Florida Episcopal Diocese Prevails Against Breakaway Church

In Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Florida, Inc. v. Lebhar, (FL 4th Cir., April 27, 2007), a Florida state circuit court upheld the claim of the Episcopal Diocese of Florida to the Jacksonville property on which the break away Church of the Redeemer is located. The court held that in an hierarchical church, a civil court is required to respect the determination by the Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese that the defendants-- the Rector, Wardens and Vestry of the church-- had abandoned the Episcopal Church when they announced that the Church would affiliate with the Anglican Church of Uganda. Yesterday's Episcopal News Service reported on the decision. The court, however, refused to grant summary judgment on the Diocese's request for attorneys' fees, deciding that questions of fact remained to be determined. The court said that this aspect of the case poses the interesting question of whether awarding attorneys' fees in a dispute within an hierarchical church would impermissibly entangle the court in the internal decisions of the church.

Baltimore May Require Religious Accommodation By Condo Boards

Last month, Baltimore City Council member Rochelle "Rikki" Spector proposed legislation to prohibit rules in multifamily dwellings that "deny reasonable accommodation" to practice one's religion. Today's Baltimore Sun reports that in one Baltimore condominium, residents are battling over whether the building will accommodate Orthodox Jews by having a "Sabbath elevator". In February, the condo board voted 5-3 to strike from the contract to renovate the building's two elevators a clause that would have programmed one of them to stop automatically on every floor on Saturdays. Orthodox Jews are able to use elevators that are pre-programmed in this way on their Sabbath without violating Jewish religious law. Spector's bill had used Sabbath elevators as a specific example of accommodation, but after meeting with the Strathmore Tower condominium board, she said she would remove the example from the proposed law. Another condominium in Baltimore has struggled over whether to permit Orthodox Jews to use a security door on Saturdays to shorten their walk to synagogue. In the 2005, the Imperial Condominium board voted for security reasons to deny access to the security door, changing a 20 foot walk into one of several blocks.

ACLU Says Government Funded Abstinence Program Is Religiously Based

The ACLU has charged in a letter to the Secretary of Health and Human Services last week that federal grants for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs are being used unconstitutionally to fund the Stop and Think program in Oregon, South Dakota and Wyoming. The ACLU charges that contracts entered by federally funded social service agencies require that Stop and Think presenters be Christians, suggesting that religion is an essential part of the Stop and Think program. (ACLU Press Release). The Oregon ACLU has written the Oregon Department of Human Services which acts as a conduit for some of the federal funds involved, also asking it to investigate. A posting on Saturday on Talk To Action has a longer discussion of the issue. Stop and Think's website makes no mention of religion in discussing its program. [Thanks to Blog From the Capital for the lead.]

NYC Resolution Would Mark 350th Anniversary of Flushing Remonstrance

Historians say that the first formal exercise of religious freedom in the American colonies was the Flushing Remonstrance of December 27, 1657. Its 31 signers demanded that then-Governor of New Amsterdam, Peter Stuyvesant, allow the free exercise of religion and protested his ban on practicing any religion other than that of Dutch Reform Church-- particularly his prohibition on receiving Quakers. Four of the signers of the Remonstrance were arrested. New York plans to commemorate the 350th anniversary of the document in December in a ceremony that includes descendants of the original signers. According to the Gotham Gazette, New York City Council member Helen Sears this week proposed Resolution 825 to formally commemorate the signing of the document.

Mexico City Archbishop Sued Over Opposition To Abortion Law

Today's California Catholic Daily says that in Mexico, the Social-Democrat Alternative Party has filed a lawsuit against Cardinal Norberto Rivera, Archbishop of Mexico City. It alleges that he violated prohibitions on political activity by clergy through his outspoken opposition to the recent legislation in Mexico City legalizing abortion. (See prior posting.) The suit claims that the Cardinal violated Article 130 of the Mexican Constitution which provides: "Ministers may not associate among themselves for political ends, or preach in favor of or against any political candidate, party, or association. Neither may they oppose the laws of the country or its institutions ... in public meetings, acts of the sect, or religious literature."

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:
Richard W. Garnett, Church, State, and the Practice of Love, (Villanova Law Review, Vol. 52, p. 281).

The Winter 2007 issue of the Journal of Church and State (Vol. 49, No. 1) has recently been published.

Scott C. Idleman, Religion and Government-- An Ongoing Experiment, Marquette Lawyer, Spring/Summer 2007, pg. 12.

From SmartCILP:
Nusrat Choudhury, From the Stasi Commission to the European Court of Human Rights: L'affaire du Foulard and the Challenge of Protecting the Rights of Muslim Girls, 16 Columbia Journal of Gender & Law 199-396 (2007).

Bruce J. Dierenfield, The Most Hated Woman in America: Madalyn Murray and the Crusade Against School Prayer, 32 Journal of Supreme Court History 62-84 (2007).

Kenneth L. Marcus, The Most Important Right We Think We Have But Don't: Freedom From Religious Discrimination in Education, 7 Nevada Law Journal 171-181 (2006).

Prakash Shah, Thinking Beyond Religion: Legal Pluralism in Britain's South Asian Diaspora, 8 Australian Journal of Asian Law 237-260 (2006).

Israel's AG Moves To Revoke Contested Appointments of Religious Court Judges

As previously reported, in March a petition was filed with Israel's High Court of Justice challenging the appointment of 15 judges-- mostly ultra-Orthodox-- to the country's rabbinic courts. While the petition focused primarily on technical issues, the true dispute is over whether judges will reflect a spectrum of views on Jewish law. According to yesterday's Haaretz, as the date for responding to the petitions in the High Court approaches, Attorney General Menachem Mazuz has directed Justice Minister Daniel Friedman to cancel the appointments. Apparently the Justice Ministry will tell the High Court that the procedural issues raised in the petitions can be dealt with, but that this might take longer than merely reopening discussions by the Rabbinic Judges Appointments Committee. Today's Jerusalem Post reports that the legal issue presented is the fact that certificates granting 14 of the 15 elected rabbis the right to serve as religious court judges had expired before the election took place. They need to be renewed every two years, and now have been, so that a new election could take place quickly.

Rabbinic Court judges are supposed to be experts in religious law, but also have "a general or legal education" and "knowledge of languages." Also preference is to be given to candidates "who are involved in Israeli society and who have served in the army or been involved in public affairs." The modern Orthodox rabbis' group, Tzohar, is concerned that these criteria are being ignored.

Suit On Church Rental of State Building Space Settled

The Alliance Defense Fund has announced that last Thursday it voluntarily dismissed a suit it had filed against New York state officials challenging a policy that prevented the renting of a conference room in a Watertown, NY state office building to the Relevant Church for Easter services. (See prior postings, 1, 2.) State officials have now adopted a policy that permits renting space in the Dulles State Office Building for religious activities or services on the same terms as it is rented to private groups for other educational, cultural and civic activities. The dismissal in Relevant Church v. Egan was "without prejudice" so that the suit can be re-filed if officials do not carry out the new policy.

Britain's Lord Chancellor Says Veil Can Be Banned By Schools

Britain's Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, yesterday in a speech to a convention of head teachers said that the Muslim full-face niqab, as well as the full-length jilbab gown, can be banned from British classrooms. Today's London Daily Express reports on Falconer's confirmation that school uniform policies can ban students from wearing these items. Pointing to a decision last year by the British House of Lords, he said that "common sense and human rights are entirely in line with each other".

Recent and Upcoming Books on Law and Religion

Philip Jenkins, God's Continent: Christianity, Islam, and Europe's Religious Crisis, (Oxford Univ. Press, May 2007).

Malcolm B. Yarnell III, First Freedom: The Baptist Perspective on Religious Liberty, (B&H Publishing, May 2007) (Press release).

Bruce J. Dierenfield, The Battle Over School Prayer: How Engel v. Vitale Changed America, (Univ. Press of Kansas, April 2007).

Stephen Mansfield, Ten Tortured Words: How the Founding Fathers Tried to Protect Religion in America . . . and What's Happened Since, (Thomas Nelson, June 2007).

Matthew Chapman, 40 Days and 40 Nights: Darwin, Intelligent Design, God, OxyContin, and Other Oddities on Trial in Pennsylvania, (HarperCollins, April 2007).

NC Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge To Use of Church Funds

In Harris v. Matthews, (NC Sup. Ct., May 4, 2007), the North Carolina Supreme Court dismissed on First Amendment grounds a claim by a faction of the church that its pastor and certain church officials breached their fiduciary duties by improperly using church funds. The majority held:

Determining whether actions, including expenditures, by a church's pastor, secretary, and chairman of the Board of Trustees were proper requires an examination of the church's view of the role of the pastor, staff, and church leaders, their authority and compensation, and church management. Because a church's religious doctrine and practice affect its understanding of each of these concepts, seeking a court's review of the matters presented here is no different than asking a court to determine whether a particular church's grounds for membership are spiritually or doctrinally correct or whether a church's charitable pursuits accord with the congregation's beliefs. None of these issues can be addressed using neutral principles of law.

Justice Brady wrote a concurring opinion, taking a restrictive view of the reach of the Establishment Clause. He wrote:

The "wall of separation" metaphor should only be used, if at all, in cases such as the one sub judice. In other words, the gate to the "wall of separation" only swings one way, locking the government out of ecclesiastical matters.

Justices Hudson and Timmons-Goodson dissented arguing that it was improper to grant an interlocutory appeal in the case and that the case merely presents a property dispute that can be resolved by civil courts using neutral principles of law.

Turkey's Gul Pulls Out of Race As Country Debates Secularist Tradition

In Turkey this morning, Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul withdrew his candidacy for the presidency as Parliament once again failed to muster the quorum necessary to proceed with a vote. Members of Parliament from Turkey's secularist party again boycotted the session. (AP). These developments occurred as tens of thousands of Turks demonstrated in Manisa in support of Turkey's secularist tradition and against the perceived increase of Islamic influence that would follow from Gul's election. (New York Times.) Gul's AK Party has Islamic roots, but claims that it is modern and has moved beyond its Islamic roots. (CNN).

Meanwhile this morning two papers in Britain have interesting analyses of the tensions in Turkey. The Guardian says:

The conflict has been as much about political power and class as it has been about Islam. The simple version paints out inconvenient facts: Erdogan's avowed support for secularism, an AKP whose leadership rejects the label of Islamist, and a programme dedicated to gaining EU membership and attracting foreign investment.

But underpinning this confrontation is something more mundane. It is the fear of the wealthy, highly educated and westernised elite that has traditionally run Turkey - and who are secular - of being pushed aside by a newly-powerful group made up of the urban poor and the lower-middle classes, a group that is conservative and religiously observant.

Today's London Times reports that the complex dispute has become symbolized by controversy over whether Turkish women should wear the the Islamic headscarf. Gul's wife does.

Impacting all of this is a vote in Parliament last Thursday giving initial support to an AKP proposal for direct popular election of the President, instead of the President being elected by Parliament. (Sunday's Zaman). (See prior related posting.)

UPDATE: Monday's Turkish Daily News also has an analysis of the situation, saying that it is more a political battle than a religious one. And a Newsweek columnist reports on his interview with Abdullah Gul who denies that the AKP has an Islamist agenda.

California County Wants To Issue Permits For Religious Use of Roadkill

California's Calaveras County Fish and Game Commission has formally requested the state Department of Fish and Game for permission to issue permits to practitioners of Native American religions so they can salvage dead birds and animals for religious purposes. Today's Stockton (CA) Record says that the issue was raised when former prison chaplain, Fred Velasquez, was cited by a game warden for picking up a dead red-tail hawk near a California highway. Velasquez uses bones and feathers from dead animals to make the regalia used in ceremonies of the Roundhouse tradition.

Author Says LDS Church Historically Suports Church-State Separation

Yesterday's Salt Lake Tribune carries an article by author Gary Bergera chronicling a long history of formal pronouncements of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in support of separation of church and state. This article comes as the media focus more and more on the views of Mitt Romney, the Mormon former governor of Massachusetts who is seeking the Republican nomination for the Presidency in 2008. Yesterday Romney gave the commencement address Regent University, founded by televangelist Pat Robertson. He did not discuss his religious beliefs in his address. (Washington Post).

Court Official Says Bailiff Wrong In Asking Witness To Remove Kippah

A Jackson County, Illinois court bailiff acted inappropriately last month when he asked Benjamin Sloan, an Orthodox Jew, appearing as a witness in a civil case, to remove his kippah (skullcap) in the courtroom. That is the conclusion of the court's Director of Operations Linda Austin, who said: "Any individuals with religious garb, be it a Muslim scarf or a skullcap, should never be asked to remove them before entering the courthouse or a courtroom." The Southern today reports that Sloan, saying he is only a little miffed, attributed the incident to cultural insensitivity on the part of courthouse security officers.

Azeri Journalists Sentenced to Prison For Exciting Religious Hostility

The Associated Press and Radio Free Europe report that a district court in Baku, Azerbaijan on Friday sentenced two journalists from the newspaper Senet to 3 and 4 years in prison respectively for publishing an article criticizing Islam and the Prophet Muhammad. Reporter Rafiq Tagi and his editor, reported variously to be either Samir Huseinov or Samir Sadagatoglu, were convicted on charges of exciting religious hostility in violation of Article 283.1 of Azerbaijan's Criminal Code. The article, published last November, said Islam had suffocated people, made them less free and hindered humanity's development. (See prior related posting.)

Yemini Official Threatens To Replace Mosque Leaders Who Push Extremism

Saturday's Yemen Observer reports that at a meeting at the Ministry of Endowments late last week, the new Yemeni Minister of Endowment and Guidance, Hamoud al-Hetar, announced that he would replace any mosque leaders who adopt extremism and fanaticism in sermons and lectures. He emphasized the importance of a culture of tolerance and co-existence. The pronouncement grows in part out of the unrest in Sa'ada province where al-Houthi rebels are demanding the replacement of Salafi and Wahabi mosque leaders.

Is National Day of Prayer Underinclusive?

Is the National Day of Prayer (see prior posting) underinclusive? Has it taken on Judeo-Christian focus that should be expanded to include other faiths as well? Yesterday's Daily Pilot carries comments from seven members of the clergy discussing the issue.

Texas House Approves Adding "Under God" To State Pledge

On Friday, the Texas House of Representatives passed HB 1034, adding "under God" to the pledge of allegiance to the state flag. The final vote was 141- 0 with one person not voting. Since 2003, state law has required public school students to recite the U.S. and Texas pledge, and observe a moment of silence, every school day. (Houston Chronicle). According to the San Antonio Express-News, a small group of Democrats in the House lost in an attempt to also add the words “liberty and justice” to the pledge. If the Senate also passes this bill, the state pledge will read: "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God and indivisible." (See prior related posting.)

Discrimination Found In School's Differential Holiday Leave

In Troy v. City of Lynn School District, 2007 Mass. Comm. Discrim. LEXIS 19 (MCAD, April 18, 2007), the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination held that the Lynn school system’s collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with the school administrator’s union discriminated against a Catholic employee. The CBA provided that in addition to general school holidays for Christmas and Good Friday, paid leave was granted to Jewish employees for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur; and to Orthodox employees for Orthodox Good Friday. Administrator Paul Troy, a devout Roman Catholic, was refused his request to have Holy Thursday and Ascension Thursday off as paid holidays. The Commission held that the school had put forward no legitimate non-discriminatory reason for treating members of different religious faiths differently. The Commission ordered the school to end discrimination based on religious affiliation and to pay $4857 in damages to Troy. [Thanks to Eugene Volokh via Religionlaw listserv for the lead.]