Yesterday, a New Mexico federal district court refused to grant summary judgment to New Mexico State University head football coach Hal Mumme in religious discrimination cases filed against him by several Muslim football players. In Ali v. Mumme I, (D NM, June 5, 2007), the court found that issues of fact remain in the free exercise and equal protection claims by player Jacob Wallace that Mumme encouraged an atmosphere hostile to Islam, that he instituted Christian prayer by the team in a way coercive to Muslims, and that Mumme's food policy disregarded Muslim dietary restrictions.
In Ali v. Mumme II, (D NM, June 5, 2007), the court found that issues of fact remain in the free exercise and equal protection claims by players Mu'ammar Ali, Anthony Thompson and Vincent Thompson. They claim that they were discharged from the football team because of their Muslim faith, and that Mumme had engaged in actions having a coercive effect on their religious beliefs. Today's Las Cruces Sun-News reports on the decisions. (See prior related posting.)
