Wiccan service personnel who are buried in national cemeteries will now be able to have a symbol of their faith-- the Pentacle-- placed on their grave markers. A settlement agreement was filed today in a Wisconsin federal district court in a suit filed by the widows of two servicemen last November. (See prior posting.) In the settlement in Circle Sanctuary v. Nicholson, the federal government agrees to add the Pentacle to the list of 38 already approved symbols representing many other religious faiths. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, representing the widows in the lawsuit, says in a release hailing the agreement that the lengthy delay in recognizing the Pentacle seems to have been motivated by bias against Wiccans. The AP reports that the government agreed to settle when it became clear that new rules being drafted by the VA would lead to the Wiccan symbol being favorably considered. Under the settlement, the VA will also pay $225,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs.
UPDATE: Here is a link to the full text of the settlement agreement. The Washington Post on Tuesday quotes AU executive director Barry Lynn as suggesting that the VA's resistance on this issue was due in part to its interpretation of remarks made in 1999 by then-Texas Governor George W Bush critical of Wicca. [Thanks to Melissa Rogers for the leads.]
Showing posts sorted by date for query wiccan wisconsin. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query wiccan wisconsin. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Monday, April 23, 2007
Friday, February 02, 2007
Court Rejects Delay Motion In Wiccan Grave Marker Suit
A federal district court judge in Wisconsin has denied a motion by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to delay the start of a trial in a lawsuit seeking a decision on adding the Wiccan pentacle to the list of permissible symbols on veterans' memorial markers in national cemeteries. The Associated Press reported yesterday that in a one-line order, the court rejected a motion by the VA in Circle Sanctuary v. Nicholson to delay the trial while it finalizes a new rule on gravestone markers. The suit alleges that the VA has already delayed ruling on the matter for over nine years. (See prior posting.) Trial is now set to begin on the matter on June 29.
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Two Suits Are Filed Seeking VA Approval Of Wiccan Grave Markers
Following on a suit filed by the ACLU in September, yesterday Americans United for Separation of Church and State announced that it has filed two lawsuits seeking U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA) approval of the Pentacle as a permissible symbol on memorial markers of Wiccan veterans buried in national cemeteries. The VA has approved symbols of 38 other faiths, but has delayed for years a ruling on requests by families of Wiccan veterans.
In Circle Sanctuary v. Nicholson, (full text of complaint) two widows, along with two Wiccan organizations, are asking a Wisconsin federal district court to rule that the VA is violating the First and Fifth Amendments, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Administrative Procedure Act by refusing to issue any decision on the Pentacle applications and by discriminatorily maintaining a list of government approved religions. The same parties also filed suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (full text of complaint) challenging the constitutionality of the VA's Emblems of Beliefs Rule that limits the religious emblems that can be placed on grave markers in veterans' cemeteries. The complaint charges that the rule violates the Establishment, Free Exercise, Free Speech and Due Process Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. The Associated Press yesterday reported on the cases.
In Circle Sanctuary v. Nicholson, (full text of complaint) two widows, along with two Wiccan organizations, are asking a Wisconsin federal district court to rule that the VA is violating the First and Fifth Amendments, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Administrative Procedure Act by refusing to issue any decision on the Pentacle applications and by discriminatorily maintaining a list of government approved religions. The same parties also filed suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (full text of complaint) challenging the constitutionality of the VA's Emblems of Beliefs Rule that limits the religious emblems that can be placed on grave markers in veterans' cemeteries. The complaint charges that the rule violates the Establishment, Free Exercise, Free Speech and Due Process Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. The Associated Press yesterday reported on the cases.
Sunday, November 12, 2006
This Week's Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Derby v. Worsham, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81216 (ED MO, Nov. 6, 2006), a Missouri federal district court permitted a Wiccan prisoner to proceed with his claim that his free exercise rights were infringed when prison officials confiscated black candles and other ritual items, saying they were used in "darker worship styles".
In Modena v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81205 (D MN, Nov. 3, 2006), a Minnesota federal district court rejected a prisoner's claim that federal law requiring the collection of a DNA sample from federal prisoners violates his right to the free exercise of religion.
In Fayson v. Earle, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81567 (D DE, Nov. 7, 2006), a Delaware federal district court permitted a Muslim prisoner to proceed with her claim under the First Amendment and RLUIPA that she had been denied a Halal diet. However it granted summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff's free exercise, equal protection and RLUIPA claims that Muslims were denied adequate access to religious services and instruction.
In Miniero v. Craven, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82315 (D ID, Nov. 9, 2006), a prisoner claimed that he was unlawfully required him to complete a religious-oriented rehabilitation program in order to be considered for parole. An Idaho federal district court denied the prisoner's request for a temporary restraining order, finding that plaintiff has now been offered the opportunity to participate in an alternative non-religious program.
In Borzych v. Frank, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82289 (WD WI, Nov. 9, 2006), a prisoner who followed Odinism challenged the denial of his right to keep his Thor's Hammer emblem which he wore around his neck for spiritual protection. Prison authorities had banned the emblem because of its association with disruptive groups. A Wisconsin federal district court permitted plaintiff to proceed with his free exercise, RLUIPA and establishment clause claims challenging the prison's policy. It dismissed a number of other constitutional claims asserted by plaintiff.
In Modena v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81205 (D MN, Nov. 3, 2006), a Minnesota federal district court rejected a prisoner's claim that federal law requiring the collection of a DNA sample from federal prisoners violates his right to the free exercise of religion.
In Fayson v. Earle, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81567 (D DE, Nov. 7, 2006), a Delaware federal district court permitted a Muslim prisoner to proceed with her claim under the First Amendment and RLUIPA that she had been denied a Halal diet. However it granted summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff's free exercise, equal protection and RLUIPA claims that Muslims were denied adequate access to religious services and instruction.
In Miniero v. Craven, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82315 (D ID, Nov. 9, 2006), a prisoner claimed that he was unlawfully required him to complete a religious-oriented rehabilitation program in order to be considered for parole. An Idaho federal district court denied the prisoner's request for a temporary restraining order, finding that plaintiff has now been offered the opportunity to participate in an alternative non-religious program.
In Borzych v. Frank, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82289 (WD WI, Nov. 9, 2006), a prisoner who followed Odinism challenged the denial of his right to keep his Thor's Hammer emblem which he wore around his neck for spiritual protection. Prison authorities had banned the emblem because of its association with disruptive groups. A Wisconsin federal district court permitted plaintiff to proceed with his free exercise, RLUIPA and establishment clause claims challenging the prison's policy. It dismissed a number of other constitutional claims asserted by plaintiff.
Sunday, September 10, 2006
This Week's Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Gillard v. Kuykendall, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62291 (WD AR, Aug. 30, 2006), an Arkansas federal district judge accepted the recommendation of a magistrate judge and refused to dismiss a prisoner's claim that his free exercise rights were violated when he was required to mop and clean his cell every day, including his Sabbath day.
In Mark v. Gustafson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62376 (WD WI, Aug. 30, 2006), a Wisconsin federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Wiccan prisoner whose "magic seals" were removed from his prison cell walls and door by prison officials.
In Shaka Zulu Acoolia v. Angelone, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62574 (WD VA, Sept. 1, 2006), a Virginia federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Rastafarian prisoner who was refused a strict vegan diet and instead served the prison's vegetarian Alternative Entree Menu that includes eggs, milk and sweets.
In Jackson v. Department of Correction, 2006 Mass. Super. LEXIS 389 (Middlesex County, Aug. 25, 2006) a Massachusetts Superior Court judge found that the state's Department of Corrections violated RLUIPA by failing to provide an Imam to perform jum'ah services at MCI-Shirley every Friday, and by having female correctional officers in non-emergency situations pat-frisk male Muslim inmates (including touching of the inmate's genital or anal areas). These practices were also found to violate a Massachusetts statute that requires equal treatment of prisoners who are not being disciplined. (See prior related posting.)
In Kaufman v. McCaughtry, (7th Cir., Sept. 7, 2006), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's holding that prison officials who denied atheists the right to form a study grope were entitled to qualified immunity because prior precedents were not clear on whether atheism was to be treated as a religion.
In Mark v. Gustafson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62376 (WD WI, Aug. 30, 2006), a Wisconsin federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Wiccan prisoner whose "magic seals" were removed from his prison cell walls and door by prison officials.
In Shaka Zulu Acoolia v. Angelone, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62574 (WD VA, Sept. 1, 2006), a Virginia federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Rastafarian prisoner who was refused a strict vegan diet and instead served the prison's vegetarian Alternative Entree Menu that includes eggs, milk and sweets.
In Jackson v. Department of Correction, 2006 Mass. Super. LEXIS 389 (Middlesex County, Aug. 25, 2006) a Massachusetts Superior Court judge found that the state's Department of Corrections violated RLUIPA by failing to provide an Imam to perform jum'ah services at MCI-Shirley every Friday, and by having female correctional officers in non-emergency situations pat-frisk male Muslim inmates (including touching of the inmate's genital or anal areas). These practices were also found to violate a Massachusetts statute that requires equal treatment of prisoners who are not being disciplined. (See prior related posting.)
In Kaufman v. McCaughtry, (7th Cir., Sept. 7, 2006), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's holding that prison officials who denied atheists the right to form a study grope were entitled to qualified immunity because prior precedents were not clear on whether atheism was to be treated as a religion.
Monday, April 17, 2006
More Prisoner Free Exercise Claims Decided
In Howard v. Wilson, (5th Cir. April 11, 2006), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Mississippi federal district court's dismissal of a prisoner's free exercise challenge to the refusal of state prison officials to recognize the prisoner's adoption of a Muslim name. The appeal was dismissed as frivolous.
In Mark v. Off, (WD Wis., March 31, 2006), a Wisconsin federal district court rejected a former state prison inmate's free exercise claims brought under the First Amendment and RLUIPA. Mark Off variously claimed he was a Wiccan, a pagan, and a ritual magician. He brought suit challenging prison officials' removal of his "magic seals" from his cell walls and door.
In Keesh v. Smith, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18834 (ND NY, March 2, 2006), a New York federal district court refused to issue a preliminary injunction to require New York correctional authorities to accommodate two prisoners' requests to practice the religion of "Tulukeesh". One of the prisoners identifies himself as the "Savior and Teacher" of Tulukeesh and says its tenets and practices are set out in the book "Holy Blackness," which he authored.
In Andreola v. Wisconsin, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19123 (ED Wis., April 4, 2006), a lawsuit that has already been up to the 7th Circuit once, a Wisconsin federal district judge issued orders clarifying the remaining issues in a prisoner's lawsuit seeking greater accommodation of his request for kosher food than Wisconsin authorities are willing to grant. The court rejected plaintiff's claim under the First Amendment, but found that a claim under the higher standard of RLUIPA remains.
In Mark v. Off, (WD Wis., March 31, 2006), a Wisconsin federal district court rejected a former state prison inmate's free exercise claims brought under the First Amendment and RLUIPA. Mark Off variously claimed he was a Wiccan, a pagan, and a ritual magician. He brought suit challenging prison officials' removal of his "magic seals" from his cell walls and door.
In Keesh v. Smith, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18834 (ND NY, March 2, 2006), a New York federal district court refused to issue a preliminary injunction to require New York correctional authorities to accommodate two prisoners' requests to practice the religion of "Tulukeesh". One of the prisoners identifies himself as the "Savior and Teacher" of Tulukeesh and says its tenets and practices are set out in the book "Holy Blackness," which he authored.
In Andreola v. Wisconsin, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19123 (ED Wis., April 4, 2006), a lawsuit that has already been up to the 7th Circuit once, a Wisconsin federal district judge issued orders clarifying the remaining issues in a prisoner's lawsuit seeking greater accommodation of his request for kosher food than Wisconsin authorities are willing to grant. The court rejected plaintiff's claim under the First Amendment, but found that a claim under the higher standard of RLUIPA remains.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)