Settlement Reached In Street Preachers' Challenge of Town's Noise Ordinance

Seacoast Online yesterday reported that a settlement has been entered by a New Hampshire federal district court in a challenge by two Christian evangelists to Hampton, New Hampshire's statute barring loud and unreasonable noise in public places. (See prior posting.) The settlement permits the two evangelists to return to Hampton Beach as street preachers between the hours of 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., so long as any amplification of their voices does not exceed 85 decibels from 65 feet away. If they exceed the decibel limit, the town will give them a warning before arresting them. Originally they were arrested in August 2008 for violating the noise ordinance, but were acquitted.

Several Jewish Groups Working To Get Rid of Stupak Amendment In Health Care Bill

According to The Forward yesterday, several Jewish groups that favor abortion rights are working to keep the House-passed Stupak amendment out of the Senate version of the health care reform bill. The groups include the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, the National Council of Jewish Women, the American Jewish Congress and the Joint Action Committee for Political Affairs. The paper reports on an interesting argument being advanced by the groups:

The director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, Rabbi David Saperstein, said that in pushing for the stricter abortion measure, religious conservatives are using the opposite argument from their case for allowing government-subsidized school vouchers to be used for religious schools. Conservatives argue that the voucher case does not constitute government endorsement of religion because a mother or father is making the choice of where to spend the money.

But in pushing for the adoption of Stupak, proponents are saying that if the government gives an individual money for health insurance, the government is then endorsing abortion if the recipient uses her insurance to pay for such a procedure.

Reactions To Sunday's Swiss Vote Banning Minarets

To no one's surprise, Switzerland is facing broad-based protests from around the world after voters on Sunday approved an initiative that banned future construction of minarets in the country. An AFP report says the Vatican joined Muslim leaders in decrying the vote, as did the Lutheran World Federation (ENI) and Asma Jahangir, UN special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief. (Dawn.) Meanwhile legal experts suggest that the ban may be in conflict with the European Convention on Human Rights. Switzerland currently presides over the European Court of Human Rights that passes on cases claiming violations of the Convention. (The Independent). According to Nepal News, however, anti-immigrant groups in Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands are calling on their own governments to consider similar bans. And the Christian Science Monitor reviews restriction placed on building of churches by major majority-Muslim countries-- Indonesia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

Settlement Restores Prisoner's Right To Preach

The ACLU of New Jersey announced yesterday that it has reached a settlement with New Jersey prison authorities under which officials will restore the right of a Pentecostal minister who is an inmate at New Jersey State Prison to preach at weekly services and teach Bible study classes. According to the complaint (full text) in Thompson v. Ricci, (D NJ, filed 12/3/2008), Howard Thompson, Jr. had been preaching in prison for over a decade when authorities suddenly imposed a ban on preaching by any inmate. The complaint alleged that this prevented Thompson from carrying out his religious calling in violation of the First Amendment and RLUIPA.

Cert. Denied In Case Of Valedictorian's Religious Graduation Speech

The U.S. Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Corder v. Lewis Palmer School District, (Docket No. 09-257, Nov. 30, 2009). (Order List.) In the case, the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected constitutional claims brought by a Colorado high school co-valedictorian who was forced to apologize after she delivered remarks at a high school's graduation ceremony encouraging students to accept Jesus Christ. The student had presented a different version of the speech in advance to her principal. (See prior posting.) AP reports on the Supreme Court's refusal to review the case.

New Draft Kenya Constitution Guarantees Church-State Separation, But Recognizes Kadhis Courts

On Nov. 17, a government panel in Kenya released a draft constitution for the country (full text). It could be voted on in a referendum next year. A previous draft constitution was defeated in a 2005 referendum. (AP). Chapter 2, Sec. 10 of the new document released by the Committee of Experts on Constitutional Review provides:

(1) State and religion shall be separate.
(2) There shall be no State religion.
(3) The State shall treat all religions equally.

The current draft (Chap. 13, Sec. 208) contains a controversial provision that would recognize Muslim civil courts (Kadhis courts). Muslim courts are now recognized in Kenya by an act of Parliament, but this would give them constitutional protection. Afrique en Ligne reported yesterday that the powerful Anglican Church of Kenya has called for an amendment to remove recognition of Kadhis courts from the constitution, calling the inclusion of the provision a contradiction of equality of all religions. The Church would leave Kadhis court recognition to statute. The Anglican Church also called on the drafters to clearly define the right of Kenyans to propagate religion and the right of individuals to convert to another religion. (See prior related posting.)

Brazil's Supreme Court Orders Limited Accommodation For Saturday Entrance Exam

Jewish high schoolers in Brazil are seeking to schedule an alternative date on which they can take the national exam for high school graduates that is used for college admissions. The exam, known as ENEM, is required for admission to some of the country's top universities, including federally funded ones. It is not mandatory for admission to locally-funded state universities. The exam is scheduled for Saturday, December 5, but observant Jews say that a Saturday exam would require them to violate their Sabbath restrictions. Haaretz yesterday reported that originally, in a suit filed by the Center for Religious Jewish Education, a court in Sao Paulo held that the country's education ministry was required to set an alternative date for Jewish students. However last week Brazil's Supreme Court reversed, holding that an alternative date would undermine equality. It said that allowing Jewish students to take the exam on December 5, but after sundown, would be adequate accommodation. [Thanks to Joel Katz (Relig. & State in Israel) for the lead.]

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• George Letsas, Is There a Right Not to be Offended in One’s Religious Beliefs?, (June 1, 2009).
• Richard M. Esenberg, Must God Be Dead or Irrelevant: Drawing a Circle that Lets Me In , (William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2009).
• John M. Kang, Appeal to Heaven: On the Religious Origins of the Constitutional Right of Revolution, (William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 18, pp. 281-326, 2009).
• Elizabeth Rose Schiltz, Dueling Vocations: Managing the Tensions between Our Private and Public Callings, (Women, Sex, and the Church, Erika Bachiochi, ed., Pauline Books & Media, 2010).
• Yuval Sinai, Arbitration as an Ideal Judicial Procedure, (December 19, 2008).
• Paul T. Babie, Looking East to the Concept of Property — A Review Essay of Witte and Alexander, Christianity and Law: An Introduction, (Adelaide Law Review, Forthcoming).
  

Recent and Forthcoming Books:

• Knox Thames, International Religious Freedom Advocacy: A Guide to Organizations, Law, and NGOs, (Baylor Univ. Press, Aug. 2009).
• Randall Balmer, The Making of Evangelicalism From Revivalism to Politics and Beyond, (Baylor Univ. Press, Feb. 2010).

Egypt Reportedly Covering Up Anti-Copt Violence In Town of Farshoot

AINA today says that the Egyptian government and Egyptian State Security are attempting to cover up extensive mob violence against Copts a week ago in the town of Farshoot. Apparently the violence was triggered by a rumor that a Copt had sexually molested a 12-year old Muslim girl. According to AINA, the principal of Al-Azhar Institute in Farshoot incited his students to loot and burn Coptic-owned businesses. The Egyptian government has imposed a news blackout on the incident and State Security is pressuring the Coptic Church in Nag Hammadi and the victims of the violence to accept extrajudicial reconciliation and to reopen the damaged businesses without first receiving compensation. Thirty-five Coptic families have been deported from surrounding villages, supposedly for their safety. However their houses were then looted by Muslims.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Gallagher v. Shelton, (10th Cir., Nov. 24, 2009), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected various claims by an Jewish inmate that prison officials delayed and inadequately accomodated his requests for a kosher diet, and that the prison chaplain failed to help him get a menorah and candles to celebrate Hanukkah. Several of the allegations involved merely isolated acts of negligence by prison officials. The court remanded to clarify that claims dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies were dismissed without prejudice.

In Kuperman v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison, (D NH, Nov. 20, 2009), a New Hampshire federal district court dismissed on mootness and collateral estoppel grounds a Jewish prisoner's complaint over rules that automatically suspended his kosher meal privileges for a single violation in which he purchased or consumed non-kosher food. The prison has subsequently modified its rules giving prisoners more leeway before suspending access to a religious diet. The Concord Monitor reported on the decision. (See prior related posting.)

In Elliott v. Sims, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108365 (SD OH, Nov. 4, 2009), an Ohio federal district court permitted inmates from separate prisons to bring a single action challenging prison authorities' refusal to permit them to abstain from work on Sundays violates their religious exercise rights under RLUIPA.

Atkins v. Christiansen, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108503 (WD MI, Nov. 20, 2009), involves a claim for an injunction and damages by an inmate who alleges that he was wrongly designated as a member of a Security Threat Group because he attended Nation of Islam religious services. A Michigan federal district court, accepting a magistrate's recommendations in part (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108545, July 13, 2009) held that plaintiff's official capacity monetary relief claims are barred by the 11th Amendment; certain of the claims were time barred; that summary judgment would be premature as to qualified immunity; and that a claim for monetary damages may be asserted in individual capacity claims under RLUIPA.

In Chalif v. Artus, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109813 (ND NY, Nov. 24, 2009), a New York federal district court accepted the recommendations of a magistrate judge (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109814, Oct. 15, 2009) and dismissed claims by an inmate that he was prevented from practicing his religion (Church of Jesus Christ Christian), that his religious materials were wrongfully seized, and that other inmates are allowed to practice supremacist religions, but he was not.

Swiss Voters Approve Ban On Minarets

Swissinfo.ch reports that voters in Switzerland today approved an initiative supported by the right- wing Swiss People's Party and the Federal Democratic Union imposing a ban on the construction of minarets in the country. The final tally showed that 57.5% of the voters and a majority of the cantons backed the initiative. The government, and most political parties, churches and businesses had all opposed the ban. A government statement after the vote said that the Federal Council respects the decision of the voters. New minaret construction is now banned. The four existing minarets will be permitted to remain. Swiss Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf, who strongly opposed the ban, said the initiative was really a proxy for opposition to perceived creeping Islamicisation and sharia law. Opponents fear the vote will fuel extremism and tarnish Switzerland's reputation in the Muslim world. Switzerland has around 350,000 Muslim immigrants (4.5% of the population), mostly moderates from the former Yugoslavia and Turkey. It is estimated that there are 160 mosques and prayer rooms in the country, mainly in empty factories and warehouses.

UPDATE: The London Telegraph has more detailed vote results: 57.5% in favor (1.534 million people), 42.5% against (1.135 million people), with 22 of the 26 cantons in support of the initiative.

House of Yahweh Leader Avoids Polygamy Charges

A report from McClatchy Newspapers published yesterday in the Rochester (MN) Post-Bulletin examines the House of Yahweh Church (whose compound is near Clyde, Texas) and the Church's leader, Yisrayl Hawkins. For many years it was rumored that the sect engages n polygamy. In Feb. 2008, Callahan County Attorney Shane Deel charged Yisrayl Hawkins with four counts of bigamy and child labor violations. This was billed as a test of Texas' revised law that made polygamy a felony. After a change in venue to Parker County, county authorities decided they could not afford the cost of the bigamy prosecution and last month they negotiated a plea deal in which Hawkins plead "no contest" to four counts of child labor violations. He was fined and received probation. The article details much of Yisrayl Hawkins' background and reports that the sect keeps tight control over the finances of its members. They are expected to pay tithes totally 30% of their income. Hawkins started the Church in 1980 when he was an Abilene, Texas policeman and owned a mobile home park. His daughter says he is now worth millions and has at least three palatial homes, while many of his followers are destitute.

IRS Releases 2006 Data On Income of Non-Profits

Earlier this week, the Internal Revenue Service issued its Fall 2009 Statistics of Income Bulletin which sets out data for tax year 2006 on returns filed by non-profit organizations. Churches and church-affiliated organizations are not required to file Form 990. Thus only 853 of the 301,214 Forms 990 or 990-EZ were from "Religion related" non-profits. This group of religious non-profits reported total assets of $17.8 million and revenue of $2.8 million. Most of their income was from program service revenue. Their income exceeded their expenses by $550 million. [Data at pg. 5 of Bulletin].

Italian Paper Says Berlusconi Diverted Secular Funds To Catholic Church

An article published last week in Italy's La Repubblica and translated by Concordat Watch reports that Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has directed to Catholic churches and monasteries some 10.6 million Euros that Italian taxpayers had earmarked on their tax returns for secular institutions. Under Italian law, 0.8% of each Italian's taxes go either to one of six religious groups, or to a social assistance program run by the government. If a taxpayer does not declare a recipient, the amount goes to the Catholic Church or the government in proportion to the amounts others have designated for them. (Background.) Apparently, however, in September of this year Berlusconi issued a decree giving him greater discretion over distribution of these tax funds. La Repubblica suggests that Berlusconi is using these additional funds to make peace with the Catholic Church after a bitter feud between Berlusconi and the Vatican over Berlusconi's sexual dalliances. (See prior posting.)

Kentucky High Court Says Barring Reference To Jesus Was Harmless Error

Edmonds v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, (KY Sup. Ct., Nov. 25, 2009), involved numerous objections by two convicted defendants to their convictions on charges of sodomy, robbery and murder. One of the defendants claimed that his Free Exercise rights were violated when the trial judge sustained objections to his lawyer's attempt, in the penalty phase closing argument, to compare the defendant to Jesus being put to death on the cross. The Supreme Court concluded that while it may not have been necessary for the trial judge to restrict closing argument in this way, it was not likely this had any substantial effect on the verdict. Any error was therefore harmless.

In Fiji, Government's Attempt To Co-Opt Religious Leadership Backfires

Australia's Sunday Sydney Morning Herald carries a long report on the complicated involvement of Methodist churches in Fiji with the Pacific island nation's politics. In the past two decades, Fiji has had four coups, each reflecting tensions between ethnic Fijians, who largely belong to the Methodist Church, and Indian Fijians, most of whom are Hindu. Some in the Methodist Church have backed a proposal to turn Fiji into a Christian state. (Background.) The latest coup, in 2006, which brought military leader Frank Bainimarama to power, was opposed by the Methodist Church. So, while impeding or banning much of the activity traditional Methodists, Bainimarama's allies promoted evangelist Pastor Atu Vulaono, and his "Souls to Jesus" campaign in an attempt to co-opt the traditional leadership of the Methodist Church.

However Vulaono's New Methodist Church , and his campaign against crime that was funded by the Fiji police department, got out of hand. Vulaono was drawing 20,000 people at his rallies and had established 70 churches. Police officers were required to attend New Methodist crusades where they were forced to dance in their police uniforms. A new law-and-order campaign ordered couples not to embrace in public, and sometimes forced prostitutes to jump off a bridge 6 meters into an ocean inlet. Some were forced to attend Vulaono's crusades. Fijian courts were pressuring women who were victims of domestic violence to reconcile with their husbands. Eventually this anti-crime crusade by the New Methodists became too embarrassing for the regime, and the Attorney General put a halt to it. Fiji's chief censor sent a letter to media editors telling them to stop broadcasting the New Methodists' paid programming, because the group had become a security risk.

Jury Says Religious Order Not Liable For Molestation By Teacher

In 2007, the Delaware legislature passed the Child Victim Act . It created a 2-year window for filing of child sexual abuse claims previously barred by the statute of limitations. (See prior related posting.) The statute provides that if the suit is against an institution or other legal entity that employed the abuser and which owed a duty of care to the child, plaintiff must show gross negligence in order to recover. Earlier this week, in the first case to come to trial under the new statute, a jury refused to award damages against the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales. Tuesday's Wilmington News Journal reports that while the jury concluded that a now-deceased teacher, Rev. Francis Norris, molested plaintiff in 1962, the jury could not conclude that the Oblates were grossly negligent. Salesianum School knew the teacher suffered from alcoholism and depression, but, according to the jury, it could not have foreseen that this would lead to sexual abuse of a student. Plaintiff's attorney claimed that memos about Norris' alcoholism and depression contained "code words" used in the 1960's to indicate that a priest had problems with pedophilia.

Alternative Proposal For South Carolina "I Believe" Plates Is Filed

South Carolina residents may get a chance to purchase "I Believe" license plates after all. Earlier this month, a federal district court ruled that a statute, promoted by the Lieutenant Governor, that authorizes the plates violates the Establishment Clause. The legislatively approved tags were to carry the "I Believe" message, along with a cross superimposed on a stained glass window. (See prior posting.) Today's Rock Hill (SC) Herald reports that now a private group, the Palmetto Family Council, has filed a request with the state Department of Motor Vehicles for the issuance of an "I Believe" plate under S.C. Code of Laws, Sec. 56-3-8000. That section permits non-profit groups to apply for issuance of specialty tags, carrying an emblem or symbol representing the organization. The group need only submit 400 prepaid orders or pay $4000, and must also submit a plan to market further sale of the license tags. The only grounds for refusing to issue specialized plates under this section is that they are offensive or fail to meet community standards.

Canadian Court Says Property of Break-Away Anglican Parishes Belongs To Diocese

In Bentley v. Anglican Synod of the Diocese of New Westminster, (BC Sup. Ct., Nov. 25, 2009), the British Columbia Supreme Court (the Canadian province's superior trial court) issued a lengthy opinion in a dispute over ownership of the property of four parishes that broke away from the Anglican Church of Canada and affiliated with the more conservative Anglican Network in Canada. The split came over the Diocese's decision to accept a rite to bless same-sex unions. The court held that ownership of parish properties remain with the Diocese. Under the Act to Incorporate the General Synod of the Church of England in Canada, parishes can dispose of property only with the consent of the Executive Committee and Bishop. Using the property for purposes related to ANiC amounts to improperly taking them outside the jurisdiction of the Diocese. The court also rejected the parishes' argument that the property was held in trust for ministry consistent with historic, orthodox Anglican doctrine and practice. It held that only departure from core tenets or fundamental doctrine can breach a religious purpose trust. The blessing of same-sex unions does not engage core or fundamental doctrine.

The court went on to hold that the Bishop lacked authority to replace parish trustees. However trustees elected by each break-away parish must carry out their duties in accordance with the rules of the Anglican Church in Canada-- something that the elected trustees are unlikely to want to do. Finally the court held that $2.2 million from the bequest of a former member to the building fund of one of the parishes involved should, consistent with the donor's intent, go to the building needs of the parish now affiliated with ANiC. Applying the cy pres doctrine, the court said that the donor intended the funds to benefit the parish that serves the Chinese community in British Columbia. Yesterday's Anglican Journal reported on the decision.

Agreement Reached With Abuse Claimants In Alaska Diocese Bankruptcy

In February 2008, the Catholic Diocese of Fairbanks, Alaska filed for Chapter 11 reorganization under the federal Bankruptcy Code. (Press release.) According to AP, at a status hearing on Tuesday in federal bankruptcy court, it was disclosed that a preliminary agreement has been reached with clergy abuse victims for settlement of their claims. The nearly 300 victims will be awarded almost $10 million from Diocese funds. However, a portion of that amount will be set aside to use to pursue the Diocese's four insurance companies for additional amounts of up to $100 million. The remainder of the $10 million will be divided among claimants based on the severity of the abuse they suffered. Many of the prior filings in the Chapter 11 case are available from the Diocese website.