In Rust v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services Religion Study Committee, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105793 (D NE, Nov. 12, 2009), a Nebraska federal district court rejected RLUIP and free exercise challenges by inmates who were adherents to the Theodish Belief to authorities' failure to provide them with various food and devotional items and various other claimed restrictions on their religious practice. However the court held that scheduling combined worship time for Theodish Belief and Asatru practitioners did pose a substantial burden on plaintiffs' religious exercise. The court gave defendants additional time to supplement the record regarding the state's alleged compelling interest in this schedule.
In Howard v. Epps, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105366 (SD MS, Oct. 30, 2009), a Mississippi federal magistrate judge permitted a Rastafarian inmate to amend his complaint to allege that the prison's grooming policy violates his First Amendment rights.
In O'Neal v. Brenes, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104852 (CD CA, Nov. 10, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge rejected an inmate's free exercise claim. Plaintiff alleged that he participates in the prison's vegan religious diet program and does not receive enough food. The court dismissed the claim because plaintiff failed to allege that his veganism is rooted in religious belief.
In Griffith v. Bird, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104469 (WD NC, Nov. 3, 2009), a North Carolina federal district court dismissed claims for both damages and an injunction by a Wiccan prisoner who claimed Wiccans were not allowed to have group religious services and that he was denied certain religious items. Corrections Department policy requires an approved volunteer to lead group religious services and vendors of religious items must go through an approval process.
In Haynes v. Sisto, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104532 (ED CA, Oct. 21, 2009), a California federal district court rejected a claim that authorities prevented black inmates from participating in religious activities during lockdowns. Plaintiff did not allege that he was prevented from practicing his religion.
In Flett v. Vail, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99765 (ED WA, Oct. 23, 2009), a Washington federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104255, Aug. 24, 2009), and dismissed claims of a native American inmate that prison officials failed to mail out certain religious items that he had properly processed for mailing. The court allowed plaintiff to move ahead with a RLUIPA challenge to prison regulations that prohibited use of animal fur, claws or bones for religious ceremonies. Plaintiff wished to use an eaglebone whistle.
In Hoffman v. Hennessey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103406 (ND CA, Nov. 6, 2009), a California federal district court held that a Jewish prisoner had stated a cognizable claim under the First Amendment and RLUIPA that he was denied use of a yarmulke and tallit katan. He also was permitted to proceed with a retaliation claim against the Sheriff's Department.
