In Canada, the Supreme Court of British Columbia (which is the province's superior trial court) this week ruled that the Crown had proved the elements of criminal negligence in the case of a man who performed a botched ritual circumcision on his 4-year old son. It ruled that the defense can now proceed with its claim that the father is entitled to a constitutional exemption because the circumcision was motivated by defendant's desire to fulfill his religious duty. The opinion in Regina v. D.J.W., (BC Sup. Ct., Oct. 14, 2009), contains rather graphic descriptions of the facts underlying the case.
The exact nature of the accused's religious beliefs is not clear. He is not Jewish, but follows both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. He believed that it was necessary to circumcise his son before Passover. Counsel argued that defendant was entitled to relief in the nature of a constitutional exemption under s. 24(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Wednesday's Vancouver Sun reports on the decision.
