Here, the lower court found that Fiji Jamaat’s evidence established a deliberative process that was religious in nature. Specifically, the court found that the decision to expel appellants was based on a consideration of whether appellants’ conduct was improper, unbecoming, or likely to endanger the interest of Fiji Jamaat based upon the religious beliefs of the organization. This presents an ecclesiastical question, and the court correctly refused to consider appellants’ contentions pertaining to the reasons for expulsion in greater depth. The trial court stated that Fiji Jamaat abided by the terms of the bylaws for termination of membership, provided adequate notice of the charges brought against appellants, and afforded them an opportunity to be heard.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Friday, November 26, 2010
Court Rejects Challenges By Members To Their Expulsion From Religious Organization
In Khan v. Fiji Jamaat-Ul Islam of America, (CA Ct. App., Nov. 23, 2010), a California appellate court rejected a challenge by two individuals to their expulsion from membership in a religious organization by the organization's board. The court said: