9th Circuit Denies En Banc Rehearing On Washington State Pharmacy Board Regs

In Stormans Inc. v. Selecky, (9th Cir., Oct. 28, 2009), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to grant an en banc rehearing. In July, a 3-judge panel in the case refused to preliminarily enjoin enforcement of Washington State Pharmacy Board regulations that require pharmacists to fill all prescriptions (including Plan B, the "morning after" contraceptive) even if doing so violates their religious beliefs. (See prior posting.) Along with this week's denial of a rehearing, the original panel granted a request for a rehearing by the panel, and without hearing further arguments vacated its original opinion and issued a new opinion reaching the same conclusion as it did before. However the new opinion, in discussing whether the regulation is neutral and generally applicable, eliminates the section that was in the July opinion taking the district court to task for considering the rule's legislative history . This allowed Judge Clifton to join in the opinion fully and omit the concurrence he filed in July objecting to the majority's conclusion that it was inappropriate to consider the legislative history.