An opinion has just become available on LEXIS in an interesting RFRA case decided some nine months ago. In United States v. Adeyemo, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106330 (ND CA, April 8, 2008), a Nigerian adherent of a Santeria-Catholic tradition, who visits the United States regularly to sell handicraft items, was indicted for violating the Endangered Species Act. A customs inspector discovered that Moses Adeyemo was importing Yoruba wall hangings that are made partly of leopard skins. Defendant moved for dismissal of the indictment under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
The court held that it need not conduct the evidentiary hearing that would be required to decide the sincerity of defendant's religious beliefs, or the burden imposed, because dismissal of the indictment would be unavailable in any event. The court found that the "Government has met its burden under RFRA of demonstrating that the current permitting system for leopard skins, which includes no religious exemption, is the least restrictive means of furthering its compelling interest of conserving and protecting the endangered northern African leopard."
