China Denies Falun Gong Persecution Stories

Earlier this week, according to Thursday's Shanghai Daily, the Chinese embassy in Canada issued a statement denying allegations that China was killing and harvesting organs for transplant from Falun Gong practitioners. (See prior posting). The Chinese said that an independent investigation by journalists and diplomats, including U.S. embassy personnel, had proven the allegations to be false.

The embassy’s statement said: "Falun Gong is an anti-science, anti-humanity and anti-society evil cult which has been banned in China in accordance with law. It uses religion … as camouflage to brainwash and control the practitioners. It preaches that human can, through psychological meditation, from invisible magic wheels inside their bodies, cure their illness without medical treatment. It spreads Dooms Day theory, [and] boasts that Li Hongzhi, founder of Falun Gong, is the most powerful God …."

Orthodox Church Opposes Liberalization Of Ukraine's Religion Law

The Union of Councils For Jews in the Former Soviet Union posted a news story today reporting that the usually feuding Kiev and Moscow Patriarchates of the Russian Orthodox Church in the Ukraine are at least temporarily united to oppose liberalization of Ukraine's law on religious registration. Currently a religious organization needs at least 10 members to obtain registration. A proposal would reduce this to 3 members. both branches of the Orthodox church also want their faith classified as "traditional" and therefore entitled to special governmental treatment.

Igumen Evstraty of the Kiev Patriarchate said that the country's current law is so liberal that: "[I]t's enough to gather ten people and announce whatever you want-even that they want to worship Winnie the Pooh-and they can't be denied registration." A spokesman for the Moscow Patriarchate even called for "non-traditional" faiths to be investigated to determine "whether they cut the throats of babies or exert pressure on the psyches of people." However, a government Department of Religious Affairs official said that every religion has the right to exist and that registration requirements should be the same for all groups.

9th Circuit Hears Arguments In High School Christian Bible Club Case

There have been a number of cases around the country involving attempts by Christian groups on college campuses to be recognized even though they exclude non-Christians from formal membership. Yesterday, according to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle heard arguments in a similar case involving a high school Bible group. At Kentridge High School near Seattle, for official membership and voting rights in the "Truth and Bible" club, students are required to sign a statement affirming "the Bible to be the inspired, the only infallible, authoritative Word of God." Kentridge's Associated Student Body, applying the school's non-discrimination policy, refused to recognize the group, which means that, while it can meet on campus, it cannot engage in fundraising there, be featured in the yearbook or advertise as broadly as recognized groups. Represented by the Alliance Defense Fund, the student group argued that its rights to free speech, free association and equal access are being violated.

Belarus Dispute Over Taking Church For Economic Development

It is not only in the United States that courts are dealing with issue of municipalities using eminent domain to take private property, including church property, for economic development. Forum18 reports on a similar issue in Belarus. On July 21, the Minsk City Economic Court ruled that New Life Church must sell - at a low price - a cow shed that it remodeled to use as a house of worship. Officials say that the city of Minsk's Development Plan requires that the building be demolished. New Life has been unable to obtain official registration of its building under the country's Religion Law because itneverr got formal approval to convert the cow shed into a church.

When Do Online Security Precautions Violate First Amendment?

A column in yesterday's St. Petersburg (FL) Times discusses a pending federal lawsuit against the Hillsborough County School Board that raises interesting First Amendment questions about e-mail campaigns by religious, and other, organizations. During a dispute last year over religious holidays in the public schools, the Florida Family Association set up a Web site for users to e-mail the School Board in favor of keeping Christmas in the schools. When numerous e-mails started arriving from the same Internet address, the School Board set its computers to reject them, fearing a possible automated e-mail attack on its server. It took a day and a half to determine the e-mails were legitimate and to remove the block. However, FFA's attorney, Don Conwell, argues that the number of e-mails being received were too small to cause a legitimate fear of a denial-of-use attack. He says that blocking communication from one particular group of citizens, based on who they are or on the content of their message, violates the rights of free speech, assembly and petition. Once the government accepts e-mail from some citizens, he says, then it cannot pick and choose. It cannot say, "You can e-mail us only if you don't belong to Group X."

Nun Loses In Seeking Canadian Refuge Under Legal Technicality

In Canada, a Nigerian nun who claims that she will suffer religious persecution if she is returned home has come up with an interesting legal maneuver to obtain refugee status. Yesterday's Canadian Press reports that Sister Nkemhurunaya Juliana Eligwe has been helping people of the Sandy Bay Ojibway First Nation, on the shore of Lake Manitoba, for more than two years. After immigration officials rejected her asylum request, the Ojibways made her an honorary member of their band. Then she claimed that she is protected under Canada's Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that provides that "every person registered as an Indian under the Indian Act has the right to enter into and remain in Canada." However, on July 19, Federal Court Judge Sean Harrington refused to block her deportation. While his decision rested on various procedural issues, he wrote: "The proposition put forward, if brought to its extreme, is that each and every band . . . has the power to usurp the discretion of the minister of citizenship and immigration by accepting non-residents as band members and thereby granting them permanent resident status." The case is Sandy Bay Ojibway First Nation v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, 2006 FC 903 (Fed. Ct., July 19, 2006). The decision may be appealed.

Georgia Supreme Court OKs Judicial Determination Of Church Membership List

In Bolden v. Barton, (Ga. Sup. Ct., July 6,2006), the Georgia Supreme Court held that in a property dispute among members of a church that governed itself congregationally, the trial court acted properly in ordering an election to decide which of two factions should control church property. The fact that the court had to determine which individuals were members eligible to vote in order to decide which faction represented a majority of the church's membership did not involve the court in deciding matters of religious doctrine.

In Malaysia: A Step Forward For Women and Backward For Free Speech

In Malaysia, a coalition of several non-governmental organizations called "Article 11", has been actively organizing forums to discuss freedom of religion. The discussions have created such tensions that the government has asked the group to end the forums and has told the media to stop printing articles and broadcasting about religious issues. The New Straits Times yesterday reported that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said that the sensationalization of religious issues would bring about "unwanted situations".

Meanwhile, Malaysia's National Fatwa Council has ruled that women may be appointed by State religious authorities as Syariah judges . However, according to the New Straits Times, the women judges will not be allowed to preside over hudud and qisas cases, i.e. those that deal with offences and punishments that are interpreted by Muslim juristic scholars to be derived from the Quran and the Sunnah. In Malaysia these offenses are found in the Syariah Criminal Code Enactment.

Prisoner Free Exercise Cases Abound

In Hill v. Snyder, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50717 (SD IL, July 25, 2006), a state prisoner who adheres to the Hebrew Israelite faith, claimed various infringements of his free exercise rights. An Illinois federal trial court permitted him to proceed with claims relating to the provision of vegan meals, the contents of the food he is given, the discontinuance of his vegan meals, and the requirement that he provide written verification of his religious affiliation from an outside clergy member. However, the court found he had no right to variety in his meals, to trade food items with other inmates, nor to extra time to eat.

Greene v. Solano County Jail, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50380 (ED CA, July 24, 2006), involved a challenge to the policy at Solano's Claybank facility that precluded maximum security inmates from attending group religious services. A California federal district court agreed with prison authorities that security concerns adequately justified the policy and rejected plaintiff's claims based on the First Amendment, RLUIPA, the Equal Protection Clause and the Eighth Amendment.

In Ha'min v. Montgomery County Sheriffs, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50448 (MD TN, July 21, 2006), a Tennessee federal district court judge dismissed the First Amendment claims of a Muslim prisoner who challenged a Tennessee jail's failure to provide regular Friday Muslim religious services and its failure to have copies of the Quran in the jail library while the library did have donated copies of the Bible.
UPDATE: Here is the earlier magistrate's recommendation in the case, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73223.

Johnson v. Rees, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50556 (ED KY, July 20, 2006) involved rejection by a Kentucky federal district court of a somewhat unusual prisoner Free Exercise and RLUIPA claim. Inmate Johnny Johnson alleged that he is a Jehovah's Witness whose religious faith requires him to "witness" and to distribute religious literature to others. Prison rules permit outside organizations, including the Jehovah's Witnesses, to donate religious literature to the prison's chapel where other inmates are free to take extra copies. But Johnson is not allowed to take that literature and distribute it elsewhere directly to other inmates. The court said that since Johnson can distribute the literature inside the chapel library, he is not totally prevented from engaging in the conduct his faith requires. Only time and place are circumscribed.

Dissent In Washington DOMA Case Argues Establishment Clause

Yesterday, in Andersen v. King County (WA. Sup. Ct., July 26, 2006), the Washington state Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision with six different opinions upheld its Defense of Marriage Act against challenges under various provisions of the state constitution. (New York Times coverage.) The dissenting opinion of Justice Bobb J. Bridge contains an interesting anti-establishment argument. Justice Bridge argues that DOMA is "clearly an unconstitutional foray into state-sanctioned religious belief":

What we ought not to address is marriage as the sacrament or religious rite--an area into which the State is not entitled to intrude at all and which is governed by articles of faith.... As succinctly put by amici ...: "To ban gay civil marriage because some, but not all, religions disfavor it, reflects an impermissible State religious establishment."... After all, we permit civil divorce though many religions prohibit it--why such fierce protection of marriage at its beginning but not its end?...

To many, same-sex relationships and same-sex marriages are contrary to religious teachings. But none of the plaintiffs in the cases before us today seek acceptance of same-sex marriage within a particular religious community. They seek access to civil marriage. Some churches and religious organizations may refuse to solemnize same-sex unions, and that is their right in the free exercise of religion under our constitution. A religious or moral objection to same-sex marriage is not, however, a legitimate state interest that can support the DOMA....

[R]eligious restrictions on the institution of marriage have never governed civil marriage in this country, nor would it be constitutionally permissible for them to do so. For example, historically many religions have strictly forbidden marriage outside of the denomination, but these churches could not prevent interdenominational civil marriages because "marriage was [ultimately] a state matter, not subject to . . . religious restrictions."... This court cannot endorse the use of state law to impose religious sensibilities or religiously-based moral codes on others' most intimate life decisions.... The DOMA reflects a religious viewpoint; religious doctrine should not govern state regulation of civil marriage.

House Members With Opposing Views Have Dinner Over Church-State Issues

The Forward earlier this week reported on an unlikely group of House of Representatives members who have formed a discussion group to focus on church-state issues. The members are Democrats Steve Israel (NY), Susan Davis (CA) and Henry Waxman (CA). The Republicans in the dinner group are Todd Aiken (MO), John Hostettler (IN), and Walter Jones (NC). The diversity of the members is illustrated by the ratings they received in 2005 from the Family Research Council on whether their voting records reflect "the Judeo-Christian worldview". Waxman and Davis got a rating of 0 and Israel had a 8. Aiken, Hostettler and Jones each had a rating of 100.

Rehearing Denied; Supplemental Opinion Issued In Notre Dame Funding Case

Yesterday, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals denied an en banc rehearing in Laskowski v. Spellings, (7th Cir., July 26, 2006), a case challenging on Establishment Clause grounds the receipt of federal funds by Notre Dame University for use by it to fund a Catholic teacher training program. In April, a 3-judge panel held that it was possible that the lower court could order Notre Dame to repay the $500,000 grant to the federal Treasury. Along with yesterday's denial of a rehearing, the original panel wrote a supplementary opinion clarifying that whether Notre Dame had to make restitution of the funds depended on whether or not it had reason to know that the grant it was receiving was illegal. The opinion pointed out that Congress cannot make grants to religious institutions without imposing conditions to assure that the funds will be used only for secular purposes. It continued: "Whether appropriate conditions were imposed by the Secretary of Education and were properly observed or implemented by Notre Dame are the issues on the merits that the district court will be resolving in the first instance on remand." The Fort Wayne News-Sentinel reports on the decision.

Greek Government To Build Athens' First Mosque

After 30 years of negotiations and failed attempts, the government of Greece is poised to approve building of Athens' first mosque, and government funds will be used for its construction. Kathimerini reports that while 200,000 Muslims live in Athens, there is still no official place of worship for them. The Inner Cabinet on Tuesday approved plans by Public Works and Environment Minister Giorgos Souflias to do something about this. In April, 10,000 people had petitioned the Education and Religion Ministry asking for the project to move forward.

Report On Religious Liberty In The Americas

Zenit continues to reprint portions of the report by Aid to the Church In Need on religious freedom around the world. Here are the sections of the report dealing with religious freedom in the Americas- 1, 2. Here is what the report has to say about conditions in the United States:

In the United States, the debate involving the conflict between two different ideas of the separation or distinction between religion and the state institutions is played out at the level of civil and individual rights.

The conflict between American society and the Islamic communities is no exception. The latter complain of attacks against their places of meeting and prayer. They pursue legal paths in their attempts to introduce Koranic law into the legal system as has happened in Canada.

Other parts of the report were the subject of a prior posting.

Newdow Appeals "In God We Trust" Loss To 9th Circuit

The Pacific Justice Institute has recently announced that an appeal to the 9th Circuit is being filed in Newdow v. Congress of the United States. In the case, a California federal district court upheld the constitutionality of "In God We Trust" on U.S. coins. (See prior posting.) [Thanks to How Appealing for the information.]

House Bill Proposes Prison Goods and Services For Non-Profits, Including Churches

Congress is proposing a new kind of governmental support to non-profit organizations, including religious organizations. The scope of the program became clear when, on Monday, the Congressional Budget Office issued a Report on H.R. 2965, the Federal Prison Industries Competition in Contracting Act of 2005. As described by the Report:

The legislation would authorize the Attorney General to establish a new FPI [Federal Prison Industries] program in federal prisons that, subject to appropriation of the necessary amounts, would produce goods to be donated to nonprofit organizations instead of being offered for purchase to the federal government. In addition, FPI would be authorized to contract with nonprofit organizations and certain public entities for the use of inmate labor to provide charitable services. The bill would authorize the appropriation of $12 million for fiscal year 2008 and $48 million over the 2008-2011 period for these programs.

Section 10 of the bill permits programs to be created to furnish prison-made goods to non-profit or religious organizations that "provide goods or services to low-income individuals who would likely otherwise have difficulty purchasing such products or services in the commercial market." Eligible organizations can suggest programs to FPI.

Section 10 more generally permits any religious (or other non-profit) organization that qualifies under Sections 501(c)(3) or 501(d) of the Internal Revenue Code to contract with the Inmate Work Training Administrator to employ inmates at below minimum wage rates. While there are various restrictions insuring that inmates will only provide non-profit services, and that inmates will not be discriminated against on the basis of religion (or on the basis of race, sex, national origin, disability or political belief), nothing in the bill appears to preclude using inmates to perform services that have religious content.

The bill has been approved by the House Judiciary Committee and will move to the full House for a vote.

Cert. Filed In Maine School Voucher Case

A petition for certiorari has been filed in the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review of the Maine Supreme Court's decision in Anderson v. Town of Durham, according to today's New York Sun. The decision upheld a state school voucher program for students from small towns with no high schools. Towns may pay for those students to attend a non-sectarian public or a private school, but they may not pay for attendance at religious parochial schools. (See prior posting.)

Required DNA Sample Does Not Violate Free Exercise Clause

A New York federal district court has rejected a free exercise challenge to the federal DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act. Kurt Kavoukian, on probation after serving a sentence for firearms violations, argued that requiring him to provide a DNA sample is an intrusion into his body prohibited by his religion. In United States v. Kavoukian, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50014 (ND NY, July 20, 2006), the court found that the statute, designed to establish a federal DNA database to assist in the identification, arrest, and prosecution of criminals, is a permissible neutral law of general application.

White House Faith-Based Conference In Austin

Yesterday the White House hosted a Conference on Faith Based and Community Initiatives in Austin, Texas. Today's San Antonio Express-News reports on the conference. The article's lead is: "At the intersection of government and religion, Gov. Rick Perry sounded something like a preacher Tuesday as he touted public funds for faith-based and community groups helping the poor, the addicted and refugees."

Liberia Reassures Muslims On Wearing Of Veil

Liberia's Justice Minister Cllr. Frances Johnson-Morris reaffirmed the government's commitment to religious liberty, countering a controversial statement by Police Director Beatrice Munah Sieh who said that people of that faith would not be permitted to cover their faces while walking on the streets. AllAfrica.com reported yesterday that the Justice Minister assured Muslims that the government will protect the Islamic Community like any other religious group. She said Muslims will be allowed to dress in accordance with their religious beliefs. The Police Director's statement was made few days after masked robbers were arrested, and without an understanding of its legal implications.