Religion Clause

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

California Brings Back "Bride" and "Groom" On Marriage Licenses

As previously reported, some in California are objecting to the current form of California's marriage licenses. In order to take account of now-recognized same-sex marriages, the forms merely identify the parties to be married as Party A and Party B. In response, the California Department of Public Health last week announced a change. Effective November 17, new forms will be used. They will call for information about the "First Person" and "Second Person" applying for the license. In addition, optional boxes will be available that can be checked to identify the applicants as "Bride" and "Groom". Yesterday, the AP reported on the change. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Cert. Denied In Three Cases of Interest

Yesterday, as the U.S. Supreme Court opened its Fall Term, it denied certiorari in a number of cases. (Order List). Among them were three cases that relate to law and religion issues:

In Lucero v. Texas (No. 07-1429), the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that the jurors' verdict was not affected by their reading of a passage fro the Bible during their deliberations. Christian Science Monitor reported on the denial of cert.

In Boldt v. Boldt (No. 07-1348), a change of custody case, a now-divorced mother who is a member of the Russian Orthodox Church sought to prevent her former husband-- a convert to Judaism-- from having their 12-year old son circumcised. The Oregon Supreme Court remanded the case for the trial court to decide whether the child wants the circumcision. (See prior posting.) The Seattle Times reported on the denial of cert.

In Stanton v. Arizona Life Coalition (No. 07-1366), the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the free speech rights of Life Coalition were violated when the Arizona License Plate Commission denied its application for a special "Choose Life" license plate. The AP reports on the denial of cert. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Atlanta Church Sues To Challenge Use Permit Denial

Last week in Atlanta, (GA), Kingdom First Ministries filed a lawsuit against the city of Atlanta challenging its refusal to grant the Church a special use permit. The Church wants to operate out of a building it has leased in Atlanta's Historic West End. Under Atlanta's zoning law, a permit is required in this area for churches and synagogues on lots of over one acre. The complaint filed in federal district court (full text) alleges that the denial violates RLUIPA's "equal terms", "substantial burdens" and "unreasonable limitation" provisions, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, and the 1st Amendment's free exercise and free speech protections. Alliance Defense Fund issued a release yesterday announcing the filing of the case.

California Teacher's Religious Discrimination Claim Rejected By Court

In Jalali v. Los Angeles Unified School District, (CA Ct. App., Oct. 2, 2008), a California state appellate court rejected a claim of religious and national origin discrimination in employment brought by an elementary school teacher. Plaintiff is a Muslim of Iranian descent. She claimed discrimination and harassment based on her ethnicity and religion. The court concluded that none of the instances that form the basis of the suit rise to the level of "adverse employment actions" as that term is used in California's Fair Employment and Housing Act. Yesterday's Metropolitan News-Enterprise reported on the decision.

Monday, October 06, 2008

Sikh Temple Members In Metro Portland Sue Leaders Over Building Move

In Vancouver, Washington (part of metropolitan Portland, Oregon), a lawsuit has been filed by four members of the Guru Ram Dass Sikh Community of Vancouver and Portland against leaders of the local Sikh temple (Gurdwara). Yesterday's Vancouver Columbian reports that the internal dispute is over whether the temple should move from its current location to a former athletic club building. The suit alleges that the purchase of the athletic club building should have required a vote of the temple membership. Instead it was approved by an"executive committee" which allegedly seized control of the Gurdwara. One member says that it costs $5000 to join the executive committee, and that the Gurdwara is supposed to be run by a board whose members are elected by verbal vote. The suit also alleges that the executive committee has used intimidation to impose its will on a majority of the Sangat. Meanwhile, neighbors of the athletic club are concerned about increased traffic that may result from the new use of the property.

Court Allows Native American Kindergartner Into Class With Long Hair

The Houston Chronicle reported on Friday that parents of a Needville, Texas kindergartner have been successful in convincing a federal district judge to issue a preliminary injunction ordering school officials to permit 5-year old Adriel Arocha to return to his regular school classroom with his long hair in plain sight. The ACLU of Texas had filed suit on behalf of the Native American student who insisted on wearing his hair long, in violation of the school dress code, for religious reasons. The school had offered to accommodate Arocha by allowing him to wear his hair in a single braid tucked into his shirt. He had refused, and was being taught separately from his classmates in a one-on-one setting until he complied.

Traditional Pre-Yom Kippur Ritual Rasies Some Legal Concerns

The Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur begins Wednesday evening. Legal authorities in some cities are raising questions about a pre-Yom Kippur ceremony observed by some Orthodox Jews. The ritual of Kaparot, in its traditional form, involves swinging a live chicken around one's head, symbolically transferring one's sins to it. Afterwards the chicken is slaughtered and donated as food to the poor.

The Bay Area Independent Media Center reported last week from Los Angeles that the city's Animal Services general manager is discouraging the ceremony. Many Jews, as an alternative, place money in a handkerchief, swing it over their head, and then donate it to the poor. Kaparot using animals may be illegal in Los Angeles. Under Los Angeles Municipal Code, Sec. 53.67, it is illegal to kill "any animal in any religious ... ritual ... [if not done] primarily for food purposes, regardless of whether ... such animal is subsequently consumed."

Meanwhile, according to Friday's Lower Hudson Journal-News, in Monsey, New York, many again this year plan to carry out the traditional pre-Yom Kippur ritual using chickens. In January, a group was fined for not cleaning up the area in which the chickens were slaughtered at last year's ceremony. In past years, the Hudson Valley Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals found chickens brought in for the ceremony housed in poor conditions, sometimes without food or water. However this year a new site is being used, and, according to Humane Society inspectors, those in charge are now treating the chickens well prior to slaughter.

UPDATE: The Lower Hudson Journal (Oct. 10) reported that on the day before Yom Kippur, the county Health Department issued two citations to organizers of the kaparot ceremony in Monsey, NY for washing slaughtered chicken remains down a storm sewer. Last week the Department also issued a citation after the ritual site was littered with trash and chicken remains.

IL Court Applies Abstention Doctrine In Challenge To Hiring of Priest

In Buss v. Przybylo, (IL App. Ct., Sept. 26, 2008), an Illinois appellate court applied the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine to dismiss a complaint by two members of The Shrine of Christ the King challenging a contract entered into by the church to employ Father Chester Przybylo to serve as priest for the congregation. The Shrine was established to promote the Tridentine Latin Mass. Plaintiffs alleged that Przybylo did not have the proper credentials to serve and that he had been accused in a lawsuit of sexually molesting a minor. The court concluded that determining whether a person is qualified to serve as a clergyman is a doctrinal decision. The First Amendment precludes civil courts from involving themselves in matters of church governance, faith or doctrine.

Sunday, October 05, 2008

Annual Red Mass Held Today In D.C.

Blog of The Legal Times reports that this morning five Supreme Court justices were in attendance at the 55th annual Red Mass in Washington, sponsored by the John Carroll Society. Four of the 5 sitting Catholic Justices (Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas), as well as Justice Breyer, who is Jewish, were there. Many lower court judges, ambassadors, at least one Cabinet member, law school deans and lawyers were also in attendance. The Red Mass is held each year on the Sunday before the opening of the U.S. Supreme Court's fall term, and is meant to bestow the Church's blessing on judges and civic leaders.

9th Circuit: Plaintiff Lacks Standing To Challenge Evolution Website

In Caldwell v. Caldwell, (9th Cir., Oct. 3, 2008), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed for lack of standing plaintiff's Establishment Clause challenge to certain content on an "Understanding Evolution" website created and maintained by the University of California Museum of Paleontology and funded in part by the National Science Foundation. The website, in dealing with misconceptions about evolution, says that evolution and religion are not incompatible. Plaintiff alleges that this exposes her to a government-endorsed religious message that makes her feel like an outsider.

The court, in rejecting plaintiff's claim against the University of California faculty, concluded that plaintiff's

asserted interest- informed participation as a citizen in school board meetings, debates, and elections, especially with respect to selection of instructional materials and how teachers teach the theory of evolution in biology classes in the public schools -- is not sufficiently differentiated and direct to confer standing on her to challenge the University of California's treatment of religious and anti-religious views on evolution. An interest in informed participation in public discourse is one we hold in common as citizens in a democracy.

Judge Fletcher wrote a concurring opinion to spell out in more detail why plaintiff lacks standing. He argued that her injury from offensive content on one of 840 pages in the website was de minimis.

Recent Prisoner and Institutionalized Persons Free Exercise Cases

In Gillard v. Kuykendall, (8th Cir., Oct. 2, 2008), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals held that prison authorities violated the free exercise rights of an inmate who, as a member of the New Testament House of Prayer, observed the Sabbath on Saturday. By requiring plaintiff to clean his cell on Saturday mornings, officials substantially burdened his religious beliefs which could have been accommodated by allowing him to clean his cell before or after his Sabbath. AP reported on the decision. (See prior related posting.)

In Lovelace v. Bassett, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74190 (WD VA, Sept. 27, 2008), a Virginia federal district court allowed an inmate to proceed with his claim that he was served one-third fewer calories per day during the month of Ramadan. Plaintiff alleged that this violated his rights under the free exercise clause, RLUIPA, the due process clause and the equal protection clause.

In Barnes v. Fedele, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74117 (WD NY, Sept. 26, 2008), a New York federal district court permitted a Hebrew Israelite inmate to proceed with his claim that his religious head gear was improperly taken from his cell. He was also permitted to proceed with his complaint that he was improperly denied kosher meals.

In El Badrawi v. Department of Homeland Security, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74499 (D CT, Sept. 22, 2008), a former inmate brought damage claims in part for officials' refusal to serve him meals consistent with his Ramadan observance. The court permitted him to proceed with his claim that this violated his 1st Amendment rights. It also granted him leave to amend his RLUIPA claim to sue the warden in his individual capacity. The court held that RLUIPA does not authorize a claim for damages in a suit against the warden in his official capacity.

In Richardson v. Zimmerman, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74993 (CD IL, Sept. 29, 2008), an Illinois federal district court rejected complaints about food substitutions and meal quality brought as free exercise and equal protection claims by an African Hebrew Israelite inmate who was being served a vegan diet.

Strutton v. Meade, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76608 (ED MO, Sept. 30, 2008), involved free exercise and RLUIPA claims by a Wiccan who had been civilly committed to the Missouri Sexual Offender Treatment Center. Plaintiff asserted a variety of infringements of his ability to practice his religious faith and possess religious items. While rejecting many of his claims, the court concluded that there was enough evidence for plaintiff to move ahead on his challenge to the limit on Wicca group worship to one hour per week. It also permitted him to proceed on his Establishment Clause challenge to a requirement that he participate in Christian prayer at addiction support group meetings.

In Pethe v. Henderson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75847 (ND MS, Sept. 29, 2008), a Mississippi federal district court held that plaintiff had failed to prove that he was not provided the proper diet during the Feast of Unleavened Bread that he observed as a member of the Judaian-Christian faith of the United Church of God.

In United States v. Amawi, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76097 (ND OH, Aug. 28, 2008), an Ohio federal district court rejected a Muslim prisoner's objections on religious grounds to prison rules requiring him to be strip searched after contact visits with his counsel.

In Warren v. Peterson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76453 (ND IL, Sept. 25, 2008), an Illinois federal district court allowed an African Hebrew Israelite inmate to proceed with his claim against a prison chaplain (but not against other defendants) alleging that he failed to receive the vegan meals for which he had been approved because of the chaplain's failure to process required paper work .

In Robinson v. United States Government, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76653 (ED NY, Sept. 18, 2008), a New York federal district court permitted an inmate to move ahead with his complaint against a corrections officer who allegedly broke up a Jewish high holiday service being held at a detention center and made anti-Semitic remarks to plaintiff. Claims against the Bureau of Prisons and the United States were dismissed.

In Tafari v. Annetts, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77015 (SDNY, Oct. 2, 2008), a New York federal district court agreed with a magistrate judge's recommendation to grant summary judgment to defendants in a case in which a prisoner asserted violations of his rights when he was denied kosher meals on four occasions during his transfer between institutions.

Saturday, October 04, 2008

Subpoena For Megachurch Records Turns On Technicality of IRS Bureaucracy

The Minnesota Independent and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune report that on Thursday a federal magistrate judge in Minneapolis heard arguments on whether the court should enforce an IRS subpoena for financial documents against Living Word Christian Center. The IRS is investigating loans and compensation paid by the Brooklyn Park (MN) megachurch to its pastor, Mac Hammond. While broad church-state issues, and concerns about the privacy of donors, are at stake, this aspect of the case turns on technical language imposing special procedures for IRS investigations of churches.

Internal Revenue Code Sec. 7611 , enacted in 1969, among other things requires that a church tax inquiry can be commenced only if it is authorized by "an appropriate high-level Treasury official." The section defines that as an official "whose rank is no lower than that of a principal Internal Revenue officer for an internal revenue region." However, in 1998, the IRS was restructured so that regional commissioners were eliminated and instead a system of national directors for separate types of taxpayers was set up. In this case, the investigation was authorized by the director of exempt organization examinations -- a position that is fourth in line in the IRS organization chart. Living Word Church argues that Sec. 7611 requires a higher level official to approve the summons. (See prior related posting.)

Federal Lawsuit Challenges National Day of Prayer

The Freedom from Religion Foundation filed suit on Friday in a Wisconsin federal district court challenging the federal law that creates a national Day of Prayer. (Press release.) The complaint (full text) seeks a declaratory judgment that Public Law 100-307 and Presidential and Gubernatorial Proclamations calling on citizens to pray violate the Establishment Clause. Named defendants are President Bush, White House Press Secretary Dana Perino, Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle and National Day of Prayer Task Force Chairman Shirley Dobson. The private NDP Task Force is described in the complaint as "a willful participant with state and federal officials in joint action that violates the Establishment Clause." (See prior related posting.)

British Court Grants Asylum To Muslim Converts To Christianity

Earlier this week, the Christian Post reported that a British immigration appeals court has granted asylum to a couple that had converted from Islam to evangelical Christianity. For the first time, the court recognized that the couple faced threats, including death threats, if they returned to Syria, the husband's country of origin. Six members of the U.S. Congress had sent a letter to the British appeals court in August urging it to find that the couple would face severe religious persecution if they were returned to Syria.

School Ban On Student Speech Claiming Supremacy of Religious View Struck Down

Miller v. Penn Manor School District, (ED PA, Sept. 30, 2008), involved a challenge to a Pennsylvania school district's Student Expression policy. It was brought by a high school student who was told he could not wear to school a T-shirt that promoted homeland security and was imprinted on the back, in part, with the words: "Special Issue-Resident-Lifetime License, United States Terrorist Hunting Permit..." While the court upheld most of the school district's policy-- including the prohibition on speech that incites violence-- the court issued a preliminary injunction against enforcing two portions of the policy. It found the ban on student dress or expression that "is a distraction to the educational environment" to be overbroad and vague. It also found the ban on student expressions that "seek to establish the supremacy of a particular religious denomination, sect or point of view" to be overbroad.

Court Rejects Establishment Clause Challenge To School Program

In Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Cherry Creek School District, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76938 (D CO, Sept. 8, 2008), a Colorado federal district court rejected an Establishment Clause challenge to a school district program called "40 Developmental Assets." The program listed 40 positive factors that parents are encouraged to build in their children. Plaintiffs objected to one of the listed assets-- encouraging children to spend one or more hours per week in activities in a religious institution. The court held that the overall program had a secular purpose and would not likely be perceived by non-religious parents as disapproving their beliefs. The court said that the program had to be considered as a whole, instead of dissecting out one of forty elements for separate examination. (See prior related posting.)

Federal Court Removal Denied For Counterclaims In Yeshiva Housing Case

In Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of Ramapo, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76881 (SDNY, Sept. 30, 2008), a New York federal district court rejected an attempt by defendant alleging RLUIPA and Fair Housing Act counterclaims to remove a case from New York state courts to federal court. The original lawsuit included 14th Amendment and Establishment Clause challenges to a zoning law enacted by the town of Ramapo that would allow high density adult student housing to be built in a residential area by Orthodox Jewish educational institutions. The court held that the attempt by defendant to remove the case to federal court was not timely because in fact the land at issue had been secretly transferred to the defendant seeking removal early in the litigation, and defendant should have become a party at that time. The court went on to hold that even if removal was timely, it should not be permitted because there were no federal claims alleged that justified removal. (See prior related posting.)

Friday, October 03, 2008

Prosperity Gospel May Have Helped Create Sub-Prime Mortgage Victims

On Wednesday, banks received details from the FHA on implementing the new "Hope for Homeowners" program. The program will allow some over-extended borrowers to refinance into more affordable mortgages. (CNN Money). It may be that one group of religious believers will be particularly interested. Time Magazine today suggests that the teachings of pastors preaching the Prosperity Gospel have made their followers more likely to be victims in the current mortgage crisis. The central teaching of these churches-- that God will "make a way" for the poor to enjoy the luxuries of life —encouraged followers to take out sub-prime mortgages that were beyond their means. Author Jonathan Walton says congregants were likely to believe: "God caused the bank to ignore my credit score and blessed me with my first house." Those who study the movement say it is likely that Prosperity Gospel congregants have been disproportionately victims in the current bursting of the housing bubble.

Court Finds No Viewpoint Discrimination In Teacher's Actions On Jesus Poster

In Peck v. Baldwinsville Central School District, (ND NY, Sept. 30, 2008), a New York federal district court concluded that a kindergarten teacher and a school principal did not engage in viewpoint discrimination when they displayed a student's poster on environmental issues only after folding a picture of Jesus on the poster under so that it was not visible. The court found that plaintiffs had not proven that the teacher would have treated a purely secular image that was non-responsive to a class assignment any differently. The posters were to display what students had learned from the environmental curriculum they had studied. The court also concluded that the teacher and principal had a legitimate pedagogical concern that if the poster were displayed in full, other parents might think that the school was teaching religion. The case was on remand to the court from the Second Circuit. (See prior posting.)