the court is not insensitive to the Does and Doechild's claim that they feel marginalized by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the text of the Pledge. Subjective feelings, however, do not and cannot serve as a constitutional litmus test for equal protection in the absence of some invidious classification because potentially anything offensive to one's subjective sensibilities could be struck down as unconstitutional.The Becket Fund issued a press release announcing the court's decision.
UPDATE: Here is a link to the full opinion and court's order.