Defendants reasonably accommodated Plaintiff’s religious beliefs by offering to let him go off-site daily for his noon prayers. Accordingly, Defendants were not required to consider other proposals and need not show that Plaintiff’s alternative proposals would result in undue hardship.... But assuming, arguendo, the need to do so, the Court finds undue hardship is an independent reason to grant Defendants summary judgment.The court also concluded that plaintiff had not been constructively discharged.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Employer Offered Reasonable Accommodation To Muslim Employee For Noontime Prayer
In Farah v. A-1 Careers, (D KA, Nov. 20, 2013), a Kansas federal district court dismissed a claim by a Muslim former employee of a temporary staffing agency that the agency unreasonably failed to accommodate his need to pray at noontime. The court held: