Interesting legal developments continue to transpire in the case of 462 children taken into custody by the state of Texas after authorities raided the FLDS ranch in Eldorado, Texas earlier this month. (Timeline of events.) Several of them were reported Saturday by Austin's KeyeTV News. In an order issued Friday in a case captioned In re: Sarah Steed, et. al., (TX Ct. App., April 25, 2008), a state appellate court in Austin rejected an emergency motion filed by mothers of the children seeking a stay of an April 22 order issued by the trial court. The mothers were seeking to prevent the children from being placed in facilities throughout the state while their petition for a writ of mandamus is being heard. The appellate court said that, on its face, the trial court's order appears to meet statutory requirements for the placement of the children. A full hearing will be needed to determine if there was an abuse of discretion by the trial court. An expedited hearing on that is scheduled for Tuesday morning.
Meanwhile, Texas Rangers continue to investigate charges that the original call to authorities that led to the raid was not authentic. (See prior posting.) An arrest warrant (full text) has been issued for a Colorado Springs, CO woman, Rozita Swinton, who has a history of making false reports of abuse.
Meanwhile an AP story published Friday says that the breadth of the custody order issued in Texas raises constitutional issues. Jessica Dixon, director of SMU Law School's Child Advocacy Center described the order as an unprecedented "class-action child removal". Of particular concern is whether there was justification for removing the 130 children under five years of age, and the over two-dozen teenage boys, none of whom apparently had been the victims of abuse. Also apparently not all residents of the Ranch practiced polygamy. A Child Protective Services spokesman said that the state has no way to protect the young children from possible future abuse if they remain at the Ranch.
