Religious Peyote Exemption Does Not Invalidate Federal Drug Laws

In United States v. Valazquez, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77946 (WD OK, Aug. 31, 2009), a defendant facing federal drug charges argued that the federal controlled substances laws are unconstitutional because of the exemption they grant to the Native American Church for the use of peyote. Relying on several previously decided cases, the court held that the exemption does not violate the Establishment Clause. It also rejected a 5th Amendment equal protection challenge because defendant did not show that he was similarly situated. His possession of methamphetamine was not related to his religious beliefs or practices.

Churches Sue To Prevent Noise Ordinance From Limiting Their Carillon Bells

Three churches in Phoenix, Arizona yesterday filed a federal lawsuit against the city of Phoenix challenging its noise ordinance that has been applied to limit ringing of carillon bells by local churches. The complaint (full text) in St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish Phoenix v. City of Phoenix, (D AZ, filed 9/2/2009), alleges that the noise ordinance is unconstitutionally vague. It also claims that application of the ordinance to churches violates their free speech rights and their right to free exercise of religion under both the federal and Arizona constitutions and Arizona statutory law. A release by Alliance Defense fund announcing the lawsuit criticized the ordinance for exempting ice cream trucks but not churches. Earlier this year, the clergyman of one of the plaintiff churches in this case was convicted of violating the noise ordinance and given a suspended jail sentence along with 3 years' probation. (See prior posting.)

Dutch Prosecutors Will Move Against Anti-Jewish Cartoon

According to Dutch News yesterday, the Dutch public prosecution department has announced that it will file charges against the Arab European League for a cartoon it has posted on its website. The cartoon depicts two men in business suits discussing how to increase the numbers killed in the Holocaust. Prosecutors say the cartoon 'insults Jews because of their race and/or religion." It suggests that Jews themselves invented the idea that 6 million were killed during World War II. The cartoon was an old one that had been taken off the group's website three years ago. However it was posted again after Dutch prosecutors refused to prosecute the TV program Nova and Dutch politician Geert Wilders over republication of cartoons insulting the Prophet Muhammad. Prosecutors say those cartoons did not violate Dutch law because they targeted Muhammad, not Muslims in general. The Dutch Supreme Court drew this distinction in a case decided earlier this year. (See prior posting.) AEL does not think any of the cartoon should be subject to prosecution.

Canadian Court Rejects Challenge To Quebec's New Religious Survey Courses

In the Canadian province of Quebec, a trial court judge has rejected a challenge by Christian parents to the mandatory new course in grades 1 through 11 in Quebec schools that teaches about a broad range of world religions. The Ethics and Religious Culture course covers Christianity, Judaism, aboriginal spirituality, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism. (See prior posting.) It replaces parents' choice of one of three separate courses that focused on Catholic or Protestant thought, or moral instruction. Yesterday's National Post reports on the decision by a Drummondville Superior Court. Justice Jean-Guy Dubois wrote that "the court does not see how the ... course limits the plaintiff's freedom of conscience and of religion for the children when it provides an overall presentation of various religions without obliging the children to adhere to them." During the trial, one mother testified that it was confusing for her son to learn about Islam while he was still forming his own Catholic spirituality.

Remarks At Kennedy Memorial Service Raise Issue On Mormon Temple Zoning

According to yesterday's Belmont (MA) Citizen-Herald, remarks delivered by Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch at the memorial service for Sen. Edward Kennedy last Friday (full text) have caused some former litigants to question a decision handed down in 2001 by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Here is what Hatch said:

There was another time when the Mormon church was nearing completion of its temple here in Boston. Belmont , I think. I was approached by several people working in the temple and informed that the city would not allow a spire to be placed on the top of the temple with an angel on top of it as is customary on Mormon temples. I immediately called Ted and asked for help. Not long after that conversation, he called me back and said, "All of western Massachusetts will see the Angel Gabriel on the top of the Mormon temple. (LAUGHTER) Though I was tempted to leave it alone, I had to inform Teddy it was actually the Angel Maroni....

It turns out that the question of whether a special zoning permit would be granted for the church to build its 85-foot high steeple was litigated all the way to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. In Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, (MA Sup. Jud. Ct., 2001), Massachusetts' high court held that a state law limiting zoning restrictions on the use of land for religious purposes (the "Dover Amendment") precluded the "unreasonable" height restriction that Belmont's zoning laws imposed.

Now those who opposed the Temple construction are asking whether Kennedy influenced the Supreme Judicial Court's decision. They say Hatch's reference to the time construction was nearing completion would put his call to Kennedy after the February 2000 decision by the Middlesex Superior Court to reverse the decision of Belmont's zoning board of appeals and ban the steeple. The only determination left after that point was that by the Supreme Judicial Court. A spokesperson for the court, however, says they had no interaction with Kennedy and he did not influence the justices in the temple case.

Obama Hosts Iftar Dinner With Interesting Guest List

Last night at the White House, President Obama hosted an iftar dinner marking the Muslim observance of Ramadan. This follows a precedent begun by President Bill Clinton and continued by President George W. Bush (New York Times, Huffington Post). The guest list for last night's dinner was particularly interesting-- cabinet members, members of Congress, ambassadors from counties with significant Muslim populations (including Israel), members (including Jewish and Christian members) of the President’s Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships, and various Muslim notables. (Washington Post.) Included were Marine Lt. Cmdr. Abuhena Saifulislam (who has given the prayer at President Bush's Ramadan dinner), and ACLU lawyer Jameel Jaffer whose lawsuit has forced the White House to release secret documents on C.I.A. interrogations and detention. Among the guests highlighted in President Obama's remarks (full text) at the dinner was Nashala Hearn from Muskogee, Oklahoma, whose Justice Department-backed lawsuit vindicated her right to wear a hijab (headscarf) to school.

"Classical" Charter School Sues Challenging Ban On Use of Religious Texts

Yesterday, an Idaho charter school filed a federal lawsuit against members of the Idaho Public Charter School Commission and other state officials, challenging a Commission order banning the use of the Bible or any other religious documents or texts in public charter school classrooms. Plaintiff, the Nampa Classical Academy, had developed its entire curriculum in a classical, liberal arts format, using primary texts-- secular and religious-- as a method of educating its students. The complaint (full text) in Nampa Classical Academy v. Goesling, (D ID, filed 9/1/2009), alleges that a majority of the planned texts are secular. It says that the Academy, which is about to open for its first year of operations, has no intent to use religious texts in devotional manner, and will not be teaching religious tenets. Religious materials, like secular documents, will be used to study western civilization in classes such as history, literature, art or music. The complaint sets out five causes of action: procedural due process, free speech, establishment clause and equal protection clause violations, as well as violations of the state statute setting out procedures for issuing a notice of defect to charter schools. Alliance Defense Fund announced the filing of the lawsuit. (See prior related posting.)

Federal Community Service Agency Designates This Week As "Interfaith Service Week"

The Corporation for National & Community Service (a federal agency) announced yesterday that President Obama's "United We Serve" initiative has designated Aug. 31 through Sept. 6 as "Interfaith Service Week." The week honors efforts of faith-based organizations working across religious lines to strengthen communities. The press release highlighted a number of specific interfaith projects being carried out across the country this week.

Consent Order Settles Suit On In-School Posters Announcing Prayer Events

In May, a Tennessee federal district court issued a preliminary injunction barring Wilson County (TN)'s Lakeview Elementary School from enforcing a broadly written school speech policy to suppress religious references on posters made by students and parents to publicize "See You At the Pole" and National Day of Prayer events at the school. (See prior posting.) On Monday, Alliance Defense Fund announced that the lawsuit has been settled with the entry of a Consent Order (full text). The order makes the preliminary injunction permanent and requires that any new policy restricting religious speech on posters must be reasonable, viewpoint neutral and in accordance with federal law. The Wilson County School Board also paid $50,000 of plaintiffs' attorneys fees and paid nominal damages of $1. The settlement come just in time for this year's See You At the Pole event scheduled nationally for Sept. 23.

Q&A On Faith Healing and the Law Posted

The Pew Forum on Monday posted a Q&A interview on Faith Healing and the Law featuring George Washington University Professor Robert W. Tuttle. Among other issues, Tuttle reflects on the Establishment Clause questions posed by state law exemptions from abuse and neglect statutes for those who rely on faith healing for their children.

Civil Rights Division Will Return To Traditional Agenda Without Ending Religious Discrimination Initiatives

Today's New York Times reports that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is pressing major changes in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division by refocusing on its traditional role that emphasized racial discrimination cases. The Division will again focus on high-impact cases involving voting rights, housing, employment discrimination, bank lending and Congressional redistricting. This shift was widely expected when Holder's nomination was announced. The Bush administration had shifted Division resources to focus on issues such as religious discrimination and human trafficking. (See prior posting.) Holder does not plan to dismantle these efforts, but instead to hire enough additional attorneys to do everything.

Christian Groups May Not Intervene To Challenge Plan B Decision

A New York federal district court has denied a motion by three conservative Christian groups to intervene in a lawsuit in order to challenge a ruling by the court requiring the Food and Drug Administration to make Plan B emergency contraceptives available to 17-year olds without a prescription. (See prior posting.) The groups attempted to intervene after the FDA decided not to appeal the court's ruling. (Full text of Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene.) In Tummino v. Hamburg, (ED NY, Aug. 27, 2009), the court held that the groups lack standing to intervene, and that their motion to intervene was not timely filed. The court rejected arguments by Concerned Women for America, Christian Medical & Dental Associations, and Christian Pharmacists Fellowship International that they had suffered informational and procedural injuries, that the court's decision will force pharmacists to sell misbranded drugs, that they had third party standing and that the change in status of the prescription drug gave them standing. Finally, the court rejected intervenors' motion for an extension of time to appeal. LifeSite News yesterday reported on the decision, as did the New York Law Journal.

Court Says Injunction Request Is Moot In Suit Against History Teacher

In C. F. v. Capistrano Unified School District, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76932 (CD CA, July 27, 2009), a California federal district court refused to grant injunctive and declaratory relief to a high school student and his parents in their suit against high school history teacher James Corbett. In an earlier decision (see prior posting), the court found that the teacher's statement in class characterizing Creationism as "superstitious nonsense" violated the Establishment Clause. However now the court concluded that the proposed injunction to bar Corbett from expressing any disapproval of religion while acting in his official capacity as a public school employee was overbroad. It also held that any request for a narrower injunction is moot since plaintiff is no longer in Corbett's class. Finally it concluded that a declaratory judgment would serve no useful purpose.

Former Miss California USA Sues Claiming Religious Discrimination

Former Miss California USA, Carrie Prejean, yesterday filed a lawsuit in a California state court against Miss California pageant officials accusing them of religious discrimination, as well as defamation , disclosure of private medical facts and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Prejean's title was taken away in June 2009, allegedly for breach of contract. The complaint (full text) in Prejean v. Lewis, (Los Angeles Superior Ct., filed 8/31/2009), alleges in part that defendants violated California's Unruh Civil righs Act (CA Civil Code Sec. 51) by conspiring to have Prejean dismissed as Miss California USA because she insisted on publicly expressing her religious beliefs opposing same-sex marriage. Entertainment Tonight reports on the lawsuit. (See prior related posting.)

Scotish Tribunal Asks European Court If Volunteer Is Covered By Discrimination Directive

In Scotland, a Glasgow employment tribunal has ruled that a case should be referred to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary determination of whether EU's employment discrimination directive applies to a volunteer. Today's Scotsman reports on the religious discrimination charges filed by Church of Scotland minister Mahboob Masih, who for six years co-hosted a radio show for Awaz FM on a voluntary basis. He was terminated after a show featuring a "lively" debate about religion and the views of a prominent Muslim speaker. He was directed to apologize on air, which he did. However he refused an additional demand that he go to a local mosque and offer a second apology.

6th Circuit Rejects Discrimination Claim, But Finds Standing For Funding Challenge

In Pedreira v. Kentucky Baptist Homes For Children, Inc., (6th Cir., Aug. 31, 2009), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on two separate groups of claims against KBHC, a faith-based agency providing residential treatment facilities and other services for abused and neglected children. It rejected an employment discrimination claim under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act brought brought by a Family Specialist who had been fired because she was a lesbian. The court said that plaintiff introduced no evidence to show how that constituted discrimination based on her religion.

The second group of claims were challenges under the Establishment Clause to the flow of state funds to KBHC. The court concluded that plaintiffs lacked standing as federal taxpayers to challenge the channeling of federal child care funds to KBHC by the state of Kentucky. It is not enough that the federal statutes merely failed to prohibit the unconstitutional use of these funds. However, the court held that plaintiffs do have standing as state taxpayers to challenge the $100 million of state funds paid to KBHC to care for children. Americans United issued a press release announcing the decision. (See prior related posting.)

Resignation of Scranton Bishops May Reflect Rejection of Anti-Obama Wing

At a press conference (video) yesterday, the Catholic diocese of Scranton, Pennsylvania announced that 63-year old Bishop Joseph F. Martino has resigned for health reasons. (Full text of Bishop Martino's statement.) Also retiring is 77-year old Auxiliary Bishop John M. Dougherty. Cardinal Justin F. Rigali, Archbishop of Philadelphia, was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI as temporary as Apostolic Administrator of the Scranton Diocese. (Full text of Cardinal Rigali's statement.)

Politics Daily yesterday posted an extensive analysis of the political implications of the resignations. Martino had become politically controversial during the 2008 election when he announced that vice-presidential candidate Joe Biden, a native of Scranton, would be denied communion because of his pro-choice views if he tried to receive communion at a church in the Scranton diocese. He also had a letter read during masses last October telling parishioners that voting for a pro-choice politician was equivalent to endorsing "homicide." Martino has also clashed with Catholic universities in his diocese and has irritated others with his abrasive style. The resignations may reflect growing dissatisfaction by fellow-bishops and the Pope with the anti-Obama rhetoric of some U.S. bishops.

Suit Challenging "40 Developmental Assets" Program Is Settled

Last October, a federal district court rejected an Establishment Clause challenge to the Cherry Creek, Colorado School District's "40 Developmental Assets" program. (See prior posting.) In a suit brought by Freedom from Religion Foundation, plaintiffs objected to one of the 40 positive behaviors that parents were encouraged to build in their children-- encouraging children to spend one or more hours per week in activities in a religious institution. Subsequently FFRF filed a new complaint, this time linking the 40 Developmental Assets to a Lutheran, scripture-based program. Yesterday FFRF announced that the lawsuit has been settled. (Full text of settlement agreement.) "Asset 19" in the program will be changed to read: "Intergenerational Activities – Young person spends one or more hours per week in activities with civic, social, governmental, scientific, educational, charitable, faith based or secular (non-religious) organizations."

3rd Circuit: Harassment Case Alleges Sexual Orientation, Not Religious, Discrimination

In Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc., (3d Cir., Aug. 28, 2009), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a Title VII religious discrimination claim by plaintiff who alleged that his employer harassed him because he did not conform to his co-workers' religious beliefs. Plaintiff is a gay male, and, he alleged, several of his co-workers considered that contrary to being a good Christian. The court concluded that plaintiff was harassed not because of religion, but because of his sexual orientation. However the court allowed plaintiff, an effeminate male, to move ahead with his "gender stereotyping" claim. Plaintiff had adduced enough evidence to go to the jury on whether that, rather than his sexual orientation, was the reason for actions directed at him. Courthouse News Service yesterday reported on the decision.

Parishioners Come Armed To Defend Pastor Who Prays For Obama's Death

In Tempe, Arizona yesterday, members of the Faithful Word Baptist Church came to services armed with guns after Pastor Steven Anderson said he and his congregation have received death threats. The threats came in response to a sermon by Anderson earlier this month titled "Why I Hate Barack Obama", in which Anderson said that he prays for Obama's death. (recording of sermon.) Yesterday Anderson says he wants this to occur by natural causes: "I don't want him to be a martyr, we don't need another holiday," he said. All of Anderson's recent sermons are on the church's website. ABC15 News today reports that Anderson yesterday welcomed his armed parishioners, saying that "guns are a great deterrent." The night after Anderson's Aug. 16 anti-Obama sermon, one of his parishioners, Christopher Broughton, carried an AR-15 semi-automatic assault rifle outside President Obama's speech to the VFW at the Phoenix Convention Center.