9th Circuit Denies Prisoner Claim Regarding Halal Meat

Last week in Watkins v. Shabazz, (9th Cir., May 22, 2006), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court and denied a prisoner's claims under the 1st and 14th Amendments and RLUIPA that his ability to practice his Muslim religion was being infringed. The prisoner, who requested Halal meat, was given a choice by the prison to eat the nutritionally equivalent meat substitute provided by the prison, or to find an outside religious organization to contract with the prison to provide Halal meat. The court agreed with the findings below that these alternatives did not substantially burden the prisoner's practice of his religion andthat he was not discriminated against on the basis of his Muslim faith.