NFL Says Church Super Bowl Parties Violate Copyright Laws

Yesterday's Indianapolis Star reports that the NFL is telling churches-- even through demand letters sent by overnight express-- that they will be violating the copyright laws if they host Super Bowl parties on large-screen TV's. NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said: "We have contracts with our (TV) networks to provide free over-the-air television for people at home. The network economics are based on television ratings and at-home viewing. Out-of-home viewing is not measured by Nielsen." The only exception is for sports bars and other businesses that show televised sports as a part of their everyday operations. The NFL also objected to plans by Fall Creek Baptist Church in Indianapolis to show a video at their Super Bowl party of the Christian testimonies of Colts coach Tony Dungy and Chicago Bears coach Lovie Smith. The NFL says that for groups other than businesses that regularly show televised sports events, gatherings are limited to use of one TV set no larger than 55 inches, no admission fees may be charged (even to pay for refreshments), no "message" may be promoted in connection with the game, and "Super Bowl" may not be used in the publicity. Christianity Today's Weblog has more on this story.

UPDATE: Compliments of a posting on Religionlaw by Marty Lederman, here are the copyright law sections involved. 17 USC 106(5) gives the copyright owner the "exclusive right" to "publicly display" an audiovisual work. However there is an exemption in 17 USC 110(5)(B) for displays that comply with certain limitations.

Senate Chaplain Cancels Out After Finding Conference's Political Slant

The Associated Press reports today that U.S. Senate Chaplain Barry Black has cancelled a speech he was scheduled to give at next month's Reclaiming America for Christ Conference after conference promoters put his photo-- along with those of prominent conservatives-- on a brochure promoting the event. Black told Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that he was concerned that his appearance would violate the Senate chaplain's "historic tradition of being nonpolitical, nonpartisan, nonsectarian". Black is the first military chaplain, the first African-American and the first Seventh-day Adventist to hold the post of Senate Chaplain. When Black agreed to appear at the Reclaiming America for Christ Conference, he was not aware of the conservative slant of the event or who the other speakers would be. [Thanks to Blog from the Capital for the link, and to Steven Sholk for a heads up on the story.]

President Speaks At National Prayer Breakfast

Yesterday President Bush spoke at the 55th National Prayer Breakfast held at the Hilton Washington Hotel. In his remarks (full text) he said: "Prayer changes hearts. Prayer changes lives. And prayer makes us a more compassionate and giving people. When we pray we surrender our will to the Almighty, and open ourselves up to His priorities and His touch. His call to love our neighbors as we would like to be loved ourselves is something that we hear when we pray. And we answer that call by reaching out to feed the hungry and clothe the poor and aid the widow and the orphan."

This year's breakfast attracted 3600 guests from 170 nations and all 50 states and U.S. territories. The keynote speaker was Dr. Frances Collins, Director of the Human Genome Project. Among the other speakers was U.S. Congressman Mike McIntyre (D-NC) who hosted a spiritual heritage tour of the U.S. Capitol the night before the breakfast. (Topsail-Island.info).

Preliminary Injunction Granted To Student Anti-Abortion Protester

In M.A.L. v. Kinsland, (ED MI, Jan. 31, 2007), a Michigan federal district court granted a preliminary injunction against school officials to an 8th-grade student who was prevented from expressing his anti-abortion views at school last October to mark "Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity"-- an event sponsored by a Christian youth organization. (See prior posting.) The parties subsequently agreed that the student could wear red tape on his wrists and a sweat shirt containing a protest slogan. However they remained at odds on the school's literature distribution policy. The court found it likely that the plaintiff would succeed on the merits of his claim that the school's literature distribution policy is an unconstitutional violation of his First Amendment rights. A release by Alliance Defense Fund discusses the case as does an article in the Monroe (MI) News.

British Humanist Offical Urges End To Bishops' Seats In House of Lords

Ekklesia yesterday reported that in connection with discussions by the British government about House of Lords reform, Hanne Stinson, chief executive of the British Humanist Association, has urged that the practice of automatically setting aside 26 seats for bishops of the Church of England be ended. The House of Lords has a total of 746 members. In the past there have been suggestions about expanding representation to other religious groups, but Congregationalists, Quakers and others have objected to "religious representation" on principle. Stinson has urged that all appointment of Lords be solely on merit.

Federal Employee Has Partial Win On Discriminatory E-Mail Policy Challenge

In Gee v. Kempthorne, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6695 (D ID, Jan. 30, 2007), an Idaho federal district court has dismissed as moot a First Amendment and RFRA claim by a Mormon employee of the Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation, but has permitted the employee to move ahead with an equal protection claim for a declaratory judgment that in the future, regardless of the Department's computer use policy, Plaintiff may not be treated differently in the enforcement of those policies because of his religious beliefs. The case grew out of limitations placed on plaintiff's use of his office computer for non-government business after he sent out e-mails objecting to other e-mails he had received from Department employees about recognition of June as Gay and Lesbian Pride Month.

Court Rejects Delay Motion In Wiccan Grave Marker Suit

A federal district court judge in Wisconsin has denied a motion by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to delay the start of a trial in a lawsuit seeking a decision on adding the Wiccan pentacle to the list of permissible symbols on veterans' memorial markers in national cemeteries. The Associated Press reported yesterday that in a one-line order, the court rejected a motion by the VA in Circle Sanctuary v. Nicholson to delay the trial while it finalizes a new rule on gravestone markers. The suit alleges that the VA has already delayed ruling on the matter for over nine years. (See prior posting.) Trial is now set to begin on the matter on June 29.

California Church Moves Ahead With RLUIPA Damage Claim

Yesterday's North County (CA) Times reports that Elsinore Christian Center will move ahead with a $1.9 million damage claim against the City of Lake Elsinore, CA for losses the church suffered when it was prevented from relocating to a downtown building. This follows the church's win last August in the 9th Circuit which upheld the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. (See prior posting.) A Los Angeles federal district court judge set January 31 as the trial date for this next phase of the case.

Former House Speaker Criticizes Wm. & Mary President

Former U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Newt Gingrich has published an article in National Review Online severely critical of Gene R. Nichol, the president of the College of William and Mary who decided that the state school's chapel would only display a cross on Sundays and during Christian services. (See prior posting.) Gingrich said that the President's "reasoning bears the unmistakable influence of former Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor, whose major contribution to church-state thinking centers on her concept of endorsement.... Unfortunately, the "endorsement test”"has proven itself a decidedly unhelpful legal criterion. It is indeterminate, bordering on arbitrary, because it focuses primarily on subjective perceptions; its first consideration is not how the law actually treats people, but rather how people feel they are treated by the law. Taken to its logical conclusion, the endorsement test leads to the rule of the perpetually aggrieved, a tyranny of the easily offended."

Arizona Bills Would Aid Women Who Flee FLDS Polygamous Community

Yesterday's Arizona Republic reported that two bills have been introduced into the Arizona legislature to assist women who have fled Colorado City's FLDS Church. Rep. David Lujan, an attorney with the non-profit Justice for Children, introduced HB 2325 that would severely limit courts in granting custody or unsupervised visitation rights to a parent who is practicing polygamy or child bigamy. This is designed to prevent having wives who have fled from being forced to send their children back to a father and his other wives. The second bill, HB 2647, would provide funding for transitional housing to women who have fled a polygamous relationship or have been victimized by child bigamy.

Canadian Marriage Commissioner Charged For Refusing To Perform Gay Marriage

In Regina, Saskatchewan yesterday the Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal held a hearing on a discrimination complaint against one of the Canadian province's marriage commissioners who refused to perform a same-sex wedding ceremony on religious grounds. Canadian Press yesterday reported on the hearing. A lawyer for the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission said that marriage commissioners are required by law to provide civil wedding services for gay couples since same-sex marriage has been legalized in the province. However Orville Nichols, a devout Baptist, said he would have never taken the position as a marriage commissioner if at the time he was appointed there had been a requirement that he perform same-sex marriages.

Dallas Restrictions On Feeding Homeless Challenged

Today's Dallas (TX) Morning News reports that Rip Parker Memorial Homeless Ministry and Big Heart Ministries have filed a federal lawsuit to have Dallas' food distribution ordinance declared unconstitutional. The ordinance, which the city has enforced since February 2006, limits the places where groups can distribute food to the hungry. The primary permissible location is the city's downtown Day Resource Center. The ordinance stopped stopped charitable groups from serving food in vacant lots and cardboard box encampments under bridges. The suit claims that the ordinance violates the plaintiffs' free exercise of religion.

6th Circuit En Banc Rehearing Sought In "Teen Ranch" Case

On Tuesday, a petition for en banc review by the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals was filed in Teen Ranch v. Udow (see prior posting). The panel's decision upheld Michigan's decision to cut off placement of abused, neglected and delinquent children with Teen Ranch, finding its program coerces religious participation by the youths. Representing Teen Ranch, the Alliance Defense Fund announced the appeal which argues that teenagers initially placed with Teen Ranch can opt out and be transferred to a different rehabilitation program. The Petition For Rehearing argues that these "'opt-out' procedures result in 'private choice' controlling the flow of state funds to religious groups, thus insulating the state from an Establishment Clause violation."

Canadian Argues For Limiting Tax Exemptions For Some Religions

Canadian Catholic News yesterday called attention to an essay by Janice Gross Stein published last Fall in Literary Review of Canada. The University of Toronto political scientist argued that Canada should not make tax exemptions available to religious groups that fail to comply with "Canadian values". This would include the Catholic Church because of its refusal to ordain women. Constitutional lawyer Peter Lauwers said Stein is attempting to force change on religious groups and this, he said, would meant that "the state is no longer being neutral".

Episcopal Diocese Sues 11 Breakaway Churches

The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia has taken the next legal step in the property disputes between the Diocese and eleven local churches in which a majority of members have voted to leave the Episcopal Church. (See prior postings 1, 2.) Eight of those local congregations have already filed lawsuits seeking to transfer their property to the Church of Nigeria through the Convocation of Anglicans in North America. The Living Church Foundation reported yesterday that in each of the eleven suits, the Diocese is seeking a declaration "that there has been an improper trespass, conversion, alienation and use of the real and personal property”; an order upholding "the trust, proprietary and contract rights of the diocese"; an order restraining further use and occupancy of the property by the local congregations; an order transferring legal title to and control of the property to the Diocese; and an order requiring an accounting by local congregations of their "use of all real and personal property".

IRS Posts Online Training Course For Tax-Exempt Organizations

In mid-January, the Internal Revenue Service posted on its website a new web-based version of its Exempt Organizations Workshop on tax compliance issues confronted by small and mid-sized tax exempt organizations, including churches and other religious groups. The Stay Exempt web course covers keeping tax-exempt status, taxation of unrelated business income, employment issues, completing Form 990 and record disclosures.

Namibian Church Sues Government Paper For Defamation

In Namibia, the fast-growing Universal Church of the Kingdom of God filed a defamation suit seeking damages from the government-owned newspaper that ran an article characterizing the church as a "Satanic sect". Today's Namibian reports that the High Court suit against the Southern Times (jointly owned by the Namibian and Zimbabwean governments) focuses on a December 2005 headline that read "State bans 'Satanic' sect' " and which was published above a photograph showing the church's building in Windhoek. In fact the ban was in Zambia, and came after a riot stemming from rumors about the church.

Proposal For Court-Stripping Amendment To Arizona Constitution

Arizona State Senator Karen Johnson yesterday introduced a proposed state constitutional amendment (SCR 1026) that would strip all state courts in Arizona of jurisdiction over

any matter to the extent that relief is sought against the federal, the state or a local government or against an officer or agent [of such governments], whether or not ... acting in his official or personal capacity, concerning the government's of the officer's or the agent's acknowledgement of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty or government.

Today's Arizona Daily Star says that Sen. Johnson has introduced the amendment in reaction to decisions in other states finding problems with "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance and with 10 Commandments displays on public property. Johnson explained her concerns:

In the (federal) Constitution, what it means is that there is to be no state religion. But we're supposed to have religion in everything — the opportunity to have religion in everything. I want religion in government, I want my government to have a faith-based perspective. The courts do their own thing. They're making up law out of how they feel about things. They're not following the Constitution.

The proposed amendment would not affect federal court jurisdiction over suits challenging governmental support of religion.

Israeli Court Convicts Muslim Husband For Unilateral Divorce

In Israel, a Magistrate's Court in Nazareth has convicted a Muslim man of ending his marriage without his wife's agreement and against her will. Yesterday's Haaretz reports that the husband began proceedings in a religious court, but became angry at accusations made by his wife and called for a divorce. Magistrate Court Judge Taufik Katili in his ruling wrote that "defendant's act was arbitrary, carried out during ongoing court discussions while ignoring court procedures. By so doing the defendant objectified and demonized the complainant while disregarding her autonomous will and right to joint determination over the fate of their relationship." The Magistrate's Court sentenced the man to five months of community service and a fine of NIS 30,000.

UPDATE: From Emory's Islamic Family Law site: "Israel's Women's Equal Rights Law 1951 provides penal sanction of imprisonment for husband's unilateral decision to divorce against wife's will and in absence of court judgement permitting such repudiation, but repudiation remains valid."

Rape Victim Denied Morning After Pill By Jail Worker With Religious Objections

The Associated Press yesterday reported on a case in Tampa, Florida in which a rape victim, after being taken to a rape crisis center where she was given the first dose of the morning-after pill, failed to get the needed second dose on time because of religious objections of a Tampa jail worker. While police were investigating the rape of the 21-year old college student, they discovered that she still owed a $4585 fine under an outstanding juvenile warrant from 2003. So they stopped their investigation and arrested the victim. That is where a jail worker refused to give the victim her next dose of medication on religious grounds. The victim ended up taking the second pill a day late after she was released from jail.