6th Circuit: Judge's 10 Commandments Poster Violates Establishment Clause

In ACLU of Ohio Foundation, Inc. v. DeWeese, (6th Cir., Feb. 2, 2011), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals held that a Ten Commandments display posted in a courtroom by a state common pleas court judge violates the Establishment Clause.  At issue were two posters hung by Judge James DeWeese-- one setting out the Bill of Rights and the other which compares the "Moral Absolutes" of the Ten Commandments with ten parallel principles of "Moral Relatives: Humanist Principles." Finding first that plaintiff has standing, the court held that any purported secular purpose put forward by defendant was a sham. The court, analyzing the poster's contents, also concluded that the poster:

sets forth overt religious messages and religious endorsements. It is a display of the Ten Commandments editorialized by Defendant, a judge in an Ohio state court, exhorting a return to "moral absolutes" which Defendant himself defines as the principles of the "God of the Bible." The poster is an explicit endorsement of religion by Defendant in contravention of the Establishment Clause.

Finally the court concluded that Judge DeWeese had no free expression defense since the posters are government speech, not private judicial speech. The Christian Post reports on the decision.