A lawsuit filed yesterday in a Texas federal district court on behalf of 8 parents of high school students challenges the constitutionality of a course in The Bible in History and Literature offered by two Odessa, Texas schools. The courses use the King James version of the Bible as a text. They follow the curriculum developed by the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools, after the school superintendent rejected an alternative curriculum developed by the Bible Literacy Project that is generally seen as more inclusive. (See prior posting and and an article from yesterday's Wall Street Journal.)
The complaint in Moreno v. Ector County Independent School District, (WD TX, filed May 16, 2007) (full text) alleges that the curriculum that was adopted promotes a particular religious interpretation of the Bible-- ignoring or dismissing other viewpoints-- and does not reflect current and reputable Biblical scholarship. It teaches the Bible as literal, historical truth and presents a religious interpretation of American history that does not reflect objective scholarly standards.
The suit was filed on behalf of the parents by the American Civil Liberties Union (press release) and People for the American Way (press release). ACLU lawyer Daniel Mach charged that the course "is about proselytizing one set of religious beliefs to the exclusion of others. Students who don't share those beliefs should not be treated as outsiders by their own schools." Also, he said that the course "requires students to give 'true' or 'false' answers to questions that are a matter of religious faith."
