Free Exercise Challenge To Migratory Bird Treaty Act Eagle Protection Rejected

In United States v. Tawahongva, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67947 (D. AZ, Sept. 11, 2006), an Arizona federal district court rejected the motion of a member of the Hopi Indian tribe seeking dismissal of the indictment that charged him with illegally possessing a golden eagle in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Defendant Berra Tawahongva claimed that his rights to free exercise of his religion would be infringed by forcing him to obtain a permit in order to gather eagles. The court held that Tawahongva lacked standing to challenge the permit system as applied to him, since he never attempted to obtain a permit. Insofar as he is asserting a facial challenge to the permit system, Tawahongva failed to show that his free exercise of religion was substantially burdened. Moreover, the United States has established a compelling interest in the protection of golden eagles and has demonstrated that the permit system is the least restrictive means of serving that interest.