the law and public policy of the Commonwealth of Virginia prohibit a college or university from including "sexual orientation," "gender identity," "gender expression," or like classification, as a protected class within its non-discrimination policy, absent specific authorization from the General Assembly.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Sunday, March 07, 2010
Virginia's AG Says State Colleges Cannot Ban LGBT Discrimination
Saturday, March 06, 2010
Taxpayer Lacks Standing To Challenge Church's Use of School; Parent May Have Standing
UPDATE: In Henley v. Cleveland Board of Education, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21876 (March 10, 2010), the court denied a motion for reconsideration.
9th Circuit Says Christians In Indonesia Face Likely Persecution, Torture
Friday, March 05, 2010
Qualified Immunity Applies To RFRA Claim Growing Out of Drug Search
Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Barring Noise Prosecutions Against Church Bells
The Court finds, for the purposes of preliminary injunction analysis, that the NoiseAlliance Defense Fund issued a release announcing the decision.
Ordinance is neither precise enough nor clear enough to be considered narrowly tailored. The Noise Ordinance does not contain an objective standard, such as a decibel level, under which loud, disturbing, and unnecessary sounds are targeted to the exclusion of sounds that are not loud, disturbing, and unnecessary. Also, the exemptions from the Noise Ordinance are a scattershot list, providing an exception for government vehicles, noncommercial public addresses, ice cream trucks (or other uses of hand-held devices playing "pleasing melodies"),and nighttime street work, but not considering any other types of sound to be exempt from coverage. The government's interest in preventing the disturbance of its citizens by noise could be achieved by other, less restrictive means.
Religious Questionnaire To City Candidates Draws Criticism
4th Circuit Upholds Church's Discrimination and RLUIPA Claims
the evidence presented at trial of the County's anti-church animus was very strong. The evidence thus supports the jury’s conclusion that (1) the County intentionally discriminated against Reaching Hearts on a prohibited ground, and (2) the County imposed or implemented a land use regulation in a manner that imposed a substantial burden on Reaching Heart’s religious exercise, without satisfying the standard of strict scrutiny.Yesterday's Washington Post reports on the decision.
State Employees Say Boss Judged Them On the Quality of Their Religious Faith
Thursday, March 04, 2010
Anti-Evolutionists Tying Curriculum Efforts To Global Warming Skepticism
Church Lacks Standing To Sue Over Investigation of Its Loud Music
Plaintiffs have not articulated any concrete or particularized injury. FBC continues to hold services with the music of its choosing. There is no allegation that the nature of FBC's religious services changed in any way in response to the investigation of the noise complaints. There is no specific allegation that any right to free association has been impinged or that any church members were deterred from worshiping.... There is no allegation that FBC was ordered to stop their music or that anyone was ticketed, charged, or fined. In fact, Waterford's disturbing the peace ordinance, which they challenge as vague and overbroad, was not enforced against them. Further, the evidence suggests that Waterford does not have a present intention to enforce the ordinance against them....
Although the complaint alleges that the actions of the prosecutor and police have caused a "chilling effect" -- such bare allegations are insufficient to confer standing.
Texas Republicans Support Religious Reference At Public Gatherings and On Government Buildings
The use of the word "God", prayers, and the Ten Commandments should be allowed at public gatherings and public educational institutions, as well as be permitted on government buildings and property.The advisory measure passed by an overwhelming 95.14% majority, with 11.1% of the state's registered voters participating. (Official results.) Apparently this same measure will appear on the November general election ballot. (San Marcos Daily Record). Yesterday American Atheists issued a press release warning that if this proposal is formally adopted in the state, "it will prove to be unconstitutional and expensive for state taxpayers."
Key Christian Conservative Defeated In Texas Board of Education Primary
Public Housing Authority Says No More On-Site Church Services
UPDATE: The Dallas News reports that on Thursday, the Dallas Housing Authority reversed its decision. Religious services at Audelia Manor will resume on Sunday.
Bristish Airport Refuses Boarding To Muslim Women Who Rejected Body Scan
Suit Challenges State Civil Rights Agency Jurisdiction Over Small Religiously-Motivated Group
Cert. Denied In Establishment Challenge To Religious Displays In Postal Unit
Evangelical Group Wins Compromise In Settlement of Suit Over Tax Exemption
In the settlement in Eagle Mountain International Church Inc. v. Tarrant Appraisal District, Tex. Dist. Ct., No. 342-235701-09, agreed judgment entered 2/16/10, the county agreed to have KCM's employment records reviewed by a CPA who specializes in religious organizations. The county accepted as sufficient a report from the CPA that KCM's employee compesation was reasonable, without the underlying data going to the government.