The
New York Times carries an article, appearing on the front page of its print edition today, that is highly critical of the architectural design of the many new projects being built in Saudi Arabia in the center of the holy city of Mecca. Here is a sampling of the criticism:
It is an architectural absurdity. Just south of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, the Muslim world’s holiest site, a kitsch rendition of London's Big Ben is nearing completion.... [I]t will be ... the centerpiece of a complex that is housing a gargantuan shopping mall, an 800-room hotel and a prayer hall for several thousand people. Its muscular form, an unabashed knockoff of the original, blown up to a grotesque scale, will be decorated with Arabic inscriptions and topped by a crescent-shape spire in what feels like a cynical nod to Islam’s architectural past. To make room for it, the Saudi government bulldozed an 18th-century Ottoman fortress and the hill it stood on....
The city’s makeover ... reflects a split between those who champion turbocharged capitalism and those who think it should stop at the gates of Mecca, which they see as the embodiment of an Islamic ideal of egalitarianism.
The Saudi government says the new construction is needed to accommodate the growing number of Muslims who make the pilgrimage to Mecca.
