Court Dismisses Christian Pastors' Challenge To Hate Crimes Law

In Glenn v. Holder, (ED MI, Sept. 7, 2010), a Michigan federal district court dismissed on standing and ripeness grounds a challenge to the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act that had been brought by several Christian pastors. Plaintiffs claim that the law interferes with their right to express opposition to homosexuals and homosexual behavior.  They allege that the Act is vague and overbroad, and will chill individuals from expressing their views that "homosexual orientation is morally wrong."  The court however did not reach the merits of those claims, finding instead that plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate that they faced a credible threat of prosecution under the Act.  No case or controversy exists because plaintiffs failed to allege that they intend to willfully cause bodily injury to anyone. The court also concluded that plaintiffs' claims are not ripe. They merely present hypothetical situations that plaintiffs believe will be investigated or prosecuted. Bay City (MI) Times reports on the decision.