Suit Threatened Over Who Can Use City Space For National Day of Prayer

In Plano, Texas, City Council faces a possible lawsuit over who gets to use Council Chambers for this year's May 1 National Day of Prayer event. Today's Dallas Morning News reports that Roy Frady of Plano's WillowCreek Fellowship Church has been frozen out. In past years, his group of mostly Christian pastors has reserved council chambers for the prayer event. A city rule allows groups to book the chamber up to 90 days in advance of an event, as long as the city does not have a conflicting need for the room. In recent years another multi-faith group has been first to reserve the space. This year, Frady thought he was first to book, but found that a new group, the Multicultural Outreach Roundtable-- which is appointed by city council as an official committee-- already had a multi-faith prayer event scheduled for May 1. By designating MCOR's event as an official city function, this exempted it from the 90-day rule. Frady says that this maneuver, allowing the city's favored group book early, has violated the Establishment Clause by favoring one expression of religion over another. Frady, represented by the Liberty Legal Institute (press release), has given the city until Wednesday to respond to his letter (full text) objecting to the city's actions.

Saudi Arabia Revises Controversial Textbooks

Today's Yemen Times reports that Saudi Arabia has reacted to widespread criticism of the textbooks used in its schools. After 9-11, critics contended that Saudi textbooks furthered a militant Islamist approach and glorified violence against Jews. Now the Saudi education ministry has issued new books, and made them fully available on the Internet. They still focus heavily on Islam and teach children they must reject all other religions. They reject secular pan-Arabism and promote global Muslim solidarity. The curriculum contains almost no world history other than the history of Islam. However the new books are significantly more modern than the older ones. There is no incitement against Shiites and a significant reduction in the anti-Jewish, anti-Zionist content.

New Bin Laden Message Focuses On European Publication of Muhammad Drawings

Yesterday, a new message from Osama bin Laden was released on a militant website that has carried his statements in the past. It coincided with the fifth anniversary of the beginning of the war in Iraq. This time the message focused on "insulting drawings" of the Prophet Muhammad that were first published in a Danish newspaper, and then elsewhere. The AP, CNS News and Al Jazeera all cover the story. The full text of the message (English translation) is available from the NEFA website.

In his message, bin Laden threatens Europe over the drawings, saying that their publication is a more serious matter than the bombing of "modest mud villages which have collapsed onto our women and children." He says that publication of the drawings "came in the framework of a new Crusade in which the Pope and the Vatican has played a large, lengthy role." He also charges that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia could have put an end tho the publishing of the cartoons if he had wanted to exert his influence. Bin Laden rejects European reliance on freedom of speech to justify publication of the Muhammad drawings, pointing to laws in various European countries banning Holocaust denial, or, as he phrases it, laws that "suppress the freedom of those who cast doubt on the statistics of an historical event."

4th Circuit Panel Hears City Council Prayer Arguments-- O'Connor on Panel

Yesterday the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Turner v. City Council of the City of Fredericksburg. The district court in its decision (full text) dismissed the claim by city council member Hashmel Turner that his First Amendment rights were violated when he was not permitted to offer a specifically Christian opening prayer at Fredricksburg (VA) city council meetings. Council policy required invocations to be nonsectarian. (See prior posting.) The Hampton Roads (VA) Daily Press and the Fredricksburg Free Lance-Star report that the 4th Circuit panel hearing oral arguments included retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Turner's attorney urged the court to hold that Turner's prayers at the beginning of council meetings should be considered private speech protected by the First Amendment, not speech on behalf of the government. He also argued that: "The mere use of the word Jesus isn't itself a denominational term. It encompasses many denominations." The Daily Press reports that "O'Connor called the case black and white in favor of the city."

Challenge To Illinois Moment of Silence Law Becomes Class Action

Last November, an Illinois federal district court issued a preliminary injunction blocking a suburban Chicago school district from enforcing Illinois' new mandatory moment of silence law. (See prior posting.) Now according to yesterday's Chicago Tribune, federal district Judge Robert Gettleman has agreed that the suit may be converted into a class action against school districts around the state on behalf of students statewide. However the court still must determine the best way to notify school districts of the expansion of the lawsuit. Judge Gettleman, while expressing concern about the vagueness of the challenged law, has not yet decided the case on the merits. Nor has he so far extended his preliminary injunction to other school districts. The AP, also reporting on the case said that Judge Gettleman indicated he had hoped that the legislature would have acted by now to fix problems with the law.

Defamation Claim Against Priest Dismissed; Emotional Distress Claim Can Go On

A McHenry County, Illinois trial court judge has dismissed a defamation claim brought against Catholic priest Luis Alfredo Rios by Angel Llavona, one of his parishioners, according to yesterday's Chicago Daily Herald. Llavona alleged that the priest's criticism of his work with the church's religious education program harmed his reputation as a teacher at Maine West High School in Des Plaines. (See prior posting.) Judge Maureen McIntyre said deciding that portion of the complaint would improperly involve the court in evaluating the church's teachings and rules. However, the court allowed Llavona to proceed with his claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. In so holding, the court rejected arguments by Rios' lawyer that the Establishment Clause precludes the court from passing on statements made by clergy during religious services. Judge McIntyre said that the claim could be adjudicated without passing on church practices, dogma or theology.

Saudi Appellate Court Orders Retrial of Religious Police Defendants

Today's International Herald Tribune reports that in Saudi Arabia, the Cassation Court has overturned a not guilty verdict entered by a lower court against two members of the country's religious police force. The two had been accused in the death of Sulaiman al-Huraisi, a security guard who died in custody of the Commission for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice after its raid on al-Huraisi's home looking for alcohol and drugs. (See prior posting.) The new decision, citing mistakes in the original trial, orders the Riyadh lower court judge who issued the initial verdict to question witnesses and members of the religious police again.

Court Says California Lacks Standing To Challenge Federal Weldon Amendment

The federal Weldon Amendment (background) denies federal funds to state and local governments if they discriminate against health care entities that refuse to provide abortions. California law requires emergency health care facilities to provide medically necessary abortions. Yesterday in State of California v. United States of America, (ND CA, March 18, 2008), a California federal district court dismissed California's constitutional challenge to the Weldon Amendment, finding that the state lacked standing and that its claim was not ripe for adjudication. The court said that there is no clear indication that California's law would constitute "discrimination" under the Weldon Amendment, so there is no indication that there is any present conflict between state and federal law. The complaint in the case had alleged that the federal law violated Congress' spending authority and infringed women's right to privacy. Today's San Francisco Chronicle reports on the court's decision.

HHS Secretary Criticizes Medical Board's Abortion Rights Position

Last Friday, U.S. Health and Human Services Director Mike Leavitt sent a letter (full text) to the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology objecting to its apparent policy of requiring physicians who wish to maintain their Board certification to comply with ethics rules of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). In November 2007, ACOG's Ethics Committee issued a report titled The Limits of Conscience Refusal in Reproductive Medicine. It conclude that physicians who have conscientious objections to performing abortions or other standard reproductive services "have the duty to refer patients in a timely manner to other providers." Leavitt said:

I am concerned that the actions taken by ACOG and ABOG could result in the denial or revocation of Board certification of a physician who -- but for his or her refusal, for example, to refer a patient for an abortion -- would be certified. These actions, in turn, could result in certain HHS-funded State and local governments, institutions, or other entities that require Board certification taking action against the physician based just on the Board's denial or revocation of certification. In particular, I am concerned that such actions by these entities would violate federal laws against discrimination.

Yesterday the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice issued a press release strongly criticizing Sec. Leavitt's letter, saying: "Secretary Leavitt's dogmatic indifference to the patient is bad medicine, misguided ethics, and political pandering. A great nation must make room for diverse beliefs--especially a nation founded on the principle of religious freedom."

Illinois Pharmacy Rules Argued Before State Supreme Court

Yesterday, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Morr-Fitz v. Blagojevich. In the case, a state appellate court had dismissed on justiciability grounds a challenge to State Pharmacy Board rules requiring drug stores to fill prescriptions for the "morning-after" pill, even where doing so violates a pharmacist's religious or moral beliefs. (See prior posting.) According to AP, the state argued to the Supreme Court that the pharmacists lack standing to pursue their lawsuit. Plaintiffs argued that they should be able to sue to protect their rights before their careers are ruined by license suspensions. A video of the oral arguments is available online from the Illinois Supreme Court's website.

White House Easter Egg Roll Scheduled

The White House has announced that its annual Easter Egg Roll will be held on Monday, March 24. The National Park Service is distributing free tickets on a first-come-first-served basis. The White House has also announced the scheduled entertainment for the event. The White House Visitor Center is hosting the State Egg Display. The American Egg Board selects an artist from each state to paint or decorate an egg for the display.

Obama Speaks Out On His Pastor's Views and On U.S. Race Relations

In a speech this morning, Presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama addressed the controversy over inflammatory rhetoric used in sermons by his long-time pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. As reported by Reuters today, Obama already has denounced Wright's comments, describing Wright as an "old uncle" to him. Wright has also now retired as pastor of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ. Nevertheless, Wright's comments continued to pose problems for Obama's campaign. Today the candidate delivered a major speech in Philadelphia addressing his views of his pastor and more broadly dealing with racial divisions in America. (Washington Post).

Here are some lengthy excerpts dealing with Rev. Wright from Obama's remarks. The full text of his speech titled "A More Perfect Union" is definitely worth reading:

[W]e've heard my former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation and that rightly offend white and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy, and in some cases, pain. For some, nagging questions remain: Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in the church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely, just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests or rabbis with which you strongly disagree.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country, a view that sees white racism as endemic and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam. As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems....

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television sets and YouTube, if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way. But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor....

Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety -- the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing and clapping and screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and, yes, the bitterness and biases that make up the black experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions -- the good and the bad -- of the community that he has served diligently for so many years. I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can disown my white grandmother, a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed her by on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe. These people are a part of me. And they are part of America, this country that I love....

We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro in the aftermath of her recent statements as harboring some deep-seated bias. But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America: to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality. The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked through, a part of our union that we have not yet made perfect.

Bishops' Blog Covers U.S. Papal Visit

The United States Conference of Bishops has created the USCCB's Papal Visit Blog, a new blog devoted to Pope Benedict XVI's six-day visit to the United States next month. Reporting on the blog, the Washington Post says: "No gossipy or scandalous entries."

Historic Vatican-Saudi Talks Explore Opening Church in Saudi Arabia

Yesterday's London Times reported that the Vatican is holding talks with Saudi Arabian authorities discussing the possibility of opening the first Roman Catholic church in Saudi Arabia. This became known the day after Qatar's first Catholic Church opened with an inaugural service attended by 15,000. The revolutionary step in Saudi-Catholic relations follows talks last year between King Abdullah and the Pope and the creation of a permanent Catholic-Muslim forum on interreligiouis relations after the Pope's controversial remarks on Islam at the University of Regensburg in 2006. (See prior posting.)

Wisconsin Village's Cross Display Is Questioned

The village of Holmen, Wisconsin finds itself in the midst of a church-state dispute according to yesterday's Holmen Courier. In 1960, a lighted star and cross were put up on Star Hill, then private property, with the cost of the display spit between the village and the Lion's Club. The cross is lit during the 40 days of Lent. Five years ago the village bought the property on Star Hill for use for a water reservoir. This has led resident Eric Barnes now to file an informal complaint with the village about the religious symbol on public land. So far the village has not responded.

Cert. Denied In Appeal of Injunction Against Disrupting Church Services

Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Lady Cage-Barile v. Church of Christ in Hollywood, (Docket No. 07-8742) (Order List). In the case below, found at 2007 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 6164 (CA Ct. App., 2007), the California Court of Appeals refused to dissolve an injunction that had been previously issued to prevent Lady Cage-Barile from entering the property of the Church of Christ in Hollywood, tearing down Church literature or disrupting services by profane language or unnecessary noise. The injunction was obtained after Cage-Barile, who disagreed with how the church was run, engaged in highly disruptive conduct at the Church. The Church's expulsion of her from membership failed to stop her from disrupting worship services.

New York Town Wants State To Pay for Prosecutions of Amish

In Morristown, New York, members of the town council have written newspapers urging the state to help pay for the town's prosecution of ten members of the conservative Swartzentruber Amish sect for building homes without a permit. Today's Watertown Daily Times reports that town officials say they are bearing the cost of a test case for enforcing state law. Costs include not just fees for the town's attorney, but also the cost of translating legal documents into Pennsylvania Dutch. In the first of the cases that is being tried, defendant's attorney claims religious persecution of his client.

UPDATE: Newsday on Tuesday reported that the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty has sent a 5-page letter supporting the Amish defendants to the town council, New York's Attorney General and the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. The letter says that their continued prosecution would violate a number of constitutional and statutory protections.

Iraqi Youth Becoming Skeptical of Religion

Today's Seattle Times, carrying an article published earlier this month in the New York Times, reports that Iraqi youth are becoming disenchanted with religion. Religious restrictions on their lives and religious violence have led at least some young people to reject Islam, a trend that runs counter to developments elsewhere in the Middle East. While the scope of this Iraqi disillusionment is unclear, there has been a decline in enrollment of graduate students in religion classes, and attendance at weekly prayer services appears to be down. The lengthy article is the second in a New York Times series on the lives of youth in the Muslim world at a time of religious revival.

Student At Center of Classic Released Time Case Reminisces

Last week marked the 60th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McCollum vs. Board of Education which struck down a released time program for religious education in the Champaign, Illinois public schools. Today's Tennessean reports on a talk given Sunday by 70-year old James McCollum, the student who was at the center of the 1948 case. He describes how, even though he was excused from the classes offered by local ministers at the request of his family, he "was put in a desk in the hall during the religion class which was generally reserved for miscreants." He added, "When my mother heard about that, it hit the fan."

Battles Over Secularism In Turkey Lead To Indictment of Top Leaders

The struggle between religious and secularist forces in Turkey has reached a new level. According to today's Turkish Daily News, the country's chief prosecutor has filed a 162-page indictment against the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), charging it with trying to turn Turkey into an Islamic state. Alleging that AKP's activities are inconsistent with the secularism required by Turkey's constitution, the indictment asks Turkey's Constitutional Court to ban top AKP leaders (including the country's President and its Prime Minister) from politics for 5 years. Today's Zaman reports on Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's speech responding to the indictment. Commenting on the political and economic uncertainty that the case is likely to cause, Reuters points out that in the past Turkish courts have banned more than 20 parties for having Islamist or Kurdish separatist agendas.

Meanwhile Human Events today reports that Turkey's Department of Religious Affairs (the Diyanet) is attempting to modernize and reinterpret Islam. It has announced that 35 religious scholars in the Theology Department at Ankara University have nearly completed a three-year forensic examination of the Islamic Hadiths. The authenticity of some Hadiths-- handed down orally-- have been questioned by some scholars. However an op-ed in Today's Zaman questions more generally the ability of the Directorate of Religious Affairs to maintain the existing system of state-controlled Islam.

UPDATE: Today's Zaman reported on Wednesday that two separate complaints have been filed against Chief Prosecutor Abdurrahman Yalçınkaya, claiming he prepared a wrongful indictment seeking closure of the AKP. One complaint was filed by lawyer Lawyer Sabri Erdoğan; the other was filed by a private organization, Young Civilians.