Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Israeli Bus Company Fined After Driver Enforces Sex Segregation
In Israel on Wednesday, the Rishon Lezion Magistrate Court fined Egged, Israel's largest bus company, the equivalent of $1,070 (US) for requiring a woman passenger to sit in the back of the bus while the bus traveled through a Haredi (strictly Orthodox) neighborhood. According to JTA, a driver told the passenger (an Orthodox woman who objected to sitting in the back) that only the rabbis decide whether a bus route is segregated or not. Egged issued a statement saying that the driver was not reflecting the company's views. Last January, Israel's High Court of Justice ruled that while sex-segregated buses serving strictly Orthodox communities could continue on a strictly voluntary basis, a bus operator may not request or order a woman to sit in the back of the bus. (See prior posting.)
Friday, December 09, 2011
White House Hosts Hanukkah Reception
As reported by Haaretz, the White House yesterday hosted its annual Hanukkah reception, with President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and their wives in attendance along with some 550 guests. In his remarks (full text), the President, after noting the reception was a bit early this year, said in part:
This year, we have to recognize the miracles in our own lives. Let’s honor the sacrifices our ancestors made so that we might be here today. Let’s think about those who are spending this holiday far away from home -– including members of our military who guard our freedom around the world. Let’s extend a hand to those who are in need, and allow the value of tikkun olam to guide our work this holiday season.
This is also a time to be grateful for our friendships, both with each other and between our nations. And that includes, of course, our unshakeable support and commitment to the security of the nation of Israel.Yahoo! News has additional photos of the reception.
9th Circuit Hears Arguments In California Proposition 8 Case
AP reports that yesterday the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard two sets of arguments on different aspects of Perry v. Brown, the case challenging the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8 that barred same-sex marriage in the state. One set of arguments (audio of arguments) focused on whether now-retired Judge
Vaughn Walker who presided over the district court trial should have disclosed that he was in a long-term relationship with a male partner, arguably a fact bearing on his impartiality in deciding the case. The second set of arguments (audio of arguments) dealt with whether the court should unseal video recordings of the trial made by Judge Walker.
Egyptian Military Moves To Limit Influence of Islamists On New Constitution
AP reported Wednesday that Egypt's ruling military leaders, concerned with the strong showing by Islamic parties in the first round of parliamentary elections, have decided to appoint a new council to assure that the 100-member constituent assembly appointed to draft a new constitution will be representative of all religions, professions, and political parties. In response to a question, Gen. Mukhtar Mulla agreed that this move is designed to limit the influence of Salafis who want to impose strict Islamic law in Egypt. AFP reports that the Muslim Brotherhood, objecting to the move, says the army is trying to marginalize Parliament in the writing of the new constitution.
Kazakhstan Muslim Students Plan To Sue Over Hijab Ban
Radio Free Europe reports today that in Kazakhstan, 8 female Muslim students plan to sue Saqtaghan Baishev University because it refuses to allow them to attend classes wearing hijabs (head scarves). The University says that its regulations are consistent with Kazakhstan's recently-enacted Law on Religions and Religious Organizations. Attorneys for the students say the University's regulations violate Kazakhstan's constitution which guarantees citizens the right to freely practice their religion.
Group Seeks Input On Tax Issues Relating To Religious Non-Profits
Last January, the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability at the request of Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, formed an independent national commission to study accountability and policy issues affecting churches and religious organizations. (See prior posting.) Yesterday that commission, the Commission on Accountability and Policy for Religious Organizations, announced that it has added a public input page to its website.That page asks members of the public for input on 17 separate issues relating to taxation of churches and conditions imposed on religious organizations claiming non-profit tax status.
Controversy Over Nativity Scene In Texas Town
This year it is in the small town of Athens, Texas that a controversy over a nativity scene on public property has erupted. KYTX News reported yesterday that the Keep Athens Beautiful Committee decorates downtown Athens with reindeer, Santa, carolers, a Christmas tree and a nativity scene. The Freedom from Religion Foundation has objected, but County Judge Richard Sanders says the display is legal because it includes secular as well as religious elements. FFRF alternatively wants to put up its own sign reading in part: "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell." County Commissioner Joe Hall says he will fight to keep the nativity scene, declaring: "This nation is a Christian nation regardless of what those fruit loops and fruitcakes in Washington D.C. say. Hell will freeze over before I vote to have it removed."
Tennessee School Board Agrees To Settlement In Challenge To Religious Practices
The ACLU of Tennessee announced yesterday that the Sumner County (TN) Board of Education has agreed to enter into a consent decree in a lawsuit charging that the Sumner County schools have engaged in a pattern of promoting religion. (See prior posting.) The proposed Consent Decree (full text) in ACLU of Tennessee v. Sumner County Board of Education is summarized by the ACLU as follows:
school officials can no longer promote their personal religious beliefs to students. Religious symbols and items may not be displayed in a place publicly visible to students. Teachers may supervise student clubs but can no longer participate in their activities and school officials cannot encourage or solicit prayer at school functions. School events may not be held in religious venues except under certain limited conditions and the schools can no longer take field trips to religious sites. Only family members will be permitted to visit schools at lunchtime. Groups wishing to distribute materials to students, such as members of Gideons International, must do so in a neutral way, minimizing contact with students and no groups will be given preferential access to students. Non-religious clubs shall not have “chaplain” positions and all course materials and choral music must have a clear pedagogical purpose.The Tennessean, reporting on the settlement said school officials emphasized that under it students will still be able to pray at school, study the Bible during lunch breaks, organize religious clubs, wear religious jewelry and hold See You At the Pole prayer events so long as teachers do not participate in or lead the activity.
Canada's High Court Hears Arguments Over Whether Muslim Witness Can Wear Full-Face Veil
The National Post reports that yesterday the Supreme Court of Canada heard oral arguments in a case raising the issue of whether a Muslim woman who is alleging childhood sexual abuse by her cousin and her uncle should be allowed to testify wearing a full-face veil. An Ontario court ordered the woman during a preliminary hearing to remove her niqab. The Globe and Mail captures the flavor of the argument:
There was no mistaking the impatience in Supreme Court of Canada Justice Morris Fish’s voice when he demanded the name of a single lawyer who would willingly cross-examine a witness whose face was concealed by a veil.
“Some blind lawyers that I know,” responded David Butt, counsel to the sexual assault complainant seeking to testify from behind an Islamic niqab....
It was that kind of day at the landmark hearing, where the court must determine whether religious ritual and observance can trump the right of an accused to a fair trial. Judges clashed repeatedly with lawyers who sought to rank one right ahead of the other – particularly Mr. Butt.
The judges questioned not only the fairness of allowing the defendant, N.S., to hide her facial expressions during cross-examination, but whether two diametrically opposed rights can ever be reconciled.
Thursday, December 08, 2011
USCIRF Takes Formal Steps To Prepare To Close Down
As previously reported, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom is now scheduled to go out of business on Dec. 16. Under Sec. 209 of the International Religious Freedom Act, the Commission was originally scheduled to terminate on Sept. 30. However two continuing resolutions have temporarily extended its life while a House-passed 2-year re-authorization bill (HR 2867) has been awaiting passage in the Senate. However the Senate has not acted, apparently because of a "hold" placed on the bill by Senate majority whip, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.). According to a report last month in CQ Weekly, the hold stems from a dispute over an entirely unrelated matter. Durbin wants Congress to appropriate funds for the federal government to buy up an unused maximum-security prison in his district in Illinois and turn it into a federal facility. Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-VA), the sponsor of the USCIRF re-authorization bill, is currently chair of the House Appropriations Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee that is responsible for funding federal prisons.
Now that it appears increasingly unlikely that USCIRF's life will be extended beyond Dec. 16, the Government Services Administration has notified the Commission that it must take steps to prepare for closure of the agency. In response USCIRF has adopted a Resolution (full text) authorizing the archiving of records and steps to close the agency in compliance with federal law if a last minute extension is not enacted. Copies of the Resolution were sent to the President, the Secretary of State and all members of Congress. CNS News yesterday reported on these developments. [Thanks to Pew Sitter for the lead.]
Now that it appears increasingly unlikely that USCIRF's life will be extended beyond Dec. 16, the Government Services Administration has notified the Commission that it must take steps to prepare for closure of the agency. In response USCIRF has adopted a Resolution (full text) authorizing the archiving of records and steps to close the agency in compliance with federal law if a last minute extension is not enacted. Copies of the Resolution were sent to the President, the Secretary of State and all members of Congress. CNS News yesterday reported on these developments. [Thanks to Pew Sitter for the lead.]
Lawyer, Client Face Sanctions For Anti-Catholic Statements In Legal Memorandum
The St. Paul (MN) Pioneer Press reports that U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Nancy Dreher yesterday issued show-cause orders to attorney Rebekah Nett and her client Naomi Isaacson threatening to impose sanctions on them for bigoted anti-Catholic statements contained in a legal memorandum they filed with the court last month. The memorandum was written by Isaacson, but signed by Nett. It called Judge Dreher, another judge and two bankruptcy trustees "dirty Catholics" and said the courts are "composed of a bunch of ignoramus, bigoted Catholic beasts that carry the sword of the church." It accused one of the bankruptcy trustees of being "a Jesuitess" with a "track record of lies, deceit, treachery and connivery." In all, Judge Dreher cited 10 passages containing religious slurs, allegations of conspiracy and the like that were included in the memorandum. A hearing is scheduled for Jan. 4 for Nett and Isaacson to show cause why they should not be fined up to $10,000 each and be ordered to write public apologies. The court is also proposing that attorney Nett be required to attend at least 30 hours of ethics training.
UPDATE: The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights announced on Dec. 9 that it is filing a formal complaint against attorney Rebekah Nett with the Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board and a formal grievance against her with the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation.
UPDATE2: The St. Paul Pioneer Press reported on 12/14 that Naomi Isaacson's filings in response to the court's show cause order contain "even more religious slurs than the one prompting the judge's warning."
UPDATE: The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights announced on Dec. 9 that it is filing a formal complaint against attorney Rebekah Nett with the Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board and a formal grievance against her with the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation.
UPDATE2: The St. Paul Pioneer Press reported on 12/14 that Naomi Isaacson's filings in response to the court's show cause order contain "even more religious slurs than the one prompting the judge's warning."
Fired Muslim Drivers Sue Car Rental Company For Religious Discrimination
AP reports that in Seattle, Washington yesterday, 25 Somali Muslims who previously worked as drivers for Hertz Corp. at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport have filed a state court lawsuit charging religious discrimination. Hertz fired the drivers when they refused to clock out for their daily prayer breaks. As previously reported, apparently Hertz originally agreed they would not need to clock out, but changed that policy when a number of the drivers failed to return promptly after their prayers.
Coalition Seeks Information On Faith-Based Hiring By Federal Grantees
The Coalition Against Religious Discrimination (CARD) is a group of over 50 religious, civil rights and public policy organizations that has been encouraging the Obama administration to require all recipients of federal grants and contracts to observe a strict non-discrimination policy in hiring for positions funded with federal dollars. However, despite statements supporting non-discrimination President Obama has not rescinded Executive Order 13279 issued in 2002 by President George W. Bush permitting religious organizations that receive federal funds to use religious criteria in their hiring. (See prior posting.) Joshua DuBois, head of he White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships has said that the question of whether a grantee may engage in faith-based hiring is being handled on a case-by-case basis. So yesterday, according to a press release from Americans United, CARD wrote identical letters (full text) to the Faith-Based Partnership Office in each of over a dozen federal departments and agencies seeking more information on this case-by-case approach. The letters ask for details of the review process, the criteria applied and the facts and results in each case.
6 Republican Candidates Address Republican Jewish Coalition
Six Republican presidential candidates addressed the Republican Jewish Coalition in Washington, D.C. yesterday. Candidate Ron Paul was not invited by the RJC because of his views on Israel, though Paul says those views are being characterized unfairly. (CNN report.) Videos of the address by each of the six candidates are available from this page on C-Span's website. The candidates focused heavily on U.S. policy toward Israel and the threat to Israel and the U.S. of a nuclear Iran. Reporting on the candidate forum, the New York Times said:
One reason Republicans seek to sound serious on Israel is to appeal to evangelical Christians who make up large portions of the Republican primary voters in South Carolina and the caucusgoers in Iowa. Down the road, they also know that Jewish voters are critical to victory in general election swing states like Pennsylvania and Florida.
But just as the candidates have staked out hard positions on Israel, they have also moved to the right on other issues, a shift that Democrats say calls into question their appeal to a wide swath of Jewish voters.
Wednesday, December 07, 2011
New Rick Perry Ad Attacks Obama on Religion
Candidate Rick Perry released an 30-second ad today attacking what he called "Obama's war on religion." In the ad, he says:
I’m not ashamed to admit that I’m a Christian, but you don’t need to be in the pew every Sunday to know there’s something wrong in this country when gays can serve openly in the military but our kids can’t openly celebrate Christmas or pray in school.
As president, I’ll end Obama’s war on religion. And I’ll fight against liberal attacks on our religious heritage.
Faith made America strong. It can make her strong again.The Washington Post's report on the ad carries the full text and the video of the ad. CBS News reports on criticism of the ad by the Log Cabin Republicans, a group that represents the interests of gay and lesbian Republicans. The Perry ad was also strongly criticized by the Interfaith Alliance and and the Human Rights Campaign.
Rabbi, Former Jail Chaplain, Settles Paying $2500 Fine For Taking Gift
In a settlement with the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board on Monday, Rabbi Leib Glanz, former New York City jail chaplain, agreed to a $2500 fine. As reported by the New York Times and JTA, the fine grew out of a much-publicized 2008 Bar Mitzvah celebration that Glanz helped inmate Tuvia Stern hold for his son in the Manhattan Detention Complex ("The Tombs") after a judge refused to grant Stern a furlough to attend his son's Bar Mitzvah outside of jail. (See prior posting.) While Glanz cleared the Bar Mitzvah celebration with Department of Corrections officials, publicity about the event created a furor that led to Glanz's resignation and disciplinary action against several corrections officials. At the Bar Mitzvah celebration, Stern presented Glanz with a plate and a silver Kiddush cup worth $500. Glanz says he initially refused the gifts, but then took them in order to avoid offending the family after being pressed to do so by the family and other guests. Glanz, who was once a powerful Satmar rabbi with political connections, has been charged in an unrelated case with theft and conspiracy for taking $22,000 in Section 8 housing subsidies.
Religious Marriage Without License Is Merely Voidable, and Not Terminated By Religious Divorce Alone
In Mussa v. Palmer-Mussa, (NC App., Dec. 6, 2011), a North Carolina appeals court held that the marriage of defendant Nikki Palmer-Mussa to Juma Mussa was void because at the time of the marriage Nikki was married to another man. In 1997, Nikki married Khalil Braswell in a ceremony that complied with Islamic law, but without a marriage license from the state and without an imam officiating. Later the same year Nikki divorced Braswell in accordance with Islamic law by returning the dowry and shortly thereafter married Juma Mussa. The court, however, concluded that while the marriage to Braswell without a license and not performed by a member of the clergy was voidable under North Carolina law as it stood at the time of the marriage, the marriage was not void. A religious divorce alone did not suffice to terminate the voidable marriage. Judge Bryant dissented, arguing that Juma, who was seeking an annulment, failed to present direct evidence that proved the existence of a valid prior marriage. The Greensboro (NC) News-Record reports on the decision.
Secy. State Clinton Says Religious Objections Do Not Trump LGBT Human Rights
Speaking yesterday at a United Nations event in Geneva, Switzerland marking International Human Rights Day (full text of remarks), U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered a strong call for protection of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender rights. She said in part:
Now, raising this issue, I know, is sensitive for many people and that the obstacles standing in the way of protecting the human rights of LGBT people rest on deeply held personal, political, cultural, and religious beliefs.....
The ... perhaps most challenging, issue arises when people cite religious or cultural values as a reason to violate or not to protect the human rights of LGBT citizens. This is not unlike the justification offered for violent practices towards women like honor killings, widow burning, or female genital mutilation. Some people still defend those practices as part of a cultural tradition. But violence toward women isn't cultural; it's criminal. Likewise with slavery, what was once justified as sanctioned by God is now properly reviled as an unconscionable violation of human rights.
In each of these cases, we came to learn that no practice or tradition trumps the human rights that belong to all of us. And this holds true for inflicting violence on LGBT people, criminalizing their status or behavior, expelling them from their families and communities, or tacitly or explicitly accepting their killing.
Of course, it bears noting that rarely are cultural and religious traditions and teachings actually in conflict with the protection of human rights. Indeed, our religion and our culture are sources of compassion and inspiration toward our fellow human beings.....LGBT rights advocates called the speech historic. (Dallas Voice.) The State Department also issued a Fact Sheet outlining more broadly its accomplishments in promoting LGBT human rights. Meanwhile at the White House yesterday, President Obama issued a Memorandum to executive departments and agencies (full text) "directing all agencies engaged abroad to ensure that U.S. diplomacy and foreign assistance promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons."
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
Male Nurse Says Order Not To Treat Muslim Female Patients Was Sex Discrimination
The Dearborn Patch today follows up on a report last month by the Detroit News on a federal sex discrimination lawsuit against the city of Dearborn, Michigan filed by a male nurse who was fired from the city's health department. Nurse John Benitez Jr. was told by his female supervisor not to treat women wearing Muslim headscarves because their male family members did not want a male treating female patients. However Benitez disregarded this instruction when a doctor told him to treat a female patient. Benitez was subsequently fired. The suit, filed last month, claims his firing violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act because it was motivated in part by his gender.
11th Circuit Rejects Suit By Mardi Gras Demonstrator Against Police
In Bethel v. City of Mobile, (11th Cir., Dec. 2, 2011), the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a claim by a Mardi Gras demonstrator that his arrest for disorderly conduct violated his free exercise, 4th Amendment and the equal protection rights. Orlando Bethel was standing on a sidewalk in Mobile, Alabama, along the Mardi Gras parade route with a sign reading: "GOD hates you SINners repent in JESUS name live SIN free." A woman also at the parade called police complaining that Bethel was harassing her 13-year old daughter, calling her a "whore" and a"slut." The court concluded that this gave officers probable cause to arrest Bethel, so that they had qualified immunity as to Bethel's 4th Amendment claim. It also found Bethel presented no evidence that his arrest violated his 1st or 14th Amendment rights. (See prior related posting.)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)