RLUIPA Claim and Constitutionality Upheld By 9th Circuit

Yesterday in Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter, (9th Cir., Aug. 1, 2006), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Sutter County, California to issue a Sikh temple a conditional use permit to permit the construction of a temple on a parcel of land zoned as "agricultural". The county had denied permits twice, under conditions that significantly lessened the prospect that the group would be able to find any acceptable location. The court found that the county thereby imposed a substantial burden on Guru Nanak's exercise of religion in violation of RLUIPA. The Court also held that RLUIPA's religious land use provisions are a constitutional exercise of Congress' powers to enforce the 14th Amendment, saying "RLUIPA is a congruent and proportional response to free exercise violations because it targets only regulations that are susceptible, and have been shown, to violate individuals’ religious exercise." Today's Marysville-Yuba City Appeal Democrat covers the decision. [Thanks to Anthony Picarello via Religionlaw listserv for the information.]