Canadian Court Permits Suit Against Jehovah's Witnesses To Proceed

On Friday, the Alberta Court of Appeals held that a father can proceed with his wrongful death lawsuit against the Watchtower Society and its elders for allegedly misrepresenting the nature of chemotherapy and blood transfusion treatment to his 17 year old daughter, telling her that they would not cure her leukemia. In Hughes (Estate) v. Brady, (Alb. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2007), the court held that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms provisions protecting religious freedom do not protect the right to impose religious beliefs on third parties. Refusing to dismiss the claims at the pleading stage, the court said:

Whether religious views provide a defence to or justification for misrepresentations that cause bodily harm or death should only be decided on a full factual record. It is not "plain and obvious" that a sincerely held religious belief would be an answer to a claim where application of the religious doctrine is said to have caused a death. In any event, the pleadings will not require any examination of the "truth" of the respondents’ beliefs about blood transfusions.... The record indicates that the respondents are opposed to transfusions as a matter of faith, not because they are experimental or ineffective.... [O]bjective validity of the belief of the respondents that blood transfusions are prohibited by scripture is not an issue in this litigation ... even though the respondents may raise their sincerely held religious beliefs as a defence or justification.

Yesterday's Calgary Sun in additional background on the case says that the trial court last year had held that the allegations were merely an attack on Jehovah's Witness beliefs.