the NYSED’s New Guidelines would effectively frustrate the Petitioners’ constitutionally protected right to the free exercise of religion through a series of onerous requirements; would effectively frustrate the Petitioners’ constitutionally protected free speech rights by dictating what can and cannot be taught in yeshivas; would effectively frustrate the Petitioners’ constitutionally protected due process right to control the upbringing and the education of their children, as recognized by Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925), and Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923); and would hamper and inhibit the educational system that is central to Petitioners’ way of life, raising issues similar, and relevantly indistinguishable, to those addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).The suit challenges the Guidelines on other state law grounds as well. Yeshiva World reports on the lawsuit.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Friday, March 08, 2019
Yeshivas Sue In Challenge To New York's "Substantial Equivalency" Guidelines
Yesterday, a group of yeshivas, parents and other Orthodox Jewish organizations filed a state-court lawsuit challenging the New York State Education Department's recently adopted Substantial Equivalency Review and Determination Process. The new regulations are aimed at assuring that yeshivas, as well as other non-public religious and independent schools, comply with state law requiring them to offer an education substantially equivalent to that of public schools. (See prior posting.) The 50-page complaint (full text) in Parents for Educational and Religious Liberty In Schools, (Sup. Ct. Albany Cty. NY, filed 3/7/2019), alleges in part: