Scottish Court Limits Conscientious Objections Of Midwives

A Scottish court has rejected the claim by two midwives employed at Glasgow's Southern General Hospital that because of their conscientious objection they should not be required to delegate to, supervise or support staff on the labor ward who are directly involved with patients undergoing termination of pregnancy. In In re Petition of Doogan, (CSOH, Feb. 29, 2012), the Court of Session (Outer House) held that the conscientious objection provisions of the Abortion Act 1967 only excuse medical personnel from participating in the treatment of a patient, not from activities further removed than that.The court also rejected petitioners' claim that the Human Rights Act 1998 protects them. The court held: "Here, the petitioners are being protected from having any direct involvement with the procedure to which they object. Nothing they have to do as part of their duties terminates a woman's pregnancy. They are sufficiently removed from direct involvement as, it seems to me, to afford appropriate respect for and accommodation of their beliefs." Today's Scotsman reports on the decision.