA intrudes on matters historically within the control of the States, and undermines and denigrates New York’s law designed to ensure equality of same-sex and different-sex married couples. Thus DOMA threatens basic principles of federalism. Moreover, it classifies and determines access to rights, benefits, and protections based on sexual orientation, and also based on sex.

For each of these reasons, considered separately or together, DOMA should be subjected to heightened scrutiny under the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment, and it cannot withstand such scrutiny.

Yesterday's New York Law Journal has more on the background of the case.

Suit Seeks To Invalidate New York Same-Sex Marriage Law For Procedural Irregularities

Liberty Counsel announced today that it has filed a lawsuit in New York asking a state court to declare the state's Marriage Equality Act void and to declare void any same-sex marriages that have taken place under the Act. (See prior posting.) The complaint (full text) in New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate, (Livingston Co. Sup. Ct., filed 6/25/2011), alleges that there were a number of procedural defects in the passage of the statute. These include violation of the Open Meetings Law, suspension of normal Senate committee hearings and voting procedures, denying lobbyists access to members of the legislature, and pressures on Republican Senators from Wall Street and the governor.