Monday, October 24, 2005

Native American Prisoner Can Proceed On Sweat Lodge Claim

In Prayer Feather Farrow v. Stanley (D NH, Oct. 20, 2005), a New Hampshire prisoner who is a practicing member of the Lakota Sioux Nation and the Native American Sacred Circle claimed eight separate violations of his right to practice his religion: (1) preventing him from possessing tobacco for prayer and ceremonial use; (2) denying him access to medicines and herbs for ceremonial use; (3) prohibiting him from engaging in daily group prayer with other members of the Sacred Circle; (4) failing to supply him with Native American foods on religious holidays; (5) refusing to allow him to wear feathers at all times; (6) barring the various Native American nations represented within the Sacred Circle from meeting as sub-groups; (7) failing to employ a Native American consultant to shape the DOC's religious policies; and (8) denying him access to a sweat lodge for ritual purification.

Plaintiff claimed that prison officials violated RLUIPA, the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The federal district court granted summary judgment to state prison officials on all but one of the claims. On plaintiff's claim that he has been denied access to a sweat lodge for ritual purification, the court denied the state's motion for summary judgment and permitted the claim to move to trial. The court held, however, that defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's claim for monetary damages.