Yesterday in Weinbaum v. City of Las Cruces, New Mexico, (D NM, Nov. 9, 2006), a New Mexico federal district court dismissed an Establishment Clause challenge to the official symbol of the city of Las Cruces. Plaintiffs alleged that the city's adoption of the symbol, three crosses surrounded by a sunburst, amounted to an endorsement of religion. In a long opinion that extensively examines the Supreme Court's establishment clause jurisprudence, the history of the cross and of the city of Las Cruces, the court held that there is no indication that the city acted with a religious purpose in adopting and using its symbol. It found that "the Symbol
communicates the secular message that the City's name means 'The Crosses' and links the City to its historic roots." So "a reasonable observer of the Symbol would understand that the crosses represent, symbolically, this uniquely named geopolitical subdivision, rather than an endorsement of Christianity." Today's Las Cruces Sun-News reports on the decision.
