In Nelson v. Runnels, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82080 (ED CA, Aug. 11, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge recommended denial of defendants' motion for summary judgment, concluding that genuine issues of material fact remain as to an inmate's First Amendment claims that he was denied the right to attend religious services on two occasions in retaliation for his filing administrative grievances. Prison authorities say he did not sign up to attend as required by prison regulations.
In Myers v. Scribner, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81962 (SD CA, Aug. 10, 2010), a California federal district court adopted recommendations of a magistrate (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81961, May 24, 2010) and dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies an inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to organize a Christian-based celebratory feast marking the Last Supper to be attended by 800 inmates.
In Sturdevant v. Holder, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81184 (ND WV, Aug. 10, 2010), a West Virginia federal court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81185, Jan. 10, 2010) and dismissed on the merits a Native American inmate's claim that he was hindered in his religious practice of weekly sweat lodge ceremonies, pipe ceremonies, and yearly pow-wow feasts.
In Taylor v. Halladay, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81060 (ND NY, Aug. 9, 2010), a New York federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81193, July 1,2010)dismissing a prisoner's case. However the magistrate had recommended that plaintiff be permitted to file an amended complaint asserting that his First Amendment rights were violated when because of his administrative confinement in a special housing unit he was unable to attend religious programming.
In Gabriel v. Gusman, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80332 (ED LA, Aug. 10, 2010), a Louisiana federal district court adopted a magistrate' recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80264, July 16, 2010), and dismissed a Baptist inmate's complaint that the prison offered no religious programs or communal services. Plaintiff has a Bible and is permitted to practice his religion on his own.
In Lewis v. Ryan, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80624 (D AZ, July 9, 2010), an Arizona federal district court rejected an inmate's free exercise complaint that he was not allowed to use his retention funds to make a contribution to a charity of his choice. He was allowed to make some donations, and ones of his choice from his spendable account funds.
In Jordan v. Caruso, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80487 (WD MI, Aug. 10, 2010), a Michigan federal district court rejected a Jewish prisoner's challenge to the prison's group worship policy that allowed group worship only if at least five prisoners request it and which denied him participation by teleconference in a service elsewhere. However the court permitted plaintiff to move ahead with his challenge to the requirement he work on the Sabbath and rules that mandate he wait 90 days before requesting a new work schedule even for religious reasons. The magistrate's recommendations in the case are at 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80486, Jan. 28, 2010).
