In Ohio yesterday, in contests for five seats on the State Board of Education, four of the winners oppose the teaching of intelligent design in science courses. (Election results.) In District 7, the race in which the science curriculum issue was most important, Thomas Sawyer soundly defeated incumbent Deborah Owens Fink, who supported the Board's proposed standard and lesson plan for 10th-grade biology courses that called for a "critical analysis" of evolutionary theory. (See prior posting.) In District 2, John Bender defeated Intelligent Design supporter Kathleen McGervey. (See prior posting.) In Districts 4 and 8, the winners G.R. Schloemer and Deborah L. Cain both oppose the teaching of Intelligent Design in science classes. (McClatchy Tribune Business News; Canton Repository).
The Cleveland Plain Dealer this morning reports that the four candidates were backed by Help Ohio Public Education (HOPE), a group created by scientists who were upset at the Board's attempts to introduce intelligent design into science classes. HOPE specifically recruited former Akron mayor Thomas Sawyer-- the successful District 7 cnadidate-- to run. Only in District 3 did a supporter of Intelligent Design in science classes win election to the state school board. At least that appears to be the position of winner Susan M. Haverkos.
