In Pratt v. Correction Corporation of America, (8th Cir., March 3,2008), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's dismissal of a complaint by an inmate seeking meals that contain Halal meat. The court held that claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are now moot, and that plaintiff failed to show that prison officials placed a "substantial bureden" on his ability to practice his religion.
In Barnes v. Pierce, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17389 (SD TX, March 5, 2008), a Texas federal district court rejected First Amendment, RLUIPA and equal protection challenges to prison rules that limited medium custody inmates to attending one religious service per week. Muslim prisoners complained that they were unable to attend Wednesday Taleem services.
In Hudson v. Dennehy, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16672 (D MA, March 5, 2008), a Massachusetts federal district court issued a declaratory judgment finding that denyining Nation of Islam prisoners regular Halal meals and denying them closed circuit access to religious services while in the prison's Special Management Unit violates their rights under RLUIPA.
In Paulino v. Department of Corrections, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16551 (ED CA, March 4, 2008), a California federal magistrate judge rejected a Rastafarian prisoner's free exercise claim. Prison regulations called for plaintiff's hair to be cut. He agreed so long as the cut hair could be sent home. However subsequently officials refused to send the hair to his home because under prison regulations it was not personal property and posed a potential health hazard.
In Furnace v. Arceo, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16172 (ND CA, March 3, 2008), a California federal district court rejected free exercise and equal protection claims by a follower of the Shetaut Neter faith who sought a raw food diet. The court found the religion merely teaches that practitions may need to transition to such a diet over time. It also found that prison authorities had legitimate penological objectives in denying the diet.
