The essence of the prosecutor's biblical citations ... involved the prosecutor's perception of the jury's role as the "Throne of Judgment" and the judge's role as the "Throne of Mercy." ...[T]he prosecutor cited various Old Testament characters and the judgments allegedly made by God upon their actions. Because this Court cannot conclude that the prosecutor's biblical references impacted the Appellant's substantial rights and seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings, we decline to utilize the plain error doctrine....The court however did reverse appellant's conviction and remand for a new trial on other grounds. Friday's Bluefield (WV) Daily Telegraph discusses the case.
Sunday, May 04, 2008
West Virginia High Court Rejects Challenge To Prosecutor's Biblical References
In State of West Virginia v. Keesecker, (WV Sup. Ct. App., April 25, 2008) West Virginia's Supreme Court of Appeals rejected a claim by a defendant who had been convicted on six counts of sexual assault that her convictions should be reversed because the trial judge permitted the prosecutor to refer to biblical theory and examples during closing argument. Because no objection was made at trial to the comments, the court could reverse only under the "plain error doctrine". The court said:
