Canadian Tribunal Says Internet Hate Speech Law Is Unconstitutional

In a 107-page opinion handed down yesterday, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) held that Canada's Internet hate speech law is unconstitutional. The CHRT is an adjudicative body that hears discrimination charges referred to it by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. In Warman v. Lemire, (CHRT, Sept. 2, 2009), an opinion by Tribunal member Athanasios Hadjis held that amendments adding monetary penalties to the hate speech law since a 1990 Canadian Supreme Court decision upholding it now make the statute's infringement of free expression disproportionate to the law's objectives. The opinion reasons:

The Supreme Court held in Taylor that despite not requiring any proof of intent to discriminate, s. 13(1) only minimally impairs freedom of expression principally because the Act’s purpose is to prevent discrimination (as well as compensating and protecting the victim), rather than punish moral blameworthiness. ...S. 13(1) has, since the 1998 amendments, lost the exclusively compensatory and preventative features that characterized it in the eyes of the majority in Taylor. Following the Court's reasoning, it can therefore no longer be concluded that the provision still minimally impairs the Charter guaranteed freedom of expression.

Canadian Press reports on the decision. The Ottawa Citizen says that an appeal to the Federal Court of Canada is likely because two other previous Tribunal decisions found the statute constitutional. [Thanks to PewSitter for the lead.]