Monday, December 17, 2012

Moorish Science Adherent Arrested After Claiming Change of Identity

Yesterday's Tampa Bay Times reports on the jailing in late November in Pasco County Florida of Shanita Marie Burden on charges of driving with a counterfeit car tag, driving without a Florida license (her South Carolina license was suspended), and giving a false name to police. Burden insists she is Zuri Akila Betiti Matawala Zurj-Bey, a "grand sheikess" in the Moorish Temple of Science of the World. She insists that black people are not subject to the United States government, but instead are Moorish. In September, she was stopped when she was found driving a car with license tags reading : "Moorish American Republic 070117-004." She claimed that a piece of paper with a fuzzy photo from the Moorish Divine National Movement of the World issued to a Zuri Akila Betiti Matawala Zurj-Bey was her drivers' license. The woman claims she was born of a religious conversion last year and that she declared her former self, Shanita Burden, dead. She then made herself the personal representative for Burden's estate and filed court papers declaring this. At a Nov. 19 arraignment on the traffic charges, Bey, identified herself only as "flesh and blood."  She told Circuit Judge Susan Gardner that she was appearing as the personal representative of Burden, but the court ruled that since she wan not an attorney, she could not do so.  The court then issued a warrant against Burden for failing to appear in court. She was arrested eight days later when she attempted to file papers in the clerk of court's office ordering Judge Susan Gardner not to issue any more unlawful warrants against Burden.


Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

No one can articulate what we as Moorish Americans are or what they do. Nor make disrespectful and derogatory remarks about our Prophet Noble Drew Ali our Religion or our officials. These irresponsible acts of misinformation to law enforcement are causing unnecessary conflicts that are initiated by law enforcement who believe we are acting radical or as some of the Sovereign Citizens who we have nothing to do with. It is hoped that this blog will enlighten and educate those who truly want to know what we stand for instead of attempting to trample on our religious beliefs and practices.
I reiterate, Congress shall pass no law with respect to the establishment of religion or the practice thereof. We are the Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World, Free and Sundry Moorish Science Temple of America. We are a Theocratic Governmental Society and Religious Corporation.
For those who do not know a Theocracy is a government whose laws come from the Deity of that Society and an earthly representative. A religious corporation is a type of non-profit organization that is recognized on a subnational level. It is responsible for the organization for the organization of its own local government, acknowledged as a nation entirely within a nation.
The Moorish Divine and National Movement of the World which includes The Old Canaanite Temple, The Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World and The Moorish Science Temple of America. We have been in existence for 100 years since 1913 founded by Prophet Noble Drew Ali.
Our religious beliefs and practices teach us in our Book of Laws and Moral Teachings, Divine Constitution and By-laws and doctrine that;
The Holy Koran Circle Seven
1. Ch. 48:6 we as a clean and pure nation do not desire to amalgamate, meaning we are required not to mix or intertwine with other organizations or governments.
2. Ch 48:7 we are returning the church and Christianity back to the European for it was made for his earthly salvation. This means that the only people in history that are known as Christians are Europeans, we are not Europeans therefore, we cannot be a part of it’s church or society.
3. Ch 47:9. According to all true and divine records of the human race there is no negro, black, or colored race attached to the human family, because all the inhabitants of Africa were and are of the human race, descendants of the ancient Canaanite nation from the holy land of Canaan.
4. 47:10. What your ancient forefathers were, you are today without doubt or contradiction.
5. 47:11. There is no one who is able to change man from the descendant nature of his forefathers; unless his power extends beyond the great universal Creator Allah Himself.
6. 47:12. These holy and divine laws are from the Prophet, Noble Drew Ali, the founder of the uniting of the Moorish Science Temple of America.
7. 47:13. These laws are to be strictly preserved by the members of all the Temples, of the Moorish Science Temple of America. That they will learn to open their meeting and guide it according to the principles of Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom and Justice.
8. 47:14. Every subordinate Temple of the Grand-Major Temple is to form under the covenant of Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom and Justice; and to create their own laws and customs, in conjunction with the laws of the Holy Prophet and the Grand Temple. I, the Prophet, Noble Drew Ali, was sent by the great God, Allah, to warn all Asiatics of America to repent from their sinful ways; before that great and awful day that is sure to come.
9. 47:15. The time has come when every nation must worship under its own vine and fig tree, and every tongue must confess his own.
10. 47:16. Through sin and disobedience every nation has suffered slavery, due to the fact that they honored not the creed and principles of their forefathers.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

Our Divine Constitution and By-Laws require us to obey these laws;
Act 1- The Grand Sheik and the chairman of the Moorish Holy Temple of Science is in power to make law and enforce laws with the assistance of the Prophet and the Grand Body of the Moorish Holy Temple of Science. The assistant Grand Sheik is to assist the Grand Sheik in all affairs if he lives according to Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom, and Justice and it is known before the members of the Moorish Holy Temple of Science.
Act 4.—All members must preserve these Holy and Divine laws, and all members must obey the laws of the government, because by being a Moorish American, you are a part and parcel of the government, and must live the life accordingly.
Act 5.—This organization of the Moorish Science Temple of America is not to cause any confusion or to overthrow the laws and constitution of the said government but to obey hereby.
Act 6.—With us all members must proclaim their nationality and we are teaching our people their nationality and their divine creed that they may know that they are a part and a partial of this said government, and know that they are not Negroes, Colored Folks, Black People, or Ethiopians, because these names were given to slaves by slave holders in 1779 and lasted until 1865 during the time of slavery, but this is a new era of time now, and all men now must proclaim their free national name to be recognized by the government in which they live and the nations of the earth, this is the reason why Allah the great God of the universe ordained Noble Drew Ali, the Prophet to redeem his people from their sinful ways. The Moorish Americans are the descendants of the ancient Moabites who inhabited the North Western and South Western shores of Africa (we are taught to believe is right here in the United States for America).

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

Our Doctrine
A Divine Warning By The Prophet For The Nations
From The Prophet (Drew Ali)
The citizens of all free national governments according to their national constitution are all of one family bearing one free national name. Those who fail to recognize the free national name of their constitutional government are classes as undesirables, and are subject to all inferior names and abuses and mistreatments that the citizens car to bestow upon them. And it is a sin for any group of people to violate the national constitutional laws of a free national government and cling to the names and the principles that delude to slavery.
Paragraph 5 sentence (3)(4)(5)
(3) In all other governments when a man is born and raised there and asked for his national descent name and if he fails to give it, he is misused, imprisoned, or exiled. (4) Any group of people that fail to answer up to the constitutional standards of law by name and principles, because to be a citizen of any government you must claim your national descent name. (5) Because they place their trust upon issue and names formed by their forefathers.
(1) The word Negro deludes in the Latin language to the word nigger; the same as the word “colored” deludes to anything that is painted, varnished and dyed. (2) And every nation must bear a national descent name of their forefathers, because honoring thy fathers and they mothers, your days will be lengthened upon this earth. (3) These names have never been recognized by any true American citizen of this day. (4) Through your free national name you are known and recognized by all nations of the earth that are recognized by said national government in which they live. (5) The 14th and 15th Amendments brought the North and South in unit, placing the Southerners who were at that time without power, with the constitutional body of power. (6) And at that time, 1865, the free national constitutional law that was enforced since 1774 declared all men equal and free, and if all men are declared by the free national constitution to be free and equal since that constitution has never been changed, there is no need for the application of the 14th and 15th Amendments for the salvation of our people and citizens.

So as you can see, we can’t be black, negro colored, African American etc. These are not nationalities they are for the most part adjectives and colors, neither allude to one’s national origin. We Moorish American have always been here and there are several states that have legislature that gives instruction as to how our two societies (Moorish and Christian) co-exist.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

So to call Zuri Akila Bititi Matawala Zurj Bey Shanita Burden is not only a burden of her religious beliefs and practices but also genocide and denationalization. As you can see, her religion requires her to proclaim her free national descent name therefore by religious conversion, she changed her name. This is also well substantiated in supreme court and federal case law

“Under common law, any adult or emancipated person has the right to change his or her name without legal formality or permission of the court to any name he or she lawfully chooses.”

N.J.- Egner v. Egner, 133 N.J. Super. 403, 337 A 2d 46
Conn.- Custer v. Bonadies, 30 Conn. Supp. 385, 318 A.2d 639
Wash.- Doe v. Dunning, 87 Wash. 2d 50, 549 P.2d 1
Ariz.- Laks v. Laks, 25 Ariz. App. 58, 540 P.2d 1277
N.Y.- Application of Douglas, 60 Misc. 2d 1057, 304, N.Y.S. 2d 558
Mass.- In re Verrill, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 34, 660 N.E.2d 697(1996)
N.J.- Application of Ferner, 295 N.J. Super. 409, 685 A2d 78 (Law Div 1996)

“The common law and statutory right to change one’s name belongs to the individual whose name is being changed and in the absence of statutory restriction, a person may lawfully change his or her name without resort to any legal proceedings, at nay time as long as it does not interfere with the rights of others and it is not done for a fraudulent purpose, but with an honest purpose.”

Mo.- Barr v. Barr 987 S.W.2d 471 (Mo. Ct. App. S.D. 1999)
U.S. –Jech v. Burch, 466 f. Supp,. 714 (D. Haw. 1979)
Ark. – Clinton v. Morrow, 220 Ark. 377,247 S.W.2d 1015
Cal. – Weingand v. Lorre, 231 Cal. App. 2d 289, 41 Cal. Rptr. 778
Conn.- Don v. Don, 142 Conn. 309, 114 A.2d 203
Miss.- Marshal v. Marshal, 230 Miss, 719,93 So. 2d 822
N.Y.- Haynes v. Brennan, 16 Misc. 2d 13, 135 N.y. S.2d 900
Cal.- In re Marriage of Banks, 42 Cal. App. 3d 631,117 Cal Rptr.37
Ill.-Thomas v. Thomas, 100 Ill. App. 3d 1080, 56 Ill. Dec. 604, 427 N.E. 2d 1009
Ill- Chaney v. Civil Service Commission, 82 Ill. 2d 289, 45 Ill. Dec 146, 412 N.E.2d 497
N.Y.- Application of Halligan, 46 A.D.2d 170, 361 N.Y.S.2d 458
Ohio.- Dennis v. Ford Motor Co. 121 Ohio App.
Va.- In re Miller, 218 Va. 939, 243 S.E.2d 464
U.S.- U.S. v. Wasmaa, 484 F. Supp. 54 5 Fed R. Evid. Serv. 590
Ind. – Petition of Hauptly, 262 Ind. 150, 312 N.E.2d 857
Mich.- Piotrowski v. Piotrowski, 71 Mich. App. 213, 247 N.W.2d 354
Mass.- In re Verrill, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 34. 660 N.E. 697

“Under the common law, a change of name is accomplished by usage or habit. The name thus assumed will constitute the person’s legal name for all purposes just as much as though he or she had borne it from birth or as though it had been provided for by a court order, even though the name taken is the name of another living person.”
Md.- Klein v. Klein, 36 Md. App. 177, 373 A.2d86
N.Y.- Application of Halligan, 46 A.D.2d 170, 361 N.Y.S.2d 458
U.S. – In re Leibowitz, 49 F Supp. 953
Cal.- In re Useldinger, 35 Cal. App. 2d 723, 96P.2d 958
N.Y.- Matter of Lipschutz, 178 Misc. 113, 32 N.Y.S.2d 264

So do you really think Zuri gave the Deputy a false name???

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

Most people who consider themselves Black and/or Christians are our main adversaries. They love the name given to them by their parents and take offense at the thought of changing it. Although we adhere to the Prophet Jesus whom we call Justice, they still fabricate what or who we are, just as the media. We do not recruit or attempt to persuade others to join our faith. Most people come to us by recommendation or word of mouth. Therefore the state jurisdiction has nothing to worry about, we are Moorish Americans because we are taught to believe we are descendant of Moroccans and born he in America. There are our religious beliefs and practices so what does state legislature and case laws say about our existence.
We established a Religious Corporation in South Carolina on January 17, 2007, South Carolina Secretary of the State file# 070117-0268 and on June 3rd 2011 we established the Ministry of Land Transport and Navigations for the purpose of regulating and organizing our Temple’s property in the form of automobiles for religious missionary, education, charitable and private use.
Since we established our religious corporation in South Carolina, we included in our Title the term Free and Sundry as in The Free and Sundry Moors Act of 1789-1790 which stated that if a Moor is accused of a crime they be tried as a Free White Person and not as a Negro under the Negro Act. It also was decided by the committee assigned to investigate the Free Moors that the laws of the State of South Carolina do not apply to the Free Moors.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

South Carolina Codes of Law 33-31-180 the 1985 – 2005 version reads;
“All Directors, Trustees, or members of the Not for Profit Corporation described in subsection B are immune from suit arising from the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation. This immunity from suit is removed when the conduct amounts to willful, wanton or gross negligence.”

Note: I am Director and my Grandsheikess/Missionary Zuri Akila Bititi Matawala Zurj Bey is one of our trustees, so please tell me where there was any gross wanton negligence?

While the 2007 version included more attention to the doctrine and constitutionality;
“If religious doctrine governing the affairs of a religious corporation is inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter on the same subject, the religious doctrine controls to the extent required by the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of South Carolina or Both.”
Which means our status is evaluated on a constitutional level and not color of law or statutes.
South Carolina provides a history on religious corporation in south Carolina
“As a result of history, policy, and constitutional principles, religious corporations are entitled to protections not available to business or other nonprofit corporations. Courts have been reluctant to interfere with the internal affairs of religious organizations. They will not decide between confliction religious doctrine or determine the “true” faith. However, courts have often decided internal property disputes by applying neutral principles of contract or corporate law to organizational documents or religious organizations. See Mansfield, “The Religious Clauses of the First Amendment and the Philosophy of the Constitution,”72 Calif. L. Rev. 847 (1984); Ellman, “Driven from the Tribunal: Judicial Resolution of Internal Church Disputes, “69 Calif. L. Rev. 1878 (1981).

This reluctance is based in part on the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which provides: “Congress shall make no law respecting and establishment of religion, or prohibiting the exercise thereof..: The establishment clause applies to states [Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947)], as does the free exercise clause [Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 1 (1940)].

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

The original Religious Corporation was establish July 20, 1928, in accords with Illinois Revised Statutes section 805 section 110/10 ch. 32 to 36.
South Carolina Codes 33-31-302 demonstrates the general powers of a corporation, regardless of what type;
Title 33 - Corporations, Partnerships and Associations
SECTION 33-31-302-305 and 401. General powers.
Unless its articles of incorporation provide otherwise, every corporation has perpetual duration and succession in its corporate name and has the same powers as an individual to do all things necessary or convenient to carry out its affairs including, without limitation, power:
(1) to sue and be sued, complain, and defend in its corporate name;
(2) to have a corporate seal, which may be altered at will, and to use it, or a facsimile of it, by impressing or affixing or in any other manner reproducing it;
(3) to make and amend bylaws not inconsistent with its articles of incorporation or with the laws of this State for regulating and managing the affairs of the corporation;
(4) to purchase, receive, lease, or otherwise acquire, and own, hold, improve, use, and otherwise deal with, real or personal property or any legal or equitable interest in property, wherever located;
(10) to conduct its activities, locate offices, and exercise the powers granted by this chapter within or without this State;
(11) to elect or appoint directors, officers, employees, and agents of the corporation, define their duties, and fix their compensation;
(18) to do all things necessary or convenient, not inconsistent with law, to further the activities and affairs of the corporation.
Again please tell me what we have done wrong.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

The right to travel is an unalienable right (meaning given to you by God) it is void only if you intend or you are using your transportation for the purpose of commerce or for hire. If you are not operating a motor vehicle or vehicle which is a mode of transportation used for commerce only (18USC31), you have the right to use your automobile or household appliances to transport you and your family in a manner that allows you to take care of your everyday chores, business and private family recreation.
The Department of Motor Vehicle is a private for profit corporation who has authority over those who have knowingly, willingly and intentionally entered into a contract with said corporation. Therefore, although there is no law making it mandatory to get a license unless you’re in commerce, however, it is the contract that makes the law and not any type of legislative mandate. Erie Railroad Co. v Thompkins states that where no contract exists, there is no case!!!
Here’s some more case law on the right to travel.
"The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.
"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.
"The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.
"The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice." Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.
"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489.
There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights." Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946
"The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of." Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907).
"A soldier's personal automobile is part of his ``household goods[.]'' U.S. v Bomar,
A Private automobile is not required by any law, code or statute to be recorded.
Traveling in an automobile on the public roads was not a threat to the public safety or health
and constituted no hazard to the public, and such a traveler owed nothing more than “due
care” (as regards to tort for negligence) to the public and the owner owed no other duty to the
public (eg. State), he / she and his / her auto, having equal rights to and on the roadways / highways as horses and wagons, etc.; this same right is still substantive rule, in that speeding, running stop signs, traveling without license plates, or registration are not threats to the public safety, and thus, are not arrestable offenses. Christy v. Elliot, 216 I 131, 74 HE 1035, LRA NS 1905 – 1910: California v.Farley 98 CED Rpt. 89, 20 CA 3d 1032 (1971).

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

Zuri Matawala Zurj Bey was on her way home from a job passing through Pasco County she was not speeding, swerving in the road or endangering the public safety. She was not operating in traffic meaning transporting commercial goods and services on the public roads. Nor was she driving because that means she is transporting passenger for hire..
We are not terrorist nor are we Sovereign Citizens. We are Citizens of an autonomous Theocratic Government. Similar to the Quakers, Mormons, Amish, the Hassidic Jews or the Vatican.
As far as the courts are concerned
U.S. v. Ballard (1944)
The Court found that neither the courts nor the government have the right to evaluate the religious beliefs of a citizen or group.
In closing,
As you can see by the laws of the society at large that we have done nothing that is against the law. We have our own laws that we must obey and the 1st Amendment and case laws has stated that the federal government has no jurisdiction to make laws with respect to our religion or the practice thereof.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

So back to your article:
• Yesterday's Tampa Bay Times reports on the jailing in late November in Pasco County Florida of Shanita Marie Burden on charges of driving with a counterfeit car tag, driving without a Florida license.
• Rebuttal: As demonstrated above, SHANITA BURDEN has been replaced by Zuri Zurj Bey via religious conversion. The driver’s license associated with SHANITA BURDEN has been rescinded and revoke therefore she has no contracts with the motor vehicle department. The allegations of a counterfeit tag has been dropped and that was allegedly the probable cause for the stop, correct?
• giving a false name to police. Burden insists she is Zuri Akila Betiti Matawala Zurj-Bey, a "grand sheikess" in the Moorish Temple of Science of the World.
• Rebuttal: As demonstrated above, She did not give a false name to police, she is a Grand Sheikess of the Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World, established in 1916.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

• She insists that black people are not subject to the United States government, but instead are Moorish.
• Rebuttal: This is a lie!! She said no such thing. Black people who are 14th Amendment citizens are subject to the Federal jurisdiction of Washington DC which is the United States Government.
• In September, she was stopped when she was found driving a car with license tags reading : "Moorish American Republic 070117-004.
• Rebuttal: As mentioned earlier that frivolous accusation was dropped.
• She claimed that a piece of paper with a fuzzy photo from the Moorish Divine National Movement of the World issued to a Zuri Akila Betiti Matawala Zurj-Bey was her drivers' license.
• Rebuttal: This is another lie because as it has been demonstrated we do not need driver’s license because we do not operate in commerce. This is not our law, it is the law of the land.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

• She then made herself the personal representative for Burden's estate and filed court papers declaring this. At a Nov. 19 arraignment on the traffic charges, Bey, identified herself only as "flesh and blood." She told Circuit Judge Susan Gardner that she was appearing as the personal representative of Burden, but the court ruled that since she wan not an attorney, she could not do so.
• Rebuttal: Those who understand corporate law which is what is used in the state court system, understands that anyone can represent themselves. Having an attorney means that you cannot handle your own affairs or speak for yourself. In the state court there are only two types of law, that is trust law and contract law. The so called judges act as administrators over the corporate 14th Amendment citizens estate trust. The only one with the true authority over that trust is the grantor of that trust. It was substantiated when your footprint touched that birth certificate and your mother co-signed it. As long as you abandon it, the courts administrate over it unbeknownst to the people. She identified herself as the occupant of the Executrix officer to the SHANITA MARIE BURDEN Estate trust making her the highest authority in the court. The courts are corporations and a corporation can do nothing to a flesh and blood entity therefore they have to trick the people into verbal contracts making them identify themselves as corporations or taking responsibility for the corporation in all capital letters on the piece of paper.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

• “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creation and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other that corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administraters 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54.
• The court then issued a warrant against Burden for failing to appear in court. She was arrested eight days later when she attempted to file papers in the clerk of court's office ordering Judge Susan Gardner not to issue any more unlawful warrants against Burden.
• Rebuttal: The courts issued the frivolous warrant after the notice to vacate was submitted. This is because her real name is Zuri Akila Bititi Matawala Zurj Bey a Moorish American official Missionary home based out South Carolina Republic. She is not a resident of Florida but a Citizen and trustee of a Theocratic Governmental Society and a Religious Corporation and not SHANITA MARIE BURDEN a 14th Amendment corporation.

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

This was lengthy but necessary. The slanders, defamations, denationalization and genocide must stop. We are not terrorists, we are not violent, we have nothing against any law enforcement we just wish to be left alone. For the last 100 years our status has been constitutional. I have demonstrated what the Organic Constitution as well as our Divine Constitution says. Therefore, it would not be wise to try and misconstrue what has been explained in this blog. I am attempting to educate, take it for what it is and not what you want it to mean. We are watching because we will not be persecuted or burdened for our religious beliefs and practices.
Jelani Diliza Abdullah Khalfani Bey
National Grand Sheik/Director
Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World
Free and Sundry
Moorish Science Temple of America
Ministry of Land Transport and Navigation

blksista said...

This was extremely informational and I appreciate how you broke all these things down. I will pass this along to as many people that will read it because I believe it as truth. You only have to read and do a little research to know that we as people aren't corporations and the courts can only deal with such as them. I understood this but not as clearly as I do now. Thank you so much


Islam Brother Jelani Khalfani Bey!!! Thank you for uplifting fallen humanity!!!

Jelani Khalfani Bey said...

Gratitude to those who took the time to read. We are still getting problems from these false accusations. Simply because ones will not do their research. The separation of Church and State protects Societies like ours, At least supposed to. Again thank you for spreading this information. Peace Love and Honor,

Unknown said...

Very informative, Thank you.