Two court decisions involving prisoners seeking religious accommodation of non-mainstream religious beliefs have recently been handed down.
In McClain v. Rogers, (7th Cir., Nov. 30, 2005), a practitioner of Asatru (a religion tied to White supremacist beliefs) sued claiming that prison guards prohibited him from praying alone in the prison yard. He also complained that the chaplain does not allow Asatruars to worship in groups, though members of other religions are may do so. The court held that while there may be an issue of whether the prisoner's praying alone violated the prison rule against "meetings or gatherings" in the prison yard, the issue was not properly raised.
In Smith v. Haley, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30454 (MD Ala, Dec. 1, 2005), an Alabama federal district court faced claims brought by a practitioner of Odinism, an ancient pre-Christian faith whose theology is based on historic Icelandic sagas and runic mysticism. By the time the case got to trial, most of his accommodation requests had been met. However, prison officials refused to permit him to use and possess a small quartz crystal, and the prisoner sued, among other things, for damages because this denied him his right to freely practice his religion. The court held, however, that even if the refusal to allow the prisoner to possess a crystal violated his right under RLUIPA, the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity because Smith's right to possess a crystal as part of his practice of Odinism was not clearly established by any law at the time of the actions in question.
