In Fabricius v. Maricopa County, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67423 (D AZ, Sept. 14, 2006), an Arizona federal district court rejected a free exercise claim by a jail inmate who alleged that the fact that female guards could see him using the toilet and shower violates the principles of modesty required by his Catholic religion. It also rejected his Establishment Clause claim based on allegations of the jail's lengthy playing of music that advanced Judeo/Christian religious doctrines.
In Massingill v. Livingston, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68249 (ED TX, Aug. 9, 2006), a Texas federal magistrate judge recommended rejection of free exercise and RLUIPA claims of a prisoner who was a member of the Israyl Identity faith. The prisoner challenged the application of the prison's grooming requirements to him, seeking to grow a beard and shoulder-length hair. He also wanted to be kept separate from inmates of other races, and to have his meals for Saturday delivered to him on Friday so that prison employees who serve him would not have to work for him on Saturday.
In Vega v. Lantz, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69120 (D CT, Sept. 26, 2006), a Connecticut federal district court permitted claims by a Muslim prisoner to proceed against certain of the defendants. The plaintiff had charged denial of daily congregate prayer, of Jumah services when no Islamic chaplain is present, a lack of timely Ramadan prayers,, insufficient calories in the meals during Ramadan, inability to purchase Islamic items, no Halal meats, no inmate chaplains, denial of his request for circumcision, improper handling of the Quran, and discrimination.
In Hill v. Cruz, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69094 (SD TX, Sept. 26, 2006), a Texas federal district court dismissed for lack of proof a Muslim prisoner's claim that processed American cheese containing pork enzymes is placed in non-pork food entrees at the prison.
In Jordan v. Carr, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68753 (ND IA, Sept. 22, 2006), an Iowa federal district court rejected a jail inmate's claim that he should be allowed to attend both Christian and Muslim religious services.
In Jonas v. Schriro, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69427 (D AZ, Sept. 25, 2006), an Arizona federal district court rejected First Amendment and RLUIPA claims by a Native American prisoner who complained that he was prohibited from engaging in pipe ceremonies, smudging, wearing of colored headbands, and using a sweat lodge.
