In McKinnon v. Watson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133550 (WD VA, Dec. 17, 2010), a Virginia federal district court granted summary judgment to prison officials who had been sued by a Nation of Islam prisoner for delay in approving his religious diet request. The court held that defendants had qualified immunity.
In Norman v. Small, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133507 (SD CA, Dec. 14, 2010), an inmate alleged among other claims that his free exercise rights were violated because prison policy allowed him to be searched in front of female officers in violation of his Islamic religious beliefs. A federal magistrate judge recommended (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133557, July 29, 2010) that this claim be dismissed both for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and for failure to state a claim. The district court adopted the recommendation to dismiss on exhaustion grounds, but said it would therefore not address whether the claims should also be dismissed on the merits.
In Wilder v. Sutton, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134677 (SD IL, Dec. 21, 2010), an Illinois federal district court permitted a Wiccan prisoner to go to trial on claims that his rights under the 1st and 14th Amendments were violated when his requests for materials that would permit him to practice his religion were ignored and he was told he could not practice his religion in prison. However the court held that damages are not available in either individual or official capacity claims under RLUIPA (which he also invoked) and that his claim for an injunction is moot because he had been transfered to a different facility.
In Cullen v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134882 (WD PA, Dec. 21, 2010), a Pennsylvania federal district court rejected that an inmate's complaint that his free exercise rights were infringed when his refusal to take part in a Therapeutic Community program was used against him in considering his parole. Plaintiff failed to allege his religious beliefs or how they were impinged. He alleged primarily that program required that inmates inform on one another's behaviors and prohibited the use of the words "God" or "Higher Power" in program sessions.
In Young v. Ericksen, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134606 (ED WI, Dec. 20, 2010), a Wisconsin federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate who was held in protective custody and denied the right to attend group Jum'ah services, as well as being denied a visit by a volunteer imam, to proceed with his free exercise and RLUIPA claims.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query wiccan wisconsin. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query wiccan wisconsin. Sort by date Show all posts
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Clark v. Small, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23731 (SD CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal district court permitted an inmate to proceed with his claim that he was not permitted to celebrate Ramadan, but dismissed his equal protection and due process challenges.
In Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23848 (ED CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates failed to state a claim against the California State Personnel Board in connection with their complaint that no Wiccan prison chaplains were hired for their facility.
In Jackson v. Boucaud, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23760 (SD GA, March 15, 2010), a Georgia federal district court accepted a federal magistrate's recommendations (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125893, Dec. 31, 2009) and dismissed an inmate's claims that his rights were infringed when he was not permitted to borrow in inter-library loan a copy of The Bible Code. He failed to allege how denial of the book infringed his sincerely held religious beliefs.
In Holley v. Johnson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23898 (WD VA, March 16, 2010), a Virginia federal magistrate judge permitted an inmate to proceed with challenges under RLUIPA and the due process clause to confiscation of religious materials of the Nation of Gods and Earths (also known as the Five Percent Nation of Islam).
In Boles v. Newth, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126028 (D CO, Nov. 13, 2009), a Colorado federal magistrate judge concluded that damage to an inmate's religious objects and religious books did not create a meaningful burden on his practice of religion.
In Borzych v. Frank, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25194 (WD WI, March 17, 2010), a Wisconsin federal district judge rejected an inmate's claim that his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and his rights under RLUIPA, were violated by a prison policy that prohibits practitioners of Odinism from having runes.
In McChesney v. Hogan, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25717 (ND NY, March 18, 2010), a New York federal district court accepted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25705, Feb. 26, 2010), and permitted a civilly committed offender who is an atheist,to proceed on a claim for injunctive relief, but not for damages, on his complaint that material used in the sexual offender treatment program were premised on religious principles.
In Damron v. Sims, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25166 (SD OH, March 17, 2010), an Ohio federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25158, Jan. 27, 2010) and dismissed claims by prisoners who were Christian Separatists that they have been denied in various ways the free exercise of their religion. The court held that plaintiffs pointed only to general policies and failed to allege particular instances in which their rights were infringed.
In Brown v. Michigan Department of Corrections, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25396 (ED MI, March 18, 2010), a Michigan federal district court adopted a federal magistrate's recommendations (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126067, Oct. 28, 2009) and rejected both on statute of limitations grounds and on the merits an inmate's argument that his free exercise rights were violated when he was not permitted to talk about his religious beliefs during the Assaultive Offender Program.
In Anderson v. Craven, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25140 (D ID, March 16, 2010), an Idaho federal district court refused to dismiss an inmate's claim that his rights were violated when, as a condition of parole, he was forced to attend the Therapeutic Community program which, allegedly, is religion based.
In Funzie v. Little, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25771 (MD TN, March 18, 2010, a Tennessee federal district court adopted a magistrate's findings (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25768, Jan. 12, 2010) and dismissed plaintiff's objections to the seizure and screening of his religious materials by the security threat group.
In Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23848 (ED CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates failed to state a claim against the California State Personnel Board in connection with their complaint that no Wiccan prison chaplains were hired for their facility.
In Jackson v. Boucaud, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23760 (SD GA, March 15, 2010), a Georgia federal district court accepted a federal magistrate's recommendations (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125893, Dec. 31, 2009) and dismissed an inmate's claims that his rights were infringed when he was not permitted to borrow in inter-library loan a copy of The Bible Code. He failed to allege how denial of the book infringed his sincerely held religious beliefs.
In Holley v. Johnson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23898 (WD VA, March 16, 2010), a Virginia federal magistrate judge permitted an inmate to proceed with challenges under RLUIPA and the due process clause to confiscation of religious materials of the Nation of Gods and Earths (also known as the Five Percent Nation of Islam).
In Boles v. Newth, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126028 (D CO, Nov. 13, 2009), a Colorado federal magistrate judge concluded that damage to an inmate's religious objects and religious books did not create a meaningful burden on his practice of religion.
In Borzych v. Frank, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25194 (WD WI, March 17, 2010), a Wisconsin federal district judge rejected an inmate's claim that his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and his rights under RLUIPA, were violated by a prison policy that prohibits practitioners of Odinism from having runes.
In McChesney v. Hogan, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25717 (ND NY, March 18, 2010), a New York federal district court accepted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25705, Feb. 26, 2010), and permitted a civilly committed offender who is an atheist,to proceed on a claim for injunctive relief, but not for damages, on his complaint that material used in the sexual offender treatment program were premised on religious principles.
In Damron v. Sims, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25166 (SD OH, March 17, 2010), an Ohio federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25158, Jan. 27, 2010) and dismissed claims by prisoners who were Christian Separatists that they have been denied in various ways the free exercise of their religion. The court held that plaintiffs pointed only to general policies and failed to allege particular instances in which their rights were infringed.
In Brown v. Michigan Department of Corrections, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25396 (ED MI, March 18, 2010), a Michigan federal district court adopted a federal magistrate's recommendations (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126067, Oct. 28, 2009) and rejected both on statute of limitations grounds and on the merits an inmate's argument that his free exercise rights were violated when he was not permitted to talk about his religious beliefs during the Assaultive Offender Program.
In Anderson v. Craven, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25140 (D ID, March 16, 2010), an Idaho federal district court refused to dismiss an inmate's claim that his rights were violated when, as a condition of parole, he was forced to attend the Therapeutic Community program which, allegedly, is religion based.
In Funzie v. Little, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25771 (MD TN, March 18, 2010, a Tennessee federal district court adopted a magistrate's findings (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25768, Jan. 12, 2010) and dismissed plaintiff's objections to the seizure and screening of his religious materials by the security threat group.
Thursday, September 17, 2015
Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Ladner v. Hull, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118269 (ED VA, Sept. 3, 2015), a Virginia federal district court dismissed a Born-Again Christian inmate's complaint that there were not church services or Bible study sessions available to him. It found that a faith representative was available, and that plaintiff could file requests for other religious needs.
In Cooper v. Sowers, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118181 (D MD, Sept. 4, 2015), a Maryland federal district court dismissed a Catholic inmate's complaint that he was not provided a meatless diet on Ash Wednesday and on Fridays during Lent. Prison policy provides no special meal adjustments for those days and leaves it up to each inmate to decide what food to abstain from.
In Mootry v. Flores, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118632 (ED CA, Sept. 4, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was denied Jumu'ah prayer services because of a policy barring inmate ministers from leading inmate religious services without a supervising chaplain or volunteer.
In Sherman v. Jess, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119282 (ED WI, Sept. 8, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed a complaint by a Pagan Wiccan inmate that he did not get his religious text, Book of Shadows, while in temporary lockup.
In Mitchell v. Cate, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120059 (ED CA, Sept. 8, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Christian inmate's complaint that he was not allowed to participate in religious activities or speak to a religious adviser during the time he was subject to a restricted modified program.
In Applegate v. Kokor, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120107 (ED CA, Sept. 8, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend a 252-page complaint alleging "various religious claims against eight Defendants," saying "it is neither time-efficient nor fair to other litigants for the Court to hunt through Plaintiff's Complaint for camouflaged cognizable claims."
In Robinson v. Cate, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120870 (ED CA, Sept. 9, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended that a Muslim inmate be permitted to move ahead with free exercise and equal protection claims for injunctive relief on his complaint that the Religious Meat Alternate Program fails to provide a fully Halal diet that is comparable to the fully Kosher diet provided to Jewish inmates.
In Moon v. Unterreiner, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121171 (ED MO, Sept. 11, 2015), a Missouri federal district court dismissed on various procedural grounds a suit by an inmate held under home confinement with electronic monitoring who claimed that his free exercise rights are infringed by requiring him to state the times he is going to and leaving his mosque for prayer.
In Cooper v. Sowers, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118181 (D MD, Sept. 4, 2015), a Maryland federal district court dismissed a Catholic inmate's complaint that he was not provided a meatless diet on Ash Wednesday and on Fridays during Lent. Prison policy provides no special meal adjustments for those days and leaves it up to each inmate to decide what food to abstain from.
In Mootry v. Flores, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118632 (ED CA, Sept. 4, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was denied Jumu'ah prayer services because of a policy barring inmate ministers from leading inmate religious services without a supervising chaplain or volunteer.
In Sherman v. Jess, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119282 (ED WI, Sept. 8, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed a complaint by a Pagan Wiccan inmate that he did not get his religious text, Book of Shadows, while in temporary lockup.
In Mitchell v. Cate, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120059 (ED CA, Sept. 8, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Christian inmate's complaint that he was not allowed to participate in religious activities or speak to a religious adviser during the time he was subject to a restricted modified program.
In Applegate v. Kokor, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120107 (ED CA, Sept. 8, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend a 252-page complaint alleging "various religious claims against eight Defendants," saying "it is neither time-efficient nor fair to other litigants for the Court to hunt through Plaintiff's Complaint for camouflaged cognizable claims."
In Robinson v. Cate, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120870 (ED CA, Sept. 9, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended that a Muslim inmate be permitted to move ahead with free exercise and equal protection claims for injunctive relief on his complaint that the Religious Meat Alternate Program fails to provide a fully Halal diet that is comparable to the fully Kosher diet provided to Jewish inmates.
In Moon v. Unterreiner, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121171 (ED MO, Sept. 11, 2015), a Missouri federal district court dismissed on various procedural grounds a suit by an inmate held under home confinement with electronic monitoring who claimed that his free exercise rights are infringed by requiring him to state the times he is going to and leaving his mosque for prayer.
Monday, September 03, 2018
Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Streater v. Allen, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145087 (ED TX, Aug. 24, 2018), a Texas federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that during a two-week lock down he was unable to attend religious services and was denied hot meals for at least a week.
In Ramos v. Malloy, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145147 (D CT, Aug. 27, 2018), a Connecticut federal district court dismissed, with leave to file an amended complaint, an inmate's lawsuit claiming he did not receive a book about religion, even though copies were mailed to him twice.
In Cordero v. Kelley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145804 (D NJ, Aug. 22, 2018), a New Jersey federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with claims that religious tracts he purchased to give his family and friends were confiscated.
In Buie v. Mitchell, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146159 (ED WI, Aug. 28, 2018), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed an inmate's lawsuit that complained about the manner of preparation of certain kosher meals.
In Guilliot v. Harmon, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145095 (ND TX, Aug. 27, 2018), Texas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146273, July 25, 2018) and permitted a Wiccan inmate who was serving a sentence for receiving child pornography to move ahead with his claim that his rights under RFRA were violated when he was denied access to a Rider-Waite Tarot deck — a tarot deck that includes artistic depictions of non-sexualized nudity.
In Galvan v. Sterrett, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146339 (SD IL, Aug. 28, 2018), an Illinois federal district court allowed a Catholic inmate to move ahead with his complaint that his permission to attend Protestant religious services as well as Catholic ones was revoked.
In Gaston v. Marean, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146578 (ED CA, Aug. 28, 2018), a California federal district court held that a Ratafarian inmate's additional assertions regarding the impact of cutting off his dreadlocks would allege a substantial burden on religious exercise, contrary to a magistrate's original conclusion (see prior posting). Thus the court provided the opportunity to file an amended complaint.
In Loufer v. Carr, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147006 (D KA, Aug. 29, 2018), a Kansas federal district court gave an inmate 30 days to show why his sketchy complaint regarding a religious diet should not be dismissed.
In Masek v. Chastain, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148013 (ED MO, Aug. 30, 2018), a Missouri federal district court dismissed a complaint by plaintiff, who is civilly detained after being found not guilty by reason of insanity for the murder of his father, that he was deprived of a copy of the Bible for one week.
In Wright v. Lassiter, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148188 (WD NC, Aug. 30, 2018), a North Carolina federal district court allowed a Rastafarian inmate to move ahead with claims of confiscation of religious books and items, and forced removal from a vegan diet.
In Helm v. Allen, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149080 (WD KY, Aug. 30, 2018), a Kentucky federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was denied a Catholic Bible and mail from the Dtnamic Catholic Institute.
In Ramos v. Malloy, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145147 (D CT, Aug. 27, 2018), a Connecticut federal district court dismissed, with leave to file an amended complaint, an inmate's lawsuit claiming he did not receive a book about religion, even though copies were mailed to him twice.
In Cordero v. Kelley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145804 (D NJ, Aug. 22, 2018), a New Jersey federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with claims that religious tracts he purchased to give his family and friends were confiscated.
In Buie v. Mitchell, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146159 (ED WI, Aug. 28, 2018), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed an inmate's lawsuit that complained about the manner of preparation of certain kosher meals.
In Guilliot v. Harmon, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145095 (ND TX, Aug. 27, 2018), Texas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146273, July 25, 2018) and permitted a Wiccan inmate who was serving a sentence for receiving child pornography to move ahead with his claim that his rights under RFRA were violated when he was denied access to a Rider-Waite Tarot deck — a tarot deck that includes artistic depictions of non-sexualized nudity.
In Galvan v. Sterrett, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146339 (SD IL, Aug. 28, 2018), an Illinois federal district court allowed a Catholic inmate to move ahead with his complaint that his permission to attend Protestant religious services as well as Catholic ones was revoked.
In Gaston v. Marean, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146578 (ED CA, Aug. 28, 2018), a California federal district court held that a Ratafarian inmate's additional assertions regarding the impact of cutting off his dreadlocks would allege a substantial burden on religious exercise, contrary to a magistrate's original conclusion (see prior posting). Thus the court provided the opportunity to file an amended complaint.
In Loufer v. Carr, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147006 (D KA, Aug. 29, 2018), a Kansas federal district court gave an inmate 30 days to show why his sketchy complaint regarding a religious diet should not be dismissed.
In Masek v. Chastain, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148013 (ED MO, Aug. 30, 2018), a Missouri federal district court dismissed a complaint by plaintiff, who is civilly detained after being found not guilty by reason of insanity for the murder of his father, that he was deprived of a copy of the Bible for one week.
In Wright v. Lassiter, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148188 (WD NC, Aug. 30, 2018), a North Carolina federal district court allowed a Rastafarian inmate to move ahead with claims of confiscation of religious books and items, and forced removal from a vegan diet.
In Helm v. Allen, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149080 (WD KY, Aug. 30, 2018), a Kentucky federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was denied a Catholic Bible and mail from the Dtnamic Catholic Institute.
Sunday, November 12, 2006
This Week's Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Derby v. Worsham, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81216 (ED MO, Nov. 6, 2006), a Missouri federal district court permitted a Wiccan prisoner to proceed with his claim that his free exercise rights were infringed when prison officials confiscated black candles and other ritual items, saying they were used in "darker worship styles".
In Modena v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81205 (D MN, Nov. 3, 2006), a Minnesota federal district court rejected a prisoner's claim that federal law requiring the collection of a DNA sample from federal prisoners violates his right to the free exercise of religion.
In Fayson v. Earle, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81567 (D DE, Nov. 7, 2006), a Delaware federal district court permitted a Muslim prisoner to proceed with her claim under the First Amendment and RLUIPA that she had been denied a Halal diet. However it granted summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff's free exercise, equal protection and RLUIPA claims that Muslims were denied adequate access to religious services and instruction.
In Miniero v. Craven, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82315 (D ID, Nov. 9, 2006), a prisoner claimed that he was unlawfully required him to complete a religious-oriented rehabilitation program in order to be considered for parole. An Idaho federal district court denied the prisoner's request for a temporary restraining order, finding that plaintiff has now been offered the opportunity to participate in an alternative non-religious program.
In Borzych v. Frank, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82289 (WD WI, Nov. 9, 2006), a prisoner who followed Odinism challenged the denial of his right to keep his Thor's Hammer emblem which he wore around his neck for spiritual protection. Prison authorities had banned the emblem because of its association with disruptive groups. A Wisconsin federal district court permitted plaintiff to proceed with his free exercise, RLUIPA and establishment clause claims challenging the prison's policy. It dismissed a number of other constitutional claims asserted by plaintiff.
In Modena v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81205 (D MN, Nov. 3, 2006), a Minnesota federal district court rejected a prisoner's claim that federal law requiring the collection of a DNA sample from federal prisoners violates his right to the free exercise of religion.
In Fayson v. Earle, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81567 (D DE, Nov. 7, 2006), a Delaware federal district court permitted a Muslim prisoner to proceed with her claim under the First Amendment and RLUIPA that she had been denied a Halal diet. However it granted summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff's free exercise, equal protection and RLUIPA claims that Muslims were denied adequate access to religious services and instruction.
In Miniero v. Craven, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82315 (D ID, Nov. 9, 2006), a prisoner claimed that he was unlawfully required him to complete a religious-oriented rehabilitation program in order to be considered for parole. An Idaho federal district court denied the prisoner's request for a temporary restraining order, finding that plaintiff has now been offered the opportunity to participate in an alternative non-religious program.
In Borzych v. Frank, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82289 (WD WI, Nov. 9, 2006), a prisoner who followed Odinism challenged the denial of his right to keep his Thor's Hammer emblem which he wore around his neck for spiritual protection. Prison authorities had banned the emblem because of its association with disruptive groups. A Wisconsin federal district court permitted plaintiff to proceed with his free exercise, RLUIPA and establishment clause claims challenging the prison's policy. It dismissed a number of other constitutional claims asserted by plaintiff.
Sunday, September 10, 2006
This Week's Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Gillard v. Kuykendall, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62291 (WD AR, Aug. 30, 2006), an Arkansas federal district judge accepted the recommendation of a magistrate judge and refused to dismiss a prisoner's claim that his free exercise rights were violated when he was required to mop and clean his cell every day, including his Sabbath day.
In Mark v. Gustafson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62376 (WD WI, Aug. 30, 2006), a Wisconsin federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Wiccan prisoner whose "magic seals" were removed from his prison cell walls and door by prison officials.
In Shaka Zulu Acoolia v. Angelone, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62574 (WD VA, Sept. 1, 2006), a Virginia federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Rastafarian prisoner who was refused a strict vegan diet and instead served the prison's vegetarian Alternative Entree Menu that includes eggs, milk and sweets.
In Jackson v. Department of Correction, 2006 Mass. Super. LEXIS 389 (Middlesex County, Aug. 25, 2006) a Massachusetts Superior Court judge found that the state's Department of Corrections violated RLUIPA by failing to provide an Imam to perform jum'ah services at MCI-Shirley every Friday, and by having female correctional officers in non-emergency situations pat-frisk male Muslim inmates (including touching of the inmate's genital or anal areas). These practices were also found to violate a Massachusetts statute that requires equal treatment of prisoners who are not being disciplined. (See prior related posting.)
In Kaufman v. McCaughtry, (7th Cir., Sept. 7, 2006), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's holding that prison officials who denied atheists the right to form a study grope were entitled to qualified immunity because prior precedents were not clear on whether atheism was to be treated as a religion.
In Mark v. Gustafson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62376 (WD WI, Aug. 30, 2006), a Wisconsin federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Wiccan prisoner whose "magic seals" were removed from his prison cell walls and door by prison officials.
In Shaka Zulu Acoolia v. Angelone, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62574 (WD VA, Sept. 1, 2006), a Virginia federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Rastafarian prisoner who was refused a strict vegan diet and instead served the prison's vegetarian Alternative Entree Menu that includes eggs, milk and sweets.
In Jackson v. Department of Correction, 2006 Mass. Super. LEXIS 389 (Middlesex County, Aug. 25, 2006) a Massachusetts Superior Court judge found that the state's Department of Corrections violated RLUIPA by failing to provide an Imam to perform jum'ah services at MCI-Shirley every Friday, and by having female correctional officers in non-emergency situations pat-frisk male Muslim inmates (including touching of the inmate's genital or anal areas). These practices were also found to violate a Massachusetts statute that requires equal treatment of prisoners who are not being disciplined. (See prior related posting.)
In Kaufman v. McCaughtry, (7th Cir., Sept. 7, 2006), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's holding that prison officials who denied atheists the right to form a study grope were entitled to qualified immunity because prior precedents were not clear on whether atheism was to be treated as a religion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)