Parliament Expands Churches In Which Anglican Couples May Be Married

In Britain, Parliament enacts changes to rules governing the Church of England, once they have been approved by the General Synod of the Church of England. (Fact Sheet on Church of England Measures). Yesterday's Christian Post reports that Parliament's new Church of England Marriage Measure 2008 has just gone into effect. The new law makes it easier for couples to be married in the Church of England by expanding the parish churches they can choose. They no longer need to currently live or attend church in the parish in which they wish to have their marriage ceremony. Now it is also enough that they previously lived or attended church there, that the bride or groom was baptised or confirmed in the parish, their parents lived or attended church there, or their parents or grandparents were married there.

Suit Challenges College's Rules On Access For Speakers

The Alliance Defense Fund this week reported on a lawsuit it has filed challenging speech restrictions at a California community college. In Dozier v. Members of the Board of Governors, Yuba College District, (ED CA filed 9,29/2008), (full text of complaint), a college student challenged campus rules and permit requirements that limited his ability to preach and hand out gospel tracts in outdoor areas of the campus. (ADF press release.)

Justice Department Sues DC Transit Authority For Religious Discrimination

Washington Business Journal reported yesterday that the Department of Justice has filed a Title VII religious discrimination lawsuit against Washington DC's Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Suing on behalf of Gloria Jones, a member of the Apostolic Pentecostal faith, the complaint alleges that WMATA violated its obligation to accommodate religious beliefs when it refused to hire Jones because her religious views require her to wear long skirts. This is inconsistent with WAMTA's uniform requirements that call for drivers to wear pants. According to the Justice Department's release on the case, the complaint "seeks an order requiring WMATA to reasonably accommodate and provide equal employment opportunities for persons whose religious practices require an accommodation to the uniform policy..., monetary damages and other relief...."

Episcopal Church Settles With 2 Break-Away Virginia Congregations

The Episcopal Church and the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia have settled with two of eleven break-away congregations that they sued after the congregations joined the more conservative the Convocation of Anglicans in North America. Yesterday's Anglican Journal reports that the settlement is with Potomac Falls Church in Potomac Falls, and Christ the Redeemer Church in Chantilly, neither of which held real property. The two congregations will make a payment of an undisclosed amount and will be released from future liability arising from the lawsuit. The other nine congregations, which are attempting to keep their church buildings and other property after the break off, remain in extended litigation. (See prior related posting.)

Sarkozy Defends Ban On Sikh Turbans At Summit With India's Prime Minister

Tuesday's issue of New Europe reports that French President Nicolas Sarkozy was placed in an awkward position at the press conference concluding the European Union/India Summit in Marseille. Standing next to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a Sikh who was wearing a light blue turban, Sarkozy was asked by a reporter about a French law that prohibits Sikh civil servants from wearing turbans at work, and Sikh public school students from wearing them in school. An irritated Sarkozy replied: "Sir, we respect Sikhs. We respect their customs, their traditions. They are most welcome to France. But sir, we have rules, rules concerning the neutrality of civil servants, rules concerning secularism, and these rules don't apply only to Sikhs, they apply to Muslims or others. They apply to all on the territory of the French Republic." (See prior related posting.)

Israeli Religious Papers Have Issues on Covering Likely New Prime Minister

The New York Daily News reported last week on an unusual issue of press coverage created by Israel’s Haredi (ultra orthodox Jewish) newspapers. The newspapers never publish photos of women, citing concerns relating to religious modesty. The rule will continue to be applied to Tzipi Livni who has been chosen to become the country’s new prime minister, if she can put a coalition together. Haredi papers blur the faces of women when they are in photos used for other purposes. In addition, the Haredi papers will not use the first name, "Tzipi", that Livni uses. It is short for "Tziporah". Haredi will not address a woman by her first name, especially if it is a nickname. So these papers will refer to the potential Prime Minister as "Mrs. T. Livni" or just "Mrs. Livni." [Thanks to Religion and State in Israel for the lead.]

Follow-Up On ADF's Pulpit Freedom Sunday

Alliance Defense Fund has published the names of 33 churches and their pastors who participated in Pulpit Freedom Sunday last weekend. The ADF press release said "Pastors participating in Pulpit Freedom Sunday preached from their pulpits Sept. 28 about the moral qualifications of candidates seeking political office. The pastors exercised their First Amendment right to preach on the subject, despite federal tax regulations that prohibit intervening or participating in a political campaign." (See prior related posting.) On Monday Americans United asked the Internal Revenue Service to investigate six of the churches. (Press release).

Rosh Hashanah Begins Tonight; Bush Sends Greetings; Financial Bailout Vote Impacted

President Bush today issued a message (full text) sending "best wishes for a meaningful Rosh Hashanah" to people of the Jewish faith in the U.S. and around the world. The holiday begins at sundown this evening. He described the holiday as "an opportunity to celebrate the history of the Jewish people and the values that bind us all together."

Meanwhile, the U.S. Senate was scheduled to adjourn beginning at sundown Monday in honor of Rosh Hashanah. That however creates problems with obtaining approval of critical financial bailout legislation that was drafted over the weekend. Politco reported yesterday that Sen. Judd Gregg, who led negotiations on the bill for the Senate Republicans, pleaded for Senators to bring the bill to a vote today because of the need for swift action. CQ Politics today reports that it is likely that a cloture vote on the bill will be set for Wednesday in the Senate. Reform Jews generally celebrate Rosh Hashanah for one day, while Orthodox and Conservative Jews celebrate it for two days. The financial bailout vote schedule could pose a moral dilemma for some of the 13 Jewish members of the Senate who would need to decide whether to attend the Wednesday Senate session on a holiday during which observant Jews generally abstain from work and travel.

Virginia Buddhists File RLUIPA Suit Over Zoning Denial

Last month, the Virginia Beach (VA) city council refused to renew a temporary use permit that would have allowed the Buddhist Education Center of America Inc. to continue to hold Sunday services in a monk's home. The Virginian Pilot reports that last Thursday, Buddhist monks and their followers filed a lawsuit in federal court alleging that the permit denial violates RLUIPA and their First Amendment free exercise rights. (See prior related posting.)

Spa Owner Says 1st Amendment Protects "Laying On of Hands"

In July, a civil jury in Tuscon, Arizona found against John LaVoie in a civil forfeiture proceeding charging him with prostitution related offenses. Today's Arizona Star reports that LaVoie, who operates the Angel's Heaven Relaxation Spa, says he is pastor of the Church of Liberty. He is objecting to the proposed order that he forfeit nearly $2 million in assets, asserting a free exercise defense. He argues that Spa employees were merely comforting the afflicted through the religious act of "laying on of hands." Meanwhile it turns out that in February 2006, while LaVoie was being investigated, Pima County, using its random selection procedure to invite ministers to deliver an invocation at the Board of Supervisors meeting, heard an invocation from LaVoie.

British Muslim Driver Sues Over Handling Alcohol

Today's London Daily Express reports on a suit filed in an industrial tribunal in the British city of Birmingham by a Muslim fork lift truck driver. Mohammed Ahmed brought suit against the Tesco supermarkets after it turned out that his job required him to handle alcohol-- an action that violates his religious beliefs. Ahmed says that after he filed a grievance, he was harassed. Tesco's lawyer says that Ahmed was advised at the outset about the duties required by the job.

New Articles of Interest This Week Abound

From SSRN (U.S. law):

• Lloyd H. Mayer, The Pulpit, Politics, RFRA, and Institutional Free Exercise, (Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 08-30, Sept. 2008).
• Ira C. Lupu & Robert W. Tuttle, Courts, Clergy, and Congregations: Disputes between Religious Institutions and Their Leaders, (Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2009).
• Lynn S. Branham, 'The Devil is in the Details': A Continued Dissection of the Constitutionality of Faith-Based Prison Units, (U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-35 (Sept. 2008).
• Aaron K. Block, When Money Is Tight, Is Strict Scrutiny Loose?: Cost Sensitivity as a Compelling Governmental Interest Under the Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, (September, 23 2008).
• Scott C. Idleman, Private Conscience, Public Duties: The Unavoidable Conflicts Facing a Catholic Justice, (University of St. Thomas Law Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 312-324, 2007).
• Martha M. Ertman, 'They Ain't Whites; They're Mormons': An Illustrated History of Polygamy as Race Treason, (U. of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-37, September 2008).
• Ira C. Lupu & Robert W. Tuttle, Constitutional Change and Responsibilities of Governance Pertaining to the Faith-Based and Community Initiative, in Research on Innovations in Effective Compassion (HHS, June 2008).

From SSRN (non-US law):

• Kathryn Chan, Taxing Charities/Imposer Les Organismes DeBienfaisance: Harmonization and Dissonance in Canadian Charity Law, (Canadian Tax Journal/ Reue Fiscale Canadienne, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2007).
• Marc Hertogh, What's in a Handshake? Legal Equality and Legal Consciousness in the Netherlands, (Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2009).
• Smita Narula, Equal by Law, Unequal by Caste: The 'Untouchable' Condition in Critical Race Perspective, (Wisconsin International Law Journal, Vol. 26, p. 255, 2008).

From SmartCILP:

• Symposium, The Constitutionality of Faith-Based Prison Units [full text of all articles], 6 Ave Maria Law Review 341-511 (2008).
• David C. Flatto, The King and I: The Separation of Powers in Early Hebraic Political Theory, 20 Yale Journal of Law & Humanities 61-110 (2008).

Four Texas School Board Members Urge Controversial Bible Curriculum

Last summer, the Texas State Board of Education approved only general guidelines for elective courses on the impact of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) and New Testament on the History and Literature of Western Civilization. (See prior posting.) So now, according to an AP report yesterday, four individual members of the 15-person Board have sent an e-mail to all school districts encouraging them to adopt one specific approach-- the National Council On Bible Curriculum In Public Schools. That curriculum has been criticized by some as promoting Protestant perspectives, and last March, Ector County, Texas, schools settled a lawsuit with an agreement not to use that curriculum in the future. (See prior posting.)

Texas A&M Sued For Discrimination By Two Iraqi Researchers

The Houston Chronicle reported last week that two Iraqi doctors who formerly worked as researchers on in vitro fertilization at Texas A&M University have sued the University, several of its units and former co-workers for religious, racial and national origin discrimination. The researchers, who fled Iraq because of opposition to their research, say that they were regularly mocked, and that animal feces and urine were thrown on their prayer rug. After an investigation, the school refused to take action on the complaints.

U.S. House Calls On Lithuania To Preserve Jewish Cemetery

On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed by a vote of 414-1 and sent to the Senate H. Con. Res. 255. The Resolution expresses strong support for the work of the United States Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad which works to preserve sacred historical sites in Eastern and Central Europe. The Resolution goes on to protest a decision by the government of Lithuania to permit commercial construction "within the perceived boundaries" of a 500-year old Jewish cemetery in Vilnius.

Maldives Supreme Court Hears Challenge To President's Religious Beliefs

In the Maldives, the country's Supreme Court is hearing a fascinating challenge to the right of President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom to stand for re-election. Under the Maldives constitution, only Muslims are entitled to citizenship. (See prior posting.) The conservative Adhaalath Party claims that Gayoom is an "infidel" because he has denied Jesus' second coming, the teaching that the Quran will ascend to heaven on judgment day and the doctrine of blood money. He also disagrees with scholars on which offenses can be pardoned and he says that veiling for women is not compulsory. His opponents also claim he has attempted to spread Christianity in the Maldives. The Election Commission ruled in Gayoom's favor, saying that he had been issued a Maldivian identity card which is only issued to Muslims, and that the challengers had not carried their burden of proving otherwise.

Minivan News reports that arguments in an appeal of the Election Commission decision began in the Supreme Court on Thursday and continue today. Gayoom's lawyers argue that the texts relied upon by the Adhaalath Party are open to interpretation. Underlying the dispute are Gayoom's attempts to creack down on Islamic extremism since a bombing in September 2007 aimed at the country's tourism industry.

Orlando's Ordinance Restricting Feeding Homeless In Parks Held Unconstitutional

In First Vagabonds Church of God v. City of Orlando, (MD FL, Sept. 26, 2008), a Florida federal district court found that Orlando's Large Group Feeding Ordinance violates the speech rights of an activist group that feeds the poor and infringes the free exercise rights of a church that holds Sunday services, including the sharing of food, in a downtown city park. The Ordinance requires a permit to feed more than 25 people in any downtown park, and limits a group to two permits per park in a 12 month period. The court held that the activist group, Orlando Food Not Bombs, was engaged in expressive conduct and that the Ordinance prevents OFNB "from communicating its Constitutionally protected speech at a meaningful location which, from time immemorial, has been the traditional public forum for free speech."

Moving to the free exercise claim, while the court had previously held that the Ordinance did not substantially burden First Vagabond Church of God's exercise of religion under Florida's Religious Freedom Restoration Act (see prior posting), it now held that nevertheless it does violate the church's First Amendment free exercise rights. The court concluded that the city has no rational basis for the Ordinance. It found that "none of the legitimate government interests proffered by the City are served by this Ordinance." Friday's Orlando Sentinel reported on the decision, describing the plaintiffs as "a motley group of activists who have been feeding the homeless."

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Reid v. Wiley, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73372 (D CO, Sept. 24, 2008), a Colorado federal district court rejected a magistrate judge's recommendation that an inmate's free exercise claim be dismissed because he failed to allege what religion he practices. The court said it is well known that plaintiff is in prison specifically because he committed highly publicized acts of terrorism connected with groups claiming to espouse Islam.

In Falls v. Alton City Jail, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72869 (SD IL, Sept. 24, 2008), a federal district judge dismissed an inmate's complaint that Islamic Imams were not allowed to visit the jail for religious services, finding that plaintiff had failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies before filing suit.

In McDowell v. Heffren, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71677 (CD IL, Sept. 22, 2008), an Illinois federal district court rejected an inmate's claims that he was disciplined for reciting a prayer, that he was fired from his prison job on the basis of religion and race, and that his religious tape was illegally confiscated.

Malaysia's High Court Upholds State Laws Prohibiting Religious Deviations

Saturday's Borneo Post reports that Malaysia's Federal Court has upheld the constitutionality of the state of Selangor's Syariah law and a similar statute enacted by the state of Terengganu. The laws prohibit a Muslim from disobeying the Sultan as head of the religion of Islam or disobeying fatwas. One of the defendants involved was Abdul Kahar Ahmad who had declared himself a prophet. Other defendants were his followers, or, in one case, a follower of the Ayah Pin sect. Defendants argued that the statutes under which they were prosecuted violate Section 11 of the Constitution that protects of the right to profess one's religion. The court held, however, that state legislatures can prohibit those who profess Islam from going against the faith's precepts.

Court Defines Funding Criteria For University of Wisconsin Student Groups

In a long-running debate over use of student activity fees to fund a Catholic student group’s activities at the University of Wisconsin- Madison, a Wisconsin federal district court has issued a declaratory judgment requiring that funding decisions be made on a viewpoint neutral case-by-case basis, instead of categorically denying funding to worship, proselytizing and activities involving sectarian religious instruction. In Roman Catholic Foundation v. Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72980 (WD WI, Sept. 24, 2008), the court dissolved an earlier preliminary injunction (see prior posting) and instead merely ruled that "the University may not categorically exclude worship, proselytizing or sectarian instruction from segregated fee funding unless it does so pursuant to a rationale that is reasonable in light of the purposes of the forum and viewpoint neutral."

Under this rationale, according to the court, the University could refuse to fund worship if it determined that

activities involving little more than an assembly of students who offer praise to a person, object or idea are less valuable to the forum than an assembly of students who engage in the back-and-forth discussion of an idea. Thus, the University may decline to fund activities involving nothing more than mechanical praise, provided that it does not simultaneously fund secular activities that lack a discussion component.

Applying this standard, the court concluded that the University had failed to adequately justify specific refusals to fund activities challenged in this case.