In Potter v. District of Columbia, (DC Cir., March 6, 2009), a case brought under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment barring enforcement of a grooming rule against firefighters who wear beards for religious reasons. (See prior posting.) The D.C. Department of Fire and Emergency Services justified a rule that required personnel who wear face masks to be clean shaven on the ground that this was necessary for effective use of the breathing equipment used in firefighting. The Court of Appeals held that the District of Columbia, however, had already conceded that one type of respirator could safely be worn by bearded firefighters, and that these firefighters could be deployed in fire areas that permitted use of this type of equipment.
Judge Williams concurring complained that: "Unfortunately for the District, its own muddled litigation strategy rendered summary judgment for the plaintiffs a legitimate outcome." He focused on the fact that OSHA regulations-- although they do not apply to the D.C. government-- consider facial hair a problem for all kinds of respirators. The BLT reports on the decision.
