This Sunday, as the Supreme Court's term is about to open, Washington's 56th annual Red Mass will be held at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle. Several justices traditionally attend, along with congressional leaders, diplomats, cabinet secretaries, and sometimes the President. CNN reports that the Red Mass dates back centuries and brings together government leaders involved in the law. Critics, however, say this improperly gives the Catholic Church a special way to lecture the justices.
Barry Lynn, director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, says that Washington's Red Mass was begun after several Supreme Court decisions were handed down that troubled the Church. The Mass is sponsored by the John Carroll Society, a lay Catholic group of legal professionals. Jane Roberts, wife of the chief justice, is an officer of the Society. Currently six of the Justices on the Court are Catholic. Justices of other faiths are invited to the Mass as well, and some, like Justice Breyer (who is Jewish), attend. However Justice Ginsburg, has stopped going because of the subject matter of the sermons. Church officials deny using the Mass to lobby the Court. Last year, 5 Justices attended. (See prior posting.)
Friday, October 02, 2009
Washington's Red Mass Is Sunday As Supreme Court Opens Its Term
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


3 comments:
And this year it will be 6.
-American Atheist
Well do they run the World or what ?
You know there is the freedom of speech in the First Amendment and the:
Freedom of Religion, too !
Declaration:Dignitatis Humanae
So how can one not have faith and just pray for them to make the right choices.
Love can bring the honey and the bees together. So please quit the hate.
Although not the 6 I expected surprisingly.
Dear Mr. OTWOJ, are you accusing me of hate because I detest the Catholic (and all religious) influence on our government including the Supreme Court?
If so, you're probably right. But before you dismiss my hate, ask yourself if maybe it's justified.
I'll take this opportunity to remind you that the words Under God were added to the pledge of allegiance due to the influence of religious leaders and our representatives (I'm talking to you Harry Truman) attending their services. Please see the following link for some background:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance
I know it's hard for a religious person to see anything wrong with this right? But Alonzo Fyfe, the atheist ethicist (you can find him on the web), has written a book called A PERSPECTIVE ON THE PLEDGE available at Lulu.com which shows WHY these words don't belong in the pledge. Not because they're illegal or because it's an establishment of religion but because they are morally repugnant. They lump non-believers in with the people who are against liberty, with rebels, and whatever the opposite of Justice-For-All represents.
Anyway, these sorts of meetings have a very real influence on the direction our country takes and not always a positive one. Consider this year's prayer meeting focused on abortion at a time when a health care bill is working it's way through Congress. Depending on one's point of view, this mass could have a very negative effect.
In short, religion has NO legitimate place in government.
-American Atheist
Post a Comment