Court Rejects Free Exercise Defense To Khat Possession Conviction

In State of Minnesota v. Ahmed, (MN Ct. App., Nov. 23, 2010), a Minnesota appellate court upheld defendants' convictions for possession of khat.  Finding that khat is a controlled substance, the court rejected defendants' free exercise defense.  It held that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2006 O'Centro decision is distinguishable.  It involved an interpretation of the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and that statute is inapplicable to the states. Yesterday's Minneapolis Star Tribune reports on the decision.