In D.C. Circuit, Navy Chaplain Loses Constructive Discharge Suit

Today in Veitch v. England, (DC Cir., Nov. 28,. 2006), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit rejected a claim by a fundamentalist Protestant Navy chaplain that he had been constructively discharged in violation of his First Amendment rights. Philip Veitch claimed that he was being required to endorse "pluralism" in his religious practices, and that this violated his religious beliefs. The majority, however, held that Veitch lacked standing to raise this issue because his resignation from the Chaplain Corps was voluntary. In addition, it found that the Navy did not act unreasonably in refusing to permit Veitch to withdraw his resignation. Judge Rogers' concurring opinion said that because Veitch's resignation was voluntary, there was no need to discuss, as the majority did, whether Veitch met the burden of showing that he was constructively discharged. [Thanks to How Appealing for the lead.]