Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Origins of "Obama Is A Muslim" Rumor Are Traced
Trial Court Upholds Constitutionality of Virginia's "Division Statute"
In a companion 14-page letter opinion, the court ruled on five other interpretive issues under the Division Statute, concluding that the court's role was merely to determine whether the congregational vote was "fairly taken", and not to consider other factors. It distinguished cases involving the withdrawal of a single congregation from an hierarchical church where there was not a "division" within the church. In an order accompanying the two letter opinions, the court asked for further briefs from the parties on certain remaining procedural issues.
Reports on the court's decision were published by the Washington Post and Episcopal News Service. (See prior related posting.)
US House Passes Resolution Supporting Gospel Music Heritage Month
Texas High Court Says Exorcism Claims Entangle Court in Religious Dispute
Chief Justice Jefferson in a dissent joined by Justice Green and in party by Justice Johnson said:We do not mean to imply that "under the cloak of religion, persons may, with impunity," commit intentional torts upon their religious adherents.... Moreover, religious practices that threaten the public’s health, safety, or general welfare cannot be tolerated as protected religious belief.... But religious practices that might offend the rights or sensibilities of a non-believer outside the church are entitled to greater latitude when applied to an adherent within the church....
The Free Exercise Clause prohibits courts from deciding issues of religious doctrine. Here, the psychological effect of church belief in demons and the appropriateness of its belief in "laying hands" are at issue. Because providing a remedy for the very real, but religiously motivated emotional distress in this case would require us to take sides in what is essentially a religious controversy, we cannot resolve that dispute.
After today, a tortfeasor need merely allege a religious motive to deprive a Texas court of jurisdiction to compensate his fellow congregant for emotional damages. This sweeping immunity is inconsistent with United States Supreme Court precedent and extends far beyond the protections our Constitution affords religious conduct. The First Amendment guards religious liberty; it does not sanction intentional abuse in religion’s name.Justice Green also filed a separate dissent as did Justice Johnson. Today's Austin American-Statesman reports on the decision.
Friday, June 27, 2008
Muslim Physicist Files Suit Charging Energy Department With Discrimination
WI High Court Rules on Limitations Issues In Clergy Child Sex Abuse Case
President Speaks At National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast
9th Circuit Rules In Favor of Egyptian Copts Seeking Asylum
Britain Says Security Measures Limited By Muslim Religious Sensitivities
White House Hosts Conference On Faith-Based Initiative
Yesterday as President Bush addressed the conference (full text of remarks), the White House issued a Fact Sheet on the Initiative. The President summarized the achievements of OFBCI:I think really one of the stellar achievements of this initiative is that we've clarified ... what is allowable and what is not allowable, according to the First Amendment.... the President felt very strongly that it was wrong to just artificially close the door for those who were motivated by their private faith to perform a public service -- if they were creating these housing solutions for the homeless, and other important community outcome.
At the same time, we know that the First Amendment prohibits establishment of church, and so the President said very clearly that tax dollars are not to be used for spiritual mission -- only for secular mission; only for community service mission.
we have helped level the playing field for faith-based groups and other charities -- especially small organizations that have struggled to compete for funds in the past. We've educated religious groups about their civil rights. We've made the federal grant application process more accessible and transparent. We've trained thousands of federal employees to ensure that government does not discriminate against faith-based organizations. We've ensured that these groups do not have to give up their religious character to receive taxpayer money.The Justice Department has also released the text of Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey's remarks prepared for the conference. Describing the reexamination of federal policy represented by OFBCI, he said in part:
The Department of Justice has played, and will continue to play, a major role in that reexamination. In doing so, we built upon the principles behind Congress’s Charitable Choice laws and the Supreme Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence: that government must respect the essential character of faith-based providers; that no one needing help may be turned away because of his or her religion and that no one may be forced into religious practices; and that directly-awarded government funds must be spent on social services, not on religion.UPDATE: Jim Towey, former director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives,writes a column in the June 28 Washington Post setting out questions on the future of the faith-based initiative that he believes should be asked of the Presidential candidates.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Group Challenges July 4 Religious Broadcast Interview With Army General
Borough To Sue Churches Over Cemetery Upkeep
Court Hears Arguments on Restraining Order Barring Boy From Services
Carol Race, representing herself in court, denies that her son's conduct was disruptive, and argues that the harassment statute unconstitutionally infringes on her son's right to assemble in a public place. The church argues that the parish has the authority to determine who comes onto its property. It also asserts that as a religious corporation it has exclusive authority to decide how its liturgy and religious business is conducted. Thomas Janson, attorney for St. Joseph's Church, argued that requiring the church to allow Adam Race in services would violate the church's free exercise rights protected by the U.S. and Minnesota constitutions.
ACLU Presses Naval Academy on Mealtime Prayer
Tajikistan's Last Synagogue Destroyed In Urban Renewal Project
Justice Official Awarded Grant To Former White House Faith-Based Official
Reacting to the report (press release), Interfaith Alliance president C. Welton Gaddy said: "This incident of cronyism removes all doubts that the real mission of the faith-based initiative is to aid the Religious Right." [Thanks to Blog from the Capital for the lead.]
NY High Court Finds No Fiduciary Breach In Rabbi's Affair With Congregant
Yesterday's Newsday reported on the decision. [Thanks to J.J. Landa for the lead.]Allegations that give rise to only a general clergy-congregant relationship that includes aspects of counseling do not generally impose a fiduciary obligation upon a cleric....
Although she contends that Tendler's ulterior motive for inducing the sexual relationship was the fulfillment of his own gratification, rather than the achievement of Marmelstein's goals, Marmelstein has shown only that she was deceived by Tendler, not that she was so vulnerable as to surrender her will and capacity to determine her own best interests. In the absence of a prima facie showing that a fiduciary obligation was owed by Tendler, no cause of action can be maintained for an extended voluntary sexual affair between consenting adults, even if Marmelstein could prove that her acquiescence was obtained through lies, manipulation or other morally opprobrious conduct (see Civil Rights Law § 80-a).
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Bush Meets With Vietnamese Prime Minister; Discusses Religious Freedom
County Seeks State Department Views On Saudi Academy
Lawsuit Challenges Georgia Restrictions On Sex Offenders As Church Volunteers
The new statute ... intrudes upon core church functions and decisions. Under SB1, people on the registry cannot follow their faith's commandments to perform good works. And, despite a religious organization's own desires and decisions, it may not ever employ a person on the sex offender registry or ask such a person t volunteer as a choir member, serve on a church committee, or perform any other function. Even helping a pastor with Bible study or preparing a meal in a church kitchen will subject people on the registry to prosecution and imprisonment.Plaintiffs also filed a Brief in Support of the Motion. The SCHR press release announcing the lawsuit contains links to other documents in the case as well. AP also reports on the litigation.