Fifth Circuit Finds China's Actions Are Not Religious Persecution

The Sept. 6 issue of Christianity Today carries a story about the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion (Aug.9, 2005) in Li v. Gonzales. The Court of Appeals upheld a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which refused to permit a Chinese Christian who claimed religious persecution to remain in the United States. At issue were the provision of 8 USC Section 1253(h), which are now found in 8 USC Sec. 1231(b)(3). They permit withholding of an alien's removal from the country if the alien would be persecuted at home on account of his or her religion. Li had been prosecuted in China for holding an illegal religious gathering and conducting an underground church. The court found that Li had been punished at home for violating China's law on unregistered churches and not because of his religion. It said:

The evidence suggests that the Chinese government condones, or rather tolerates, the Christian faith and seeks to punish only the unregistered aspect of Li’s activities. There is therefore reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence to support the BIA’s decision that Li’s punishment was for his activities and not for his religion.... Clearly, we are faced with a complicated issue in this case. The issue in this case is perplexing not only because it involves affairs of a foreign state that are contrary to our fundamental ideals but also because the line between religious belief and religious activity here is indeed a fine one and it is colored by sensitive political and religious concerns. However, while we may abhor China’s practice of restricting its citizens from gathering in a private home to read the gospel and sing hymns, and abusing offenders, like Li, who commit such acts, that is a moral judgment not a legal one.

[Thanks to Brad M. Pardee via Religionlaw listserv for the lead.]