Security At Red Mass Does Not Violate Religious Protesters' Rights

In Mahoney v. United States Marshals Service, (DDC, Sept. 27, 2006), the federal district court for the District of Columbia this week upheld security arrangements imposed by the US Marshals Service on the Red Mass held each year in St. Matthew's Cathedral just before the first Monday opening of the U.S. Supreme Court's session. A Presbyterian minister, a fellow-Christian, and a Christian religious organization had claimed that the restrictions on protesters violated their First Amendment speech rights and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The plaintiffs wished to carry signs supporting the public display of the Ten Commandments. The court found that the challenged security restrictions were narrowly drawn, content neutral time, place and manner regulations, and that they did not impose a substantial burden on plaintiffs' free exercise of religion. Demonstrators had adequate alternative channels available to them. [Thanks to Blog from the Capital for the lead.]