Episcopal Diocese Sues 11 Breakaway Churches

The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia has taken the next legal step in the property disputes between the Diocese and eleven local churches in which a majority of members have voted to leave the Episcopal Church. (See prior postings 1, 2.) Eight of those local congregations have already filed lawsuits seeking to transfer their property to the Church of Nigeria through the Convocation of Anglicans in North America. The Living Church Foundation reported yesterday that in each of the eleven suits, the Diocese is seeking a declaration "that there has been an improper trespass, conversion, alienation and use of the real and personal property”; an order upholding "the trust, proprietary and contract rights of the diocese"; an order restraining further use and occupancy of the property by the local congregations; an order transferring legal title to and control of the property to the Diocese; and an order requiring an accounting by local congregations of their "use of all real and personal property".

IRS Posts Online Training Course For Tax-Exempt Organizations

In mid-January, the Internal Revenue Service posted on its website a new web-based version of its Exempt Organizations Workshop on tax compliance issues confronted by small and mid-sized tax exempt organizations, including churches and other religious groups. The Stay Exempt web course covers keeping tax-exempt status, taxation of unrelated business income, employment issues, completing Form 990 and record disclosures.

Namibian Church Sues Government Paper For Defamation

In Namibia, the fast-growing Universal Church of the Kingdom of God filed a defamation suit seeking damages from the government-owned newspaper that ran an article characterizing the church as a "Satanic sect". Today's Namibian reports that the High Court suit against the Southern Times (jointly owned by the Namibian and Zimbabwean governments) focuses on a December 2005 headline that read "State bans 'Satanic' sect' " and which was published above a photograph showing the church's building in Windhoek. In fact the ban was in Zambia, and came after a riot stemming from rumors about the church.

Proposal For Court-Stripping Amendment To Arizona Constitution

Arizona State Senator Karen Johnson yesterday introduced a proposed state constitutional amendment (SCR 1026) that would strip all state courts in Arizona of jurisdiction over

any matter to the extent that relief is sought against the federal, the state or a local government or against an officer or agent [of such governments], whether or not ... acting in his official or personal capacity, concerning the government's of the officer's or the agent's acknowledgement of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty or government.

Today's Arizona Daily Star says that Sen. Johnson has introduced the amendment in reaction to decisions in other states finding problems with "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance and with 10 Commandments displays on public property. Johnson explained her concerns:

In the (federal) Constitution, what it means is that there is to be no state religion. But we're supposed to have religion in everything — the opportunity to have religion in everything. I want religion in government, I want my government to have a faith-based perspective. The courts do their own thing. They're making up law out of how they feel about things. They're not following the Constitution.

The proposed amendment would not affect federal court jurisdiction over suits challenging governmental support of religion.

Israeli Court Convicts Muslim Husband For Unilateral Divorce

In Israel, a Magistrate's Court in Nazareth has convicted a Muslim man of ending his marriage without his wife's agreement and against her will. Yesterday's Haaretz reports that the husband began proceedings in a religious court, but became angry at accusations made by his wife and called for a divorce. Magistrate Court Judge Taufik Katili in his ruling wrote that "defendant's act was arbitrary, carried out during ongoing court discussions while ignoring court procedures. By so doing the defendant objectified and demonized the complainant while disregarding her autonomous will and right to joint determination over the fate of their relationship." The Magistrate's Court sentenced the man to five months of community service and a fine of NIS 30,000.

UPDATE: From Emory's Islamic Family Law site: "Israel's Women's Equal Rights Law 1951 provides penal sanction of imprisonment for husband's unilateral decision to divorce against wife's will and in absence of court judgement permitting such repudiation, but repudiation remains valid."

Rape Victim Denied Morning After Pill By Jail Worker With Religious Objections

The Associated Press yesterday reported on a case in Tampa, Florida in which a rape victim, after being taken to a rape crisis center where she was given the first dose of the morning-after pill, failed to get the needed second dose on time because of religious objections of a Tampa jail worker. While police were investigating the rape of the 21-year old college student, they discovered that she still owed a $4585 fine under an outstanding juvenile warrant from 2003. So they stopped their investigation and arrested the victim. That is where a jail worker refused to give the victim her next dose of medication on religious grounds. The victim ended up taking the second pill a day late after she was released from jail.

Trial Held On Kindergartener's Jesus Poster

On Monday, a New York federal district court heard witnesses in Baldwinsville Central School District v. Peck, on remand from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. (See prior posting). The suit was filed after suburban Syracuse school officials folded a kindergarten student's environmental poster in half to hide a robed figure representing Jesus before displaying the poster at a school assembly. The Second Circuit sent the case back to the trial court to determine whether the school district had engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, and whether the school had a compelling interest to take the action it did. Mathew Staver, lawyer for the student's mother said "We think we have shown that a secular picture would not have been covered up and this was censored only because of its religious nature. And that is unlikely that anyone would have misconstrued the full display of Antonio's picture as the school district supporting the establishment of a religion." The Associated Press yesterday reported on the trial.

Italian Judge Is No-Show At Hearing On Requirement For Cross In His Courtroom

In Italy, Judge Luigi Tosti failed to show up at a hearing Tuesday on whether he has violated the law by refusing to hear cases in his courtroom so long as a crucifix remains on display in it. Apparently this is the appeal of an October 2005 conviction. (See prior posting). UPI reports that Tosti, who is Jewish, says that courtrooms in Italy should be religiously neutral. While Italy's constitution requires separation of church and state, local authorities have been given the right to display crucifixes, crosses and other religious symbols in schools, courtrooms and other public buildings. Italy's Justice Department says that the Rocco Code, adopted during the Mussolini era, which requires the cross to be placed in Tosti's courtroom, still governs on this issue. (See prior posting.)

Preliminary Injunction Denied On Missouri Anti-Funeral Picketing Law

In Phelps-Roper v. Nixon, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5783 (WD MO, Jan. 27, 2007), a Missouri federal district court refused to grant a preliminary injunction to prevent Missouri authorities from enforcing the state's anti-funeral picketing law against members of the Westboro Baptist Church who wish to picket funerals of soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Their signs generally say that God is punishing America for the sin of homosexuality by killing Americans, including soldiers. (See prior posting.) The court found that plaintiff had not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of her claim that the statute is a content-based restriction on speech and that is overbroad and vague. The court also refused to issue a proposed consent judgment filed by one of the defendants, Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Missouri, that would have permanently enjoined enforcement of the statute. Other defendants in the case objected to the consent judgment.

Russian Prelate Criticizes Teaching Of Evolution

MosNews reports today that Patriarch Alexy II, head of the Russian Orthodox Church, has said that it is unacceptable to impose Darwin's theory of evolution on students in Russian schools. At an educational conference in Moscow, he said: "Teaching the biblical theory of the world’s creation will not harm students. If people choose to believe that they descended from apes, let them, but without imposing their opinions on others."

Indiana Senate Moves Back To Opening Prayers

According to yesterday's Ft. Wayne News-Sentinel, for the first time since 2005, Indiana's Senate opened its session with an oral prayer rather than a moment of silence. The Senate had moved to a moment of silence after a federal district judge said that sectarian prayers used to open sessions of the Indiana House of Representatives were unconstitutional. (See prior posting.) However the Senate's new President Pro Tem, David Long, said members felt it was important to go back to an oral prayer, even if they cannot mention the word Jesus. The Senate prayers will be given by one of six senators at first, Long said. He hopes more Senators will participate later, though some of them feel uncomfortable following judicial guidelines in praying.

Canadian Town Decrees "Norms" For New Immigrants

In Canada, the small village of Herouxville, Quebec has adopted a declaration of "norms" aimed at immigrants who might wish to settle in the town, according to today's Canadian Press. Sponsor of the declaration, Andre Drouin, one of six town councillors, said it was passed in reaction to a number of culture clashes recently in Canada. The 5-page declaration includes a prohibition on stoning women or burning them with acid; a prohibition on carrying weapons to school, including a Sikh kirpan; a prohibition on sex-segregated swimming pools; a provision that female police officers can arrest male suspects; a declaration that women can drive, dance and make decisions on their own; and a statement that children sing Christmas songs at Christmas and adults can drink alcohol. B'nai Brith Quebec called the declaration "an anti-immigrant, anti-ethnic backlash". Salam Elmenyawi, head of the Muslim Council of Montreal, said the declaration is insulting and full of stereotypes.

Public Expressions of Religion Act Reintroduced In Congress

Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KA) yesterday reintroduced into Congress the Public Expressions of Religion Act that would ban plaintiffs from recovering attorneys' fees in civil rights suits against local governments when the successfully challenge public displays of religion and faith. (Press release.) Currently the 1976 Civil Rights Attorney Fees Awards Act (42 USC 1988(b) ) permits recovery of attorneys' fees by successful plaintiffs in Section 1983 suits. The bill was introduced in the last session of Congress. It passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 244-173, but was not voted on in the Senate.

New Mexico Bishops Back Outlawing Of Cockfighting

The Catholic Conference of New Mexico announced that the state's bishops support proposals ( SB 10 and SB 70) in the legislature to ban cockfighting. New Mexico is only one of two states where the practice is still legal. A report from the Catholic News Agency yesterday (which insists on referring to the practice as "rooster fighting") quotes Catholic Conference Executive Director Allen Sanchez: "The church teaches that we are supposed help God's creatures and there are established principles about how to care for animals. It is now time to pass this prohibition and move on to more important issues"-- such as abolishing the death penalty and prohibiting embryonic stem cell research.

Britain's Blair Give Catholic Church 21 Months To Prepare For Gay Adoptions

In Britain yesterday, Prime Minister Tony Blair announced a compromise of sorts with the Catholic Church on implementation of Britain's new Equality Act that prohibits discrimination against gays and lesbians. (See prior posting.) Catholic adoption agencies will not be granted an exemption from the law's provision, but they will have 21 months to prepare for the new rules. Ekklesia reports that if Parliament approves Blair's proposal in February, Catholic agencies will have until the end of 2008 until the rules apply to them. Until then, they will have a "statutory duty" to refer gay couples to other agencies.

Zimbabwe Supreme Court Considers Rastafarian Challenge To School Rules

In Zimbabwe last week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case challenging the expulsion of a first-grade boy from Ruvheneko Primary School in Glen Norah because he came to school wearing dreadlocks. The Harare Herald today reports that the boy's family is challenging the school's rule as a violation of the Rastafarian student's religious freedom. Zimbabwe's Constitution (Sec. 19) protects freedom of religion and conscience, but provides that actions "under authority of law ... with respect to standards or qualifications to be required in relation to places of education" do not violate these protections unless the action is shown to "not to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society". The boy's lawyer argued to the Supreme Court that the school's grooming provision was a rule and not a "law" as that term is used in the exclusion in Sec. 19. The first-grader is currently back in school under a lower court order that permitted him to attend wearing his dreadlocks pending a decision by the Supreme Court.

New Study Praises Ohio's Implementation of Faith-Based Initiative

Baylor University's Institute for Studies of Religion last week (press release) published Ohio Governor's Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives: A Case Study. Written by William Wubbenhorst and Dr. Byron Johnson, the study praises Ohio's experience, saying that it has "received far-reaching and bipartisan support and has by all accounts been responsible for achieving many positive outcomes." The report says that Ohio's efforts were guided by three important principles: "a) The importance of protecting the faith identity of faith-based organizations; b) Assuring the appropriate safeguards against proselytizing when using public funds, both through clear communication of church/state boundaries and the development of indirect funding mechanisms; and c) Developing a process for assessing the outcomes and assuring a level of accountability of publicly-funded services."

Rev. Robert Drinan-- Human Rights Advocate-- Dies At 86

Rev. Robert Drinan, the Roman Catholic priest who as a member of Congress and as a Georgetown Law School teacher served as a champion of international human rights died yesterday at the age of 86. Before entering Congress, Drinan served as Dean of Boston College Law School. Today's Washington Post chronicles his life, as does a release from Georgetown University. Elected in 1971, Drinan was the first Roman Catholic priest to serve as a voting member of Congress. He reluctantly resigned in 1981 after the Vatican ruled that priests could not hold legislative positions. (Code of Canon Law, Sec. 285(3)). Drinan authored 12 books, including Can God and Caesar Co-Exist? Balancing Religious Freedom & International Law (Yale Press, 2004); God and Caesar on the Potomac: A Pilgrimage of Conscience (Michael Glazier, Inc., 1985); Religion, The Courts, And Public Policy (McGraw-Hill Book, 1963).

New Prisoner Claims Include Kosher Catholics and Employment Discrimination

In Presley v. Captain, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5235 (MD AL, Jan. 19, 2007), an Alabama federal district court permitted an inmate to proceed with free exercise and RLUIPA claims stemming from the alleged denial of access to religious property central to the prisoner's Native American religion at the time of his transfer to a different penal institution.

In Guzzi v. Thompson, (D MA, Jan. 25, 2007), a Massachusetts federal district court denied a preliminary injunction to a Catholic prisoner who claimed that his rights under RLUIPA were infringed when he was denied kosher meals. He argued that traditional concepts of Catholicism require the same dietary laws followed by Jewish sects. However the court held that where the plaintiff makes an argument for protection of a religious practice not generally associated with the system of beliefs of Christian-Catholics to which he belongs, it may properly decide that plaintiff has not shown the likelihood of success on the merits required to support a temporary injunction.

In Rouse v. Caruso, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4941 (ED MI, Kan. 24, 2007), a Michigan United States Magistrate Judge permitted an inmate to amend his civil rights complaint to allege that a Department of Corrections employee discriminated against him based on his religious beliefs. The court held that while verbal harassment disparaging a prisoner's religious beliefs "does not embody the type of coercive pressure which amounts to a substantial burden on religious exercise" under RLUIPA, a claim that a prisoner was terminated from his prison employment because of his religion does state a valid RLUIPA claim.

RLUIPA Claim By S.C. Church Dismissed, But 1st Amendment Claim Can Proceed

In Christian Methodist Episcopal Church v. Montgomery, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5133 (D SC, Jan. 18, 2007), a South Carolina federal district court dismissed a RLUIPA claim, but permitted a First Amendment claim to proceed, in a damage action brought by a church that was being asked to comply with zoning ordinances by the town of Atlantic Beach, SC. The suit alleged harassment by officials, but the church was not closed down. The court rejected plaintiffs' RLUIPA claim because the owners of of the church's building never attempted to obtain a zoning variance. It held that the Church could not prove that the Town's zoning laws substantially burden the exercise of religion by merely requiring the owners-- or the church as tenant through assignment of the owners-- to apply for a special use permit. The court also found that the Town has a compelling interest in requiring the owners of the land to be involved in the zoning application, instead of permitting the church alone as tenant to apply.

The court however permitted plaintiffs to proceed with their First Amendment claim that officials interfered with their free exercise rights by harassment such as repeatedly stopping by, inspecting and entering the church building, even during services. It held that the Town, and two officials if they acted intentionally, could be liable for damages.